![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank F. Matthews wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote: John Kulp wrote: Gates can be a problem sometime but not runways. The GPS system would handle about 25% more flights on the same runways. Aren't you paying enough all ready for flights? Want to pay more when the politicos are stealing what money is already being paid for? What makes you think that GPS could decrease the needed separation? I didn't say anything about paying more. What I suggested in this forum a month or so ago was the same net cost just make it cheaper off peak and more expensive on-peak. That's how economics should work. Things should cost more when they are in higher demand and less when they are in lower demand. Then again it should also be that an increased use of resources should cost more. Thus 747s should cost more than 737s and 380s more than 737s. The only serious issue should be how much more. The difference in resource use between a 737 and a 747 both wanting to land around the same time is insignificant as compared to the difference in use of resources between and aircraft landing at 8:00 am and one at 2:00am. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Restoration | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel Supplements | Jetnw | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 15th 04 07:50 AM |