![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, but it IS in their legal rulings.
Helen Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Helen wrote in news:5zs_i.5854$VB6.2737@trnddc06: The FAA can interpret you logging the flight time as compensation and as such the CFI is correct. I've actually had a long chat with AOPA on this subject. I manage a light sport flight school and most of my staff are age 60+ and don't carry medicals. They'd need a second class one to ferry a plane if we paid them for their time. If they volunteer their time though, it gets gray. AOPA is pretty certain though we're OK letting them ferry planes as volunteers though just for the simple fact that the FAA would have a hard time making a case that a 68 year old 40,000 hour pilot, really considered the .5 of hobbs time as compensation he could use for his up and coming career. Assuming you aren't age 68 with 40,000 hours, you should probably avoid the ferry duty. I disagree. There's nothing in the FARs that says that flying time has a value. If you go pich up your friend's car somewhere for him it doesn't make you a taxi driver. Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helen wrote in
news:KSs_i.5976$VB6.2248@trnddc06: No, but it IS in their legal rulings. Still, can't se them making a case out of it unless they were trying to get at someone for something else that was upsetting them. I know one I can ask next time I see him, but he's the most anti FAA person I ever met, even though he's an inspector for them. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just call AOPA. All of our membership dollars pay those folks to sit
around reading the FAA legal interpretations. You'll be surprised at some of the petty cases the FAA has taken on under this rule to prosecute well meaning pilots. Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Helen wrote in news:KSs_i.5976$VB6.2248@trnddc06: No, but it IS in their legal rulings. Still, can't se them making a case out of it unless they were trying to get at someone for something else that was upsetting them. I know one I can ask next time I see him, but he's the most anti FAA person I ever met, even though he's an inspector for them. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Helen" wrote in message news:8ft_i.6111$VB6.5184@trnddc06... Just call AOPA. All of our membership dollars pay those folks to sit around reading the FAA legal interpretations. You'll be surprised at some of the petty cases the FAA has taken on under this rule to prosecute well meaning pilots. Legal interpretations are nothing, look for rulings. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helen wrote in
news:8ft_i.6111$VB6.5184@trnddc06: Just call AOPA. All of our membership dollars pay those folks to sit around reading the FAA legal interpretations. You'll be surprised at some of the petty cases the FAA has taken on under this rule to prosecute well meaning pilots. Hmm, probably wouldn't be all that surprised. OK, you sold me, though it's kind of irrelevant in my case.. OK, what about sending one of our club members up to collect an airplane that's been at a radio shop? Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. . ... OK, what about sending one of our club members up to collect an airplane that's been at a radio shop? Bertie Who is paying for the gas? -- -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . ... OK, what about sending one of our club members up to collect an airplane that's been at a radio shop? Bertie Who is paying for the gas? Pilot pays for nothing. Let's break it down into two examples then. One, he's part of a flying club, pays dues monthly, let's say he washes airplanes and what not for flying time, and in the second example he's just a friend of a guy who hasn't got time to schlepp his airplane to the field where the radio shop is. He's just doing it as a favor to the owner. I've known both of these to have happened in the distant past (with the flying club an FAA inspector was one of the members and knew) Bertie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. . "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in : "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . ... OK, what about sending one of our club members up to collect an airplane that's been at a radio shop? Bertie Who is paying for the gas? Pilot pays for nothing. Let's break it down into two examples then. One, he's part of a flying club, pays dues monthly, let's say he washes airplanes and what not for flying time, If he/she/it "paid" for this flight by working for the club - then they "paid" their own way. Not much the FAA can do. and in the second example he's just a friend of a guy who hasn't got time to schlepp his airplane to the field where the radio shop is. He's just doing it as a favor to the owner. Then he/she/it is getting "free hours" which, if someone gets a bug up their butt, could be a problem. I've known both of these to have happened in the distant past (with the flying club an FAA inspector was one of the members and knew) I'm sure it hapens a lot. I assume in these cases, the FAA inspector didn't think it was worth making a fuss about. 1 hour of "free" time? Big Whoop. On the other hand, if someone is looking for an excuse to cause trouble... There is no shortage of a-holes out there. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 13, 7:41 pm, Helen wrote:
Just call AOPA. All of our membership dollars pay those folks to sit around reading the FAA legal interpretations. You'll be surprised at some of the petty cases the FAA has taken on under this rule to prosecute well meaning pilots. Helen, the AOPA people are probably the last resource you should recomend. The ALPA legal services plan is probably not a good way to get interpritations.The staff may be well meaning, but most of them lack the qualifications and expertise to do members much good.Over the years most of the prominent aviation attorneys have dropped out of the plan. I would recomend most pilots just talk to their own attorneys if they have a question. KFB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Helen" wrote in message news:8ft_i.6111$VB6.5184@trnddc06... Just call AOPA. All of our membership dollars pay those folks to sit around reading the FAA legal interpretations. You'll be surprised at some of the petty cases the FAA has taken on under this rule to prosecute well meaning pilots. Do you have any examples? -c |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problems in a commercial flight | megaMAX | Piloting | 92 | March 23rd 07 09:45 AM |
Question on ferry flight for inspection | M | Owning | 11 | July 14th 05 08:20 PM |
Looping during a commercial flight | LordAvalon | Aerobatics | 10 | October 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Nixon on Commercial Flight | Flyin'[email protected] | Piloting | 1 | June 16th 04 05:51 PM |
Dash 80 Ferry Flight | MLenoch | Military Aviation | 1 | October 30th 03 11:55 PM |