![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Baker wrote in :
On 2007-10-21 07:47:55 -0700, "Paul J. Adam" said: Don't forget the sighting system, too - if the V-22s are going in at night then you need to match the sight to the weapon and its range (so you can identify targets in time to effectively engage them). Actually, it seems to me that the V-22 could have a real advantage in this respect. Contemporary remotely-targeted gun systems can slew, aim and burst-fire far, far faster than a single gunner can provide it with targets. And the heavy part of the system is the gun, ammo and physical aiming hardware, not the targeting vision systems and associated avionics. So why not take a COTS gun, add another 6 vision/targeting channels and let the troopies in the back pick out bogies for the gun to shred? A full-360 ventral TV/IR vision system wouldn't add much weight, and the individual soldier aiming apparatus need not be more than a headset LCD sight and a joystick plugged into the targetting data bus. Assign one of the senior NCO's to monitor all the troopie targeting pippers with an override switch in order to prevent friendly-fire mistakes or ammo wastage. Expense might be a prohibitive factor, but probably not weight. Do wonders for the morale of the ground pounders making the assault, though. Au contraire, mon ami. Check out the Huey NTIS system some time. The targeting hardware is quite a bit heavier than the gun. Changing out the gun requires a couple of strong Marines. Changing the targeting hardware, in toto, requires a hoist. No "four guys on a hernia bar" stuff allowed. Dave in San Diego |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-10-27 22:19:22 -0700, Dave said:
Au contraire, mon ami. Check out the Huey NTIS system some time. The targeting hardware is quite a bit heavier than the gun. Changing out the gun requires a couple of strong Marines. Changing the targeting hardware, in toto, requires a hoist. No "four guys on a hernia bar" stuff allowed. Huh. I'm surprised, but I'll take your word for it since NTIS seems to be a current-technology system. I wouldn't have thought it'd take a hoist to lift any subsystem out of a Huey other than the engine pack or transmission. Besides, if I'm reading the Bell website right it seems that that targeting system is way, way more complex than what I'm suggesting. I'm just talking about fixed, passive, relatively non-enhanced (i.e., no sensor cooling, no heavy optics) VL/IR sensors...not-so-stupid CCD minicams, essentially. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Desktop Wallpaper - "Osprey Out for a spin". | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Simulators | 0 | August 31st 07 02:48 PM |
"Seeking Foreign Buyers For Osprey" | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 72 | July 4th 07 05:26 AM |
Desktop Wallpaper - "A covey of Osprey". | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Simulators | 0 | June 1st 07 08:41 PM |
"Marine Corps Grounds V-22 Osprey Aircraft" | Mike[_1_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 18th 07 03:40 PM |
V-22 Osprey "ground effect" question | Robert | Naval Aviation | 6 | January 2nd 07 03:44 PM |