![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the Iraq biological and chemical weapons programs, look to Germany
and France who sold them most of their equipment. and US not ??? open your eyes http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0802-01.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...866942,00.html http://www.kvinnonet.org/war/WarCriminals3.html http://www.topos.org/rumsfeld.html but may be all this inforamtions are false and sure i'm a poor victim of horrible manipulation. Franck www.pegase-airshow.com www.picavia.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Franck" wrote in message
... For the Iraq biological and chemical weapons programs, look to Germany and France who sold them most of their equipment. and US not ??? open your eyes http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0802-01.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...866942,00.html http://www.kvinnonet.org/war/WarCriminals3.html http://www.topos.org/rumsfeld.html but may be all this inforamtions are false and sure i'm a poor victim of horrible manipulation. Franck There really isn't any point in arguing here. This is a guy who believes all criticism of the USA is tantamount to communist propaganda. He also believes that the situation in Iraq is currently getting better day by day, and that anyone who says different is a lefty propagandist. It just isn't worth it. (OT: I wonder if Rumsfeld himself is aware of just how evil he looks, as a former Saddam kisser?) John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm aggre with you John. I hope one day they will open their eyes
-- Franck www.pegase-airshow.com www.picavia.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Mullen" wrote: There really isn't any point in arguing here. This is a guy who believes all criticism of the USA is tantamount to communist propaganda. No, it's just "a guy" who keeps reading some very badly written stories that claim the opposite of what's actually happening in this case. He also believes that the situation in Iraq is currently getting better day by day, On the other hand, since we have actual evidence that things in Iraq *are* getting better every day, the burden is on you to prove otherwise. and that anyone who says different is a lefty propagandist. Well, in this case, it's more that the folks who fell for some of these stories are pretty far left-wing (when you see sources like Common Dreams, it's far left bordering on the Socialist at *best*). And calling some of those sites "propagandists" is being kind. It just isn't worth it. Of course it's worth it. You might actually learn something some day. Such as "you need better news sources." -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m... In article , "John Mullen" wrote: There really isn't any point in arguing here. This is a guy who believes all criticism of the USA is tantamount to communist propaganda. No, it's just "a guy" who keeps reading some very badly written stories that claim the opposite of what's actually happening in this case. 'Actually' meaning 'in your opinion, unsupported by any facts' He also believes that the situation in Iraq is currently getting better day by day, On the other hand, since we have actual evidence that things in Iraq *are* getting better every day, the burden is on you to prove otherwise. 'Actual' meaning 'in your opinion, unsupported by any facts' and that anyone who says different is a lefty propagandist. Well, in this case, it's more that the folks who fell for some of these stories are pretty far left-wing (when you see sources like Common Dreams, it's far left bordering on the Socialist at *best*). And calling some of those sites "propagandists" is being kind. It just isn't worth it. Of course it's worth it. You might actually learn something some day. Such as "you need better news sources." I might. I doubt if you will though. Sigh. John |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Franck" wrote: For the Iraq biological and chemical weapons programs, look to Germany and France who sold them most of their equipment. and US not ??? open your eyes http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0802-01.htm Nothing in that story about selling equipment for the Iraq chemical weapons program. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...866942,00.html The "materials" we sold them were *pesticides* for agricultural use. "Furthermore, in 1988, the Dow Chemical company sold $1.5m-worth (£930,000) of pesticides to Iraq despite suspicions they would be used for chemical warfare." They weren't, of course. They were *pesticides*, and not suited for use against people. No chemical weapons production materials or equipment. The anthrax samples were from the American Type Culture Collection, and have been sold for preparing vaccines since the 1920s. http://www.kvinnonet.org/war/WarCriminals3.html Nothing in this one about any suggested sales of chemical or biological warfare production equipment. http://www.topos.org/rumsfeld.html Ditto here. but may be all this inforamtions are false and sure i'm a poor victim of horrible manipulation. No, you're just a victim of doing a search for "chemical weapons iraq United States" and pasting it into your post without actually reading your "sources." -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
some other article :
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- Of course my dear. May be you live on the parallel world but sure we don't live on the same world http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2002/12/48877.html Sure mister DR meet Saddam Hussein only to take a cup of tea and discuss about the last Scharzy movie Excuse me for the offense to the honorable Mister Mickey Rumsfeld another examples : http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...sseinindex.htm http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...1231rumsfeld.h tm The US provided less conventional military equipment than British or German companies but it did allow the export of biological agents, including anthrax; vital ingredients for chemical weapons; and cluster bombs sold by a CIA front organisation in Chile, the report says. Howard Teicher, an Iraq specialist in the Reagan White House, testified in a 1995 affidavit that the then CIA director, William Casey, used a Chilean firm, Cardoen, to send cluster bombs to use against Iran's "human wave" attacks. A 1994 congressional inquiry also found that dozens of biological agents, including various strains of anthrax, had been shipped to Iraq by US companies, under licence from the commerce department. sure only for pesticide !! Furthermore, in 1988, the Dow Chemical company sold $1.5m-worth (£930,000) of pesticides to Iraq despite suspicions they would be used for chemical warfare. only for pesticide - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Franck www.pegase-airshow.com www.picavia.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
France from the air : new website | Benoit | Aerobatics | 0 | November 8th 04 09:59 AM |
please stop bashing France | Grantland | Military Aviation | 233 | October 29th 03 01:23 AM |
Russia joins France and Germany | captain! | Military Aviation | 12 | September 9th 03 09:56 AM |
France Bans the Term 'E-Mail' | bsh | Military Aviation | 38 | July 26th 03 03:18 PM |
"France downplays jet swap with Russia" | Mike | Military Aviation | 8 | July 21st 03 05:46 AM |