![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Nov 2007 03:59:17 GMT, James Robinson wrote:
Dave wrote: Comments? - Both the compression of air and the use of air motors are extremely inefficient, with the compression/expansion cycle perhaps only 1/2 the efficiency of a typical gasoline engine. The effect of that on nationwide energy consumption should be obvious. - Air compressors that work above about 200 psi are very expensive. - You can't store enough energy in a reasonably-sized tank to be effective. For example, if you assume a 15 gallon tank, with 200 psi air pressure, you can accelerate a medium-sized car to about 25 mph, once. Yes, if you use a higher pressure you will get more work, but you have a long way to go to get the equivalent energy stored in a tank of gasoline. Or even approach the energy stored in the electric car's battery. Roger (K8RI) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compressed air as fuel? | Dancing Fingers | Home Built | 15 | July 14th 07 07:20 AM |
Electric DG | Robbie S. | Owning | 0 | March 19th 05 03:20 AM |
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? | nuke | Home Built | 8 | July 30th 03 12:36 PM |
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? | Gil G. | Rotorcraft | 9 | July 30th 03 12:36 PM |
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? | nuke | Rotorcraft | 0 | July 28th 03 12:52 AM |