![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
You're 4 miles SW of ROYCE. http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0710/00198IL12R.PDF Approach says "Cessna '1GS,cross ROYCE at or above 2 thousand, cleared visual approach runwy 12R. Contact the tower on 118.7." On initial contact, Tower says "Cessna '1GS, runwy 12R, cleared to land." Do you still have to cross ROYCE at 2,000 or can you head for the numbers and come on down? From 4SW of Royce... I'd go to Royce as instructed, and begin my visual descent after crossing Royce, making my right turn inbound, and visually identifying the airport. Crossing Royce @ 2000 doesn't make for an uncomfortable descent, and it's not so far out of the way, so I don't think I'd bother to question the clearance. If things weren't busy, I'd probably just ask if I can head for the numbers once I was on with the tower. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to
the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude "B A R R Y" wrote in message ... Dan Luke wrote: You're 4 miles SW of ROYCE. http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0710/00198IL12R.PDF Approach says "Cessna '1GS,cross ROYCE at or above 2 thousand, cleared visual approach runwy 12R. Contact the tower on 118.7." On initial contact, Tower says "Cessna '1GS, runwy 12R, cleared to land." Do you still have to cross ROYCE at 2,000 or can you head for the numbers and come on down? From 4SW of Royce... I'd go to Royce as instructed, and begin my visual descent after crossing Royce, making my right turn inbound, and visually identifying the airport. Crossing Royce @ 2000 doesn't make for an uncomfortable descent, and it's not so far out of the way, so I don't think I'd bother to question the clearance. If things weren't busy, I'd probably just ask if I can head for the numbers once I was on with the tower. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pgbnh wrote:
OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude Not until you reach ROYCE and the visual approach clearance becomes effective. Just like reporting the OM to the tower when the weather is 200 and 1/2 and the tower says "Cleared to land." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bee wrote: pgbnh wrote: OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude Not until you reach ROYCE and the visual approach clearance becomes effective. Just like reporting the OM to the tower when the weather is 200 and 1/2 and the tower says "Cleared to land." Reporting the marker to the tower is not necessary unless asked for. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Bee wrote: pgbnh wrote: OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude Not until you reach ROYCE and the visual approach clearance becomes effective. Just like reporting the OM to the tower when the weather is 200 and 1/2 and the tower says "Cleared to land." Reporting the marker to the tower is not necessary unless asked for. And, your point is? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bee" wrote in message ... Not until you reach ROYCE and the visual approach clearance becomes effective. The visual approach clearance was effective the instant it was issued. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() pgbnh wrote: OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude You are correct. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
pgbnh wrote: OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude You are correct. So, it is now okay to descend into that traffic that you speculated exists in your early post in this thread? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, because the issuance of the 'Clear to land' indicates that the traffic
is no longer an issue. I forget the FAR numbers, but I believe my obligation is to comply with the most recently received directions from ATC. Clear to land means I am the decision maker on heading and altitude and previous restrictions and directions no longer apply "Bee" wrote in message ... Newps wrote: pgbnh wrote: OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude You are correct. So, it is now okay to descend into that traffic that you speculated exists in your early post in this thread? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At the least I would ask the tower if the ROYCE crossing restriction was
deleted. pgbnh wrote: Yes, because the issuance of the 'Clear to land' indicates that the traffic is no longer an issue. I forget the FAR numbers, but I believe my obligation is to comply with the most recently received directions from ATC. Clear to land means I am the decision maker on heading and altitude and previous restrictions and directions no longer apply "Bee" wrote in message ... Newps wrote: pgbnh wrote: OK, now how does this change if, prior to reaching ROYCE, we are switched to the tower and Tower says Cessna 123, cleared to land. (The OP did receive such a clearance, but it was not clear where he was at the time)Does the altitude restriction still hold? I would say no, as, to me, 'Cleared to land' means that I am now in control of my heading and altitude You are correct. So, it is now okay to descend into that traffic that you speculated exists in your early post in this thread? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When to descend | Dan Luke[_2_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | October 14th 07 09:12 AM |