A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Precision Airmotive LLC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 4th 07, 11:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Scott[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 367
Default Precision Airmotive LLC

I think the key is for the corporation (Precision in this case) to have
no assets (hence, nothing to go after with a lawsuit), so this sounds
viable. However, what if it's determined that the tooling you own were
the cause of part failures. Would you personally be liable in any way?
Maybe you put your tooling in an LLC or corporation, again, so that it
has no assets worth sueing over (except the tooling itself...and if
someone DOES sue and gets the tooling, we're back to square one...no one
will be able to produce the parts)?

Scott

Kyle Boatright wrote:
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote in message
...

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 08:51:02 +0100, "Rob Turk"
wrote:


"Jerry Springer" wrote in message
news:u6UWi.434$lx.263@trndny05...

Peter Nielson
Product Support Mgr.
Precision Airmotive LLC
14800 40th Ave NE
Marysville, WA 98271

360-651-8282

Subject: Letter to Industry

Here is the text of a letter we are sending out to the industry today.

Precision Airmotive LLC has discontinued sales of all float
carburetors and component parts as of November 1, 2007. This
unfortunate situation is a result of our inability to obtain products
liability insurance for the product line.

This is really sad news and scary to say the least. If it becomes a trend
then there will be ever less companies able to produce aircraft parts.
Loss
of product, loss of jobs. Maybe they should consider outsourcing their
production to a less litigious country? That would help reducing the
insurance premium.

Rob


Not if they continue to be the importer/distributor. They still need
the insurance.


There are ways around product liability. Let's say I personally buy the
assets of Precision Airmotive. Then, I create a corporation to manufacture
the parts. I (personally) retain ownership of the tooling and lease it to
the corporation which makes the parts and carbs. Also, I manage the
corporation and pay myself nicely. Funny enough, the corporation never
really builds a big asset base. Nor does it carry product liability
insurance. Therefore, it probably isn't worth suing.

Even if (when?) someone sues the corporation, it simply goes out of business
and I lease the tooling to another corporation which uses essentially the
same business model.

This is similar to how BD Maule managed Maule for years.

KB



--
Scott
http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/
Gotta Fly or Gonna Die
Building RV-4 (Super Slow Build Version)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial precision landings [email protected] Piloting 19 August 19th 06 09:51 PM
Non-precision approach without a published MAP? Peter R. Instrument Flight Rules 20 August 1st 06 08:09 AM
Why are non precision approaches not lined up? Greg Farris Instrument Flight Rules 31 October 9th 05 05:05 PM
Precision instrument flying Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 9 May 22nd 05 02:25 PM
For Sale: Precision Simulator 1.2 Mike Simulators 0 November 15th 03 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.