![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"phil hunt" wrote in message
Would the F-35 even get close enough to fire an AMRAAM? Meteor is longer range, and since the Typhoon is faster it could (depending on the tactical situation) decide whether to break contact. Depends a lot on radar capability and intiial detection rhage. if the JSF is significantly stealthier than the Typhoon , it could get clsoer before benig vulnerabel to counter-fire. That's one part fo the logic of the F/A-22 and MARAAM -- put the complexity ni the airframe, not the missile. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:48:10 GMT, Thomas Schoene wrote:
"phil hunt" wrote in message rg Would the F-35 even get close enough to fire an AMRAAM? Meteor is longer range, and since the Typhoon is faster it could (depending on the tactical situation) decide whether to break contact. Depends a lot on radar capability and intiial detection rhage. if the JSF is significantly stealthier than the Typhoon , it could get clsoer before benig vulnerabel to counter-fire. Possibly. If the F-35 is using its radar, that may well give it away. If it isn't, thne it might be able to pick up the Typhoon's radar before the Typhoon knows it (that's likely that the opposiite scvenario, since the F-35's radar reflection is smaller). But if the Typhoon switches its radar off too, then the advantage disappears, and both aircraft are limited to what they can sense through IR, or what information is passed to them from sensors elsewhere (for example, on the ground, or on AWACS aircraft). I think warfare iscreasingly going to be a competition to see who spots who first, and the first one to get spotted loses. So I see passive sensors becoming more prominent, and active sensors less so. That's one part fo the logic of the F/A-22 and MARAAM -- put the complexity ni the airframe, not the missile. I'm not sure that's wise, since a missile will always be faster and more maneouvrable than a manned aircraft. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (My real email address would be if you added 275 to it and reversed the last two letters). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In | zeno | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 30th 04 06:20 PM |
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In | zeno | Home Built | 0 | October 30th 04 06:19 PM |
Why don't all fighters have low Wing Loading? | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 6 | September 22nd 03 10:52 PM |
US (Brit/Japanese/German/USSR) Use of Gun Cameras in Fighters?? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 3 | July 17th 03 06:02 AM |
Scrambling fighters | John Doe | Military Aviation | 7 | July 2nd 03 09:26 PM |