![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the size you are using is just about right. There is enough
resolution that the picture can be saved and enlarged in an editor if a larger picture in needed. Those that post enormous pictures that you can't see the whole picture without scrolling or use special viewing software are doing the rest of us a disservice. Duxford is a great museum. I was at the 2002 and 2005 Flying Legends Air Shows and have many pictures I took of them. I have a relative who volunteers in one of the shops so get to tour the hangars when I am in England.... "®i©ardo" wrote in message news ![]() John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo -- Moving things in still pictures! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Woody wrote:
I think the size you are using is just about right. There is enough resolution that the picture can be saved and enlarged in an editor if a larger picture in needed. Those that post enormous pictures that you can't see the whole picture without scrolling or use special viewing software are doing the rest of us a disservice. Duxford is a great museum. I was at the 2002 and 2005 Flying Legends Air Shows and have many pictures I took of them. I have a relative who volunteers in one of the shops so get to tour the hangars when I am in England.... "®i©ardo" wrote in message news ![]() John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo -- Moving things in still pictures! Thanks Woody, I know that one can't please all of the people all of the time, and my size selection for my postings was done to provide an "instant access" picture for immediate enjoyment. I'm also mindful of the fact that not everyone is on broadband, and if you're not then the download time can be painful! Ricardo -- Moving things in still pictures! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Likes Bigger Craft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | August 19th 07 05:17 PM |
The BIGGER problem in the FAA exposed | JohnWayne | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | September 2nd 06 11:21 PM |
Why was the SB2C refered to as the "Beast" when the TBF was bigger? | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 29 | October 15th 05 05:51 AM |
Rumsfeld is an even bigger asshole than I thought | noname | Military Aviation | 0 | March 20th 04 03:48 AM |