A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

$98 per barrel oil



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th 07, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default $98 per barrel oil

Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes:

The fact that there were no attacks just proves how good we were at
protecting it.


The fact that no elephants pass through my apartment just proves how
effective my refrigerator is at keeping them out.



So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western Europe
during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever attemped to take
over Western Europe?


  #2  
Old November 15th 07, 04:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default $98 per barrel oil

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western Europe
during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever attemped to take
over Western Europe?


I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact countries
if the USSR had not been protecting them?
  #3  
Old November 15th 07, 09:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default $98 per barrel oil

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western
Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever
attemped to take over Western Europe?


I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact
countries if the USSR had not been protecting them?





Good grief.


Bertie

  #4  
Old November 15th 07, 01:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default $98 per barrel oil

Wolfgang Schwanke wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western
Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever
attemped to take over Western Europe?

I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact
countries if the USSR had not been protecting them?


Good grief.


Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the
Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent
attack by NATO.



Problem is, none of his points come from anywhere but Wikipedia.

His "viewpoint" is pretty meaningless considering it's viewed through his
rectum.



Bertie
  #5  
Old November 15th 07, 04:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Yes - I have a name[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default $98 per barrel oil

I like this part best:

Gig 601XL Builder :

"So is it your opinion ......?"

MX:

"I don't know."

He doesn't even know his opinion.


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western
Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever
attemped to take over Western Europe?

I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact
countries if the USSR had not been protecting them?

Good grief.


Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the
Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent
attack by NATO.



Problem is, none of his points come from anywhere but Wikipedia.

His "viewpoint" is pretty meaningless considering it's viewed through his
rectum.



Bertie



  #6  
Old November 15th 07, 08:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 96
Default $98 per barrel oil


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western
Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever
attemped to take over Western Europe?

I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact
countries if the USSR had not been protecting them?

Good grief.


Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the
Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent
attack by NATO.



Problem is, none of his points come from anywhere but Wikipedia.

His "viewpoint" is pretty meaningless considering it's viewed through his
rectum.


Phew. I was beginning to worry that your replies were actually sensible, but
it's good to see you're back on track. ;-)


  #7  
Old November 15th 07, 08:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default $98 per barrel oil

"Snowbird" wrote in
i.fi:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect
Western Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still
not ever attemped to take over Western Europe?

I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw
Pact countries if the USSR had not been protecting them?

Good grief.

Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV
the Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an
imminent attack by NATO.



Problem is, none of his points come from anywhere but Wikipedia.

His "viewpoint" is pretty meaningless considering it's viewed through
his rectum.


Phew. I was beginning to worry that your replies were actually
sensible, but it's good to see you're back on track. ;-)




Hey, I have occasional lapses.

I'm only Bunyip.


Bertie
  #8  
Old November 15th 07, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default $98 per barrel oil

Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

So is it your opinion that had the US not sworn to protect Western
Europe during the cold war the USSR would probably still not ever
attemped to take over Western Europe?

I don't know. Would the US have attempted to take over Warsaw Pact
countries if the USSR had not been protecting them?


Good grief.


Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the
Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent
attack by NATO.


Really, you think so? I love revisionist history.


  #9  
Old November 15th 07, 02:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default $98 per barrel oil

Mx has a point. The situation was symmetrical, i.e. from their POV the
Warsaw Pact thought they were "protecting" themselves from an imminent
attack by NATO.


Really, you think so? I love revisionist history.


Apparently German schools are teaching the same type of relativistic
history ("There is no 'right' or 'wrong' -- just various shades of
gray") that American schools are starting to inflict on our kids.

Wolfgang is a free man today, and can believe whatever he wants,
precisely BECAUSE of what our parents and grandparents did for him.
Perhaps someday he'll come to understand that...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"
  #10  
Old November 15th 07, 03:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default $98 per barrel oil

Jay,

Apparently German schools are teaching the same type of relativistic
history ("There is no 'right' or 'wrong' -- just various shades of
gray") that American schools are starting to inflict on our kids.


And how, pray, tell, would you know?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Myth: 1 G barrel rolls are impossible. Jim Logajan Piloting 244 June 22nd 07 04:33 AM
barrel roll in 172 Andrey Serbinenko Piloting 154 August 20th 06 04:11 AM
Bomb in a pickle barrel from 10,000 feet ArtKramr Military Aviation 15 September 3rd 04 05:51 PM
Barrel roll And g's Quest. Robert11 Aerobatics 6 July 16th 03 02:51 PM
Barrel Roll And g's Quest. Robert11 General Aviation 6 July 12th 03 01:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.