![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Wass" wrote Maybe this will be the push that the gubermint needs to pass some kind of protection for individual parts makers, similar to what was done for small aircraft manufacturers some years back. Somewhere, somehow, I'm hopeful that the gubermint will do something to make it less attractive to let everyone going sue-happy. Crazy, yes. I still hope it happens, though. It NEEDS to happen, anyway. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Jerry Wass" wrote Maybe this will be the push that the gubermint needs to pass some kind of protection for individual parts makers, similar to what was done for small aircraft manufacturers some years back. Somewhere, somehow, I'm hopeful that the gubermint will do something to make it less attractive to let everyone going sue-happy. Crazy, yes. I still hope it happens, though. It NEEDS to happen, anyway. -- Jim in NC I suspect that the "protection" for the aircraft manufacturers is the reason that the insurance for suppliers has gone up - they are next in line in the food chain. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote I suspect that the "protection" for the aircraft manufacturers is the reason that the insurance for suppliers has gone up - they are next in line in the food chain. Prolly right, with that. Net, they need to extend the protection to everything on the airplane. Even better, take this opportunity to make some rulings to stop the madness of meaningless law suits, all across the legal system. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 18:32:46 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote: "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote I suspect that the "protection" for the aircraft manufacturers is the reason that the insurance for suppliers has gone up - they are next in line in the food chain. Prolly right, with that. Net, they need to extend the protection to everything on the airplane. Even better, take this opportunity to make some rulings to stop the madness of meaningless law suits, all across the legal system. Like THAT will ever happen in the "land of many laws - poorly written and irratically enforced" -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() clare at snyder.on.ca wrote Like THAT will ever happen in the "land of many laws - poorly written and irratically enforced" Hey, if yer gunna dream, dream BIG ! ! ! I shoulda added something to that, like a last comment of: "Yeah, Right!" -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's why carbs are being discontinued...
http://arthuralanwolk.com/_wsn/page2.html Our old friend Alan Wolk that almost wiped out AvWeb. Look at the other suites he posts. He's doing more to reduce flying accidents than the FAA. Of course, No Flying means No flying accidents. "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in message ... "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Jerry Wass" wrote Maybe this will be the push that the gubermint needs to pass some kind of protection for individual parts makers, similar to what was done for small aircraft manufacturers some years back. Somewhere, somehow, I'm hopeful that the gubermint will do something to make it less attractive to let everyone going sue-happy. Crazy, yes. I still hope it happens, though. It NEEDS to happen, anyway. -- Jim in NC I suspect that the "protection" for the aircraft manufacturers is the reason that the insurance for suppliers has gone up - they are next in line in the food chain. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I blamed the lawyers before I even knew about this. Lawyers screw up
everything they touch, it's not about liability or fairness or common sense, it about money. they should all hang, every single one of 'em. If you're a lawyer and you're offended, that's fine with me, be offended---Then get a real job you leech! "Cy Galley" wrote in message news:ValXi.185405$Fc.162766@attbi_s21... Here's why carbs are being discontinued... http://arthuralanwolk.com/_wsn/page2.html Our old friend Alan Wolk that almost wiped out AvWeb. Look at the other suites he posts. He's doing more to reduce flying accidents than the FAA. Of course, No Flying means No flying accidents. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alex G." wrote in message
... I blamed the lawyers before I even knew about this. Lawyers screw up everything they touch, it's not about liability or fairness or common sense, it about money. they should all hang, every single one of 'em. If you're a lawyer and you're offended, that's fine with me, be offended---Then get a real job you leech! Question: What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean Answer: I don't know, but it sounds like a good start! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial precision landings | [email protected] | Piloting | 19 | August 19th 06 09:51 PM |
Non-precision approach without a published MAP? | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | August 1st 06 08:09 AM |
Why are non precision approaches not lined up? | Greg Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 31 | October 9th 05 05:05 PM |
Precision instrument flying | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | May 22nd 05 02:25 PM |
For Sale: Precision Simulator 1.2 | Mike | Simulators | 0 | November 15th 03 10:54 PM |