![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What makes you think that GPS could decrease the needed separation? Because that is exactly what it is designed to do? It _may_ be able to more precisely control separation out in the airways, and get them set up for landing sequence, but notice I said "may." They do a pretty good job with radar, right now. What it _can not_ do is put more aircraft on the runways per hour in the big airports operating with all of the landing slots full. The separation for wake turbulence is always going to be the limiting factor in how many aircraft can land at a given busy airport at peak times. GPS is not going to change that. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Restoration | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel Supplements | Jetnw | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 15th 04 07:50 AM |