A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A-4 / A-7 Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 16th 03, 01:47 PM
David Casey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:44:56 -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:

There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just enough
to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of the
Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the
buried many of them to get the new jets.


You should email these folks to help them set their records straight:

Air Force History Support Office
Reference and Analysis Branch
AFHSO/HOR


Dave
--
You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us!
US Army Signal Corps!!
www.geocities.com/davidcasey98

B Co, 404th Signal Battalion,
404th Infantry Division (Lemming)
"We *are* UMA!"
  #2  
Old October 16th 03, 03:06 PM
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Casey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:44:56 -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:

There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just

enough
to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the beginning of

the
Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets, they stated that the
buried many of them to get the new jets.


You should email these folks to help them set their records straight:

Air Force History Support Office
Reference and Analysis Branch
AFHSO/HOR


You do it if it's that important to you. History is written by the winners
and we all know that there is only the history that we are fed. Sort of
like, "What was the real reason behind the Civil War". History says that it
was over slavery (depending on whom you speak to), the North says it was
about the Secession of the South. But the South says it was over the one
sided economics of the day. It was definately NOT slavery as Lincoln vetoed
the Emancipation the first time through.

But you keep reading those books and stay inside.



  #3  
Old October 16th 03, 05:26 PM
David Casey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:06:14 -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:

There isn't a lot of info on the P-38, the P-47 or the P-51 but just
enough to verify that they were still in service in 1950 at the
beginning of the Korean War. But talking with some Korean Air Vets,
they stated that the buried many of them to get the new jets.


You should email these folks to help them set their records straight:

Air Force History Support Office
Reference and Analysis Branch
AFHSO/HOR


You do it if it's that important to you. History is written by the winners
and we all know that there is only the history that we are fed. Sort of
like, "What was the real reason behind the Civil War". History says that it
was over slavery (depending on whom you speak to), the North says it was
about the Secession of the South. But the South says it was over the one
sided economics of the day. It was definately NOT slavery as Lincoln vetoed
the Emancipation the first time through.

But you keep reading those books and stay inside.


First, it wasn't a book but an actual email from someone who has access to
that information which red posted which (surprise surprise) showed you to
be wrong.

Second, "history is written by the winners" doesn't apply here as it's US
military history we're talking about and last I checked the US military
wasn't fighting itself during WWII.

Third, if you're so brain dead as to take someone who *knows* what you're
talking about as a bunch of crap it's no wonder you've been laughed at from
one end of Usenet to the other.

Fourth, why are you trying to change the subject to the Civil War when we're
talking about the P-38 and your claim it was still in active service after
1949 when the Air Force itself says you're wrong?

Dave
--
You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us!
US Army Signal Corps!!
www.geocities.com/davidcasey98

B Co, 404th Signal Battalion,
404th Infantry Division (Lemming)
"We *are* UMA!"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question A Lieberman Instrument Flight Rules 18 January 30th 05 04:51 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
A question on Airworthiness Inspection Dave S Home Built 1 August 10th 04 05:07 AM
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question jlauer Home Built 7 November 16th 03 01:51 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.