![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Nyal
Entirely agree on the addictions side. On the other hand I must take issue with the theory that soaring is disruptive of family life. Apparently , since I took up soaring seriously, as opposed to the occasional flight, I am a much better person to be around. My general mood is better, and family life is smoother. Should I neglect to go flying on more than one weekend in a row, I am reminded pointedly that my soaring is suffering neglect... My 13 year old daughter is an air scout, and loves to be involved occasionally as does my son. Can't do it too often at present, because they can get bored easily, and there was a lack of nice two seaters to fly them in. I want to fly XC, the club crates are , well CRATES. So I was forced to order a two seater. According to my insurance company, soaring is less dangerous than being a hobby handyman. They load your premium if you use power tools in your garage, but not if you admit to flying gliders. Maybe I got lucky, but one assumes the quants have checked the risks. My guess is that - while active soaring is a higher risk,than being sedentary, the skills of observation and situational awareness, and self assessment learned all lower risk in other activities. Overall the insurers see no material change in risk for an active glider pilot. It would be fascinating to discover why a hand drill is more likely to cause an insurance loss. Anyone involved in the actuarial side? Bruce Nyal Williams wrote: No one has addressed the real danger of soaring; its addictive properties. I've never tried cocaine or crack or any sort of drugs, but I know it is more addictive than tobacco, caffeine, colas, or sugaars (all of which I have abandoned and am free from), and that it is disruptive to work, careers, families, and every sort of productive endeavor. Who cares?! Can't and won't quit. At 18:18 04 November 2007, Mike The Strike wrote: Years ago, I remember reading of accident and fatality figures for occupational hazards in Great Britain. At the time, professional jump jockeys were top of the list, with flat race jockeys not far behind. Both were ahead of deep-sea fishermen. The advent of North Sea oil rigs put some of their workers at the top (divers, as I recall). I don't recall any piloting professions anywhere near the top of the list. My conclusion - horses are dangerous and aircraft much less so. Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" wrote in message ... Hi Nyal According to my insurance company, soaring is less dangerous than being a hobby handyman. They load your premium if you use power tools in your garage, but not if you admit to flying gliders. Bruce Unfortunately, it may be that they just include a disclaimer in your insurance policy (assuming it's life insurance), stating that you are not covered while acting as air crew or while piloting or passenger in GA aircraft. This is common in the US and would likely be the case unless you have policy that specifically covers you while partaking in flying activities. I understand there is no such exclusion of coverage for home handymen (g). bumper |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/4/07 10:28 PM, in article
, "bumper" wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message ... Hi Nyal According to my insurance company, soaring is less dangerous than being a hobby handyman. They load your premium if you use power tools in your garage, but not if you admit to flying gliders. Bruce Unfortunately, it may be that they just include a disclaimer in your insurance policy (assuming it's life insurance), stating that you are not covered while acting as air crew or while piloting or passenger in GA aircraft. This is common in the US and would likely be the case unless you have policy that specifically covers you while partaking in flying activities. I understand there is no such exclusion of coverage for home handymen (g). bumper For what it's worth: The last time I applied for a life insurance policy, the company did not include a war exclusion (I was in the military at the time, and subject to deployment), but balked at covering me when flying gliders. It required a significant amount of discussion and negotiation to get them to cover me (they finally did). Admittedly this company caters to the military, and they wouldn't sell many policies if war were excluded from coverage, but their perception of the relative risks of soaring versus war surprised me. Bullwinkle |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Admittedly this company caters to the military, and they wouldn't sell many policies if war were excluded from coverage, but their perception of the relative risks of soaring versus war surprised me. Just a guess but maybe it was not the "perception of the relative risks", but rather the unknown risk of soaring. I suspect that their actuaries can tell you to the nth decimal place their risk of a claim due to war. Probably not so when it comes to soaring. Tony V. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bumper wrote:
Unfortunately, it may be that they just include a disclaimer in your insurance policy (assuming it's life insurance), stating that you are not covered while acting as air crew or while piloting or passenger in GA aircraft. This is common in the US and would likely be the case unless you have policy that specifically covers you while partaking in flying activities. The only policy I've seen that excludes gliding is travel insurance. It lumped gliding in with rock climbing and skiing. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Gregorie wrote:
The only policy I've seen that excludes gliding is travel insurance. It lumped gliding in with rock climbing and skiing. To me, it seems perfectly reasonable to lump gliding in with rock climbing and skiing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Martin Gregorie wrote: The only policy I've seen that excludes gliding is travel insurance. It lumped gliding in with rock climbing and skiing. To me, it seems perfectly reasonable to lump gliding in with rock climbing and skiing. I'd have thought it was a very different actuarial proposition: ski insurance pays out on lots of lesser broken bits but relatively few skiers bite the big one. But then, what do I know about selling insurance? -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Those *dangerous* Korean War relics | Kingfish | Piloting | 192 | June 19th 06 07:06 PM |
Okay, so maybe flying *is* dangerous... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 51 | August 31st 05 03:02 AM |
Dangerous Stuff | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 21 | July 16th 05 05:55 PM |
New news Soaring is dangerous ? | R Barry | Soaring | 29 | October 3rd 04 03:40 AM |
small airplanes are dangerous | JimTheBoatMan | Piloting | 31 | April 29th 04 10:44 PM |