![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the key is for the corporation (Precision in this case) to have
no assets (hence, nothing to go after with a lawsuit), so this sounds viable. However, what if it's determined that the tooling you own were the cause of part failures. Would you personally be liable in any way? Maybe you put your tooling in an LLC or corporation, again, so that it has no assets worth sueing over (except the tooling itself...and if someone DOES sue and gets the tooling, we're back to square one...no one will be able to produce the parts)? Scott Kyle Boatright wrote: clare at snyder.on.ca wrote in message ... On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 08:51:02 +0100, "Rob Turk" wrote: "Jerry Springer" wrote in message news:u6UWi.434$lx.263@trndny05... Peter Nielson Product Support Mgr. Precision Airmotive LLC 14800 40th Ave NE Marysville, WA 98271 360-651-8282 Subject: Letter to Industry Here is the text of a letter we are sending out to the industry today. Precision Airmotive LLC has discontinued sales of all float carburetors and component parts as of November 1, 2007. This unfortunate situation is a result of our inability to obtain products liability insurance for the product line. This is really sad news and scary to say the least. If it becomes a trend then there will be ever less companies able to produce aircraft parts. Loss of product, loss of jobs. Maybe they should consider outsourcing their production to a less litigious country? That would help reducing the insurance premium. Rob Not if they continue to be the importer/distributor. They still need the insurance. There are ways around product liability. Let's say I personally buy the assets of Precision Airmotive. Then, I create a corporation to manufacture the parts. I (personally) retain ownership of the tooling and lease it to the corporation which makes the parts and carbs. Also, I manage the corporation and pay myself nicely. Funny enough, the corporation never really builds a big asset base. Nor does it carry product liability insurance. Therefore, it probably isn't worth suing. Even if (when?) someone sues the corporation, it simply goes out of business and I lease the tooling to another corporation which uses essentially the same business model. This is similar to how BD Maule managed Maule for years. KB -- Scott http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/ Gotta Fly or Gonna Die Building RV-4 (Super Slow Build Version) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial precision landings | [email protected] | Piloting | 19 | August 19th 06 09:51 PM |
Non-precision approach without a published MAP? | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | August 1st 06 08:09 AM |
Why are non precision approaches not lined up? | Greg Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 31 | October 9th 05 05:05 PM |
Precision instrument flying | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | May 22nd 05 02:25 PM |
For Sale: Precision Simulator 1.2 | Mike | Simulators | 0 | November 15th 03 10:54 PM |