|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
November 8th 07, 09:17 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
®i©ardo I sure wish your pictures were bigger
®i©ardo wrote (in part):
John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85% resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG. Mike -- Mike Mackenzie (AVCOM Services) Brisbane, AUSTRALIA Remove "XYZ" from the "Reply to" address when responding by email. 
|
|
#2
November 8th 07, 10:06 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
®i©ardo I sure wish your pictures were bigger
Mike Mackenzie wrote:
®i©ardo wrote (in part): John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85% resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG. Mike Thanks Mike, So many options... -- Moving things in still pictures!
|
|
#3
November 8th 07, 05:32 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
®i©ardo I sure wish your pictures were bigger - IMGP1214a.jpg (1/1)
In article ,
Mike Mackenzie wrote: ®i©ardo wrote (in part): John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85% resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG. Mike That's the ticket: when you resize your original file for this news group, use a larger pixel dimension and a little more compression to keep the file size down. Here's one resized to 1195 x 800 pixels, 72 dpi, and quality (compression) set to 9 in Photoshop. -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus (341- 270 BC)
|
|
#4
November 8th 07, 07:42 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
®i©ardo I sure wish your pictures were bigger - IMGP1214a.jpg (1/1)
John Meyer wrote:
In article , Mike Mackenzie wrote: ®i©ardo wrote (in part): John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85% resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG. Mike That's the ticket: when you resize your original file for this news group, use a larger pixel dimension and a little more compression to keep the file size down. Here's one resized to 1195 x 800 pixels, 72 dpi, and quality (compression) set to 9 in Photoshop. I don't remember taking that... ;-) -- Moving things in still pictures!
|
|
#5
November 8th 07, 08:27 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
®i©ardo I sure wish your pictures were bigger - IMGP1214a.jpg (1/1)
In article ,
®i©ardo wrote: John Meyer wrote: In article , Mike Mackenzie wrote: ®i©ardo wrote (in part): John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85% resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG. Mike That's the ticket: when you resize your original file for this news group, use a larger pixel dimension and a little more compression to keep the file size down. Here's one resized to 1195 x 800 pixels, 72 dpi, and quality (compression) set to 9 in Photoshop. I don't remember taking that... ;-) Hmm - must've been me then! That's at the Planes of Fame Museum in Chino. -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus (341- 270 BC)
|
|
#6
November 8th 07, 08:00 PM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
®i©ardo I sure wish your pictures were bigger - IMGP1214a.jpg (1/1)
In article ,
®i©ardo wrote: John Meyer wrote: In article , Mike Mackenzie wrote: ®i©ardo wrote (in part): John Meyer wrote: Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640 makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to 900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks like a great museum. Hi John, I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from one of my previous postings. Is the attached an improvement? Ricardo Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85% resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG. Mike That's the ticket: when you resize your original file for this news group, use a larger pixel dimension and a little more compression to keep the file size down. Here's one resized to 1195 x 800 pixels, 72 dpi, and quality (compression) set to 9 in Photoshop. I don't remember taking that... ;-) Hmm - must've been me then! That's at the Planes of Fame Museum in Chino. -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus (341- 270 BC)
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FAA Likes Bigger Craft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | August 19th 07 05:17 PM |
| The BIGGER problem in the FAA exposed | JohnWayne | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | September 2nd 06 11:21 PM |
| Why was the SB2C refered to as the "Beast" when the TBF was bigger? | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 29 | October 15th 05 05:51 AM |
| Rumsfeld is an even bigger asshole than I thought | noname | Military Aviation | 0 | March 20th 04 03:48 AM |
Hybrid Mode
