![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Every now and then at some of our shows I'd get a chance to sit down and jaw awhile with the Formula 1 race pilots. Steve Whittman was at a few of these ("war stories" gab sessions) Steve had some amazing stuff from the "old days", and would have us all laughing like idiots telling us about flying some of the old planes. I actually got a taste of what he was talking about when I flew a Cassutt race plane one afternoon. Actually, you don't really FLY a Cassutt, you WEAR a Cassutt :-) Even the Pitts wasn't as sensitive on the controls as that beast. But it was great fun and I caught on quickly after it scared the s**t out of me on take off. I rotated and went to 100 feet before I could ease off the tiny bit of back pressure I had used to do that :-)) In my opinion, the guys who flew those early planes were REAL pilots!! :-)) You were lucky to have met him. I'd seen him at Oshkosh and sun n fun a few times, but wasn't part ofthe elite that got to meet him. Elite? Not THIS bunch!! More like us being us covered from head to foot with engine oil and hydraulic fluid and all of dying for a cold coke with Whittman the only guy there with enough loose change for the battered old coke machine in the back of the hangar:-)) You know what i mean... Any of those things had to be a handful. the fuselage area, even on the inline engined ones, was vast ahead of the CG and the tail surfaces tiny. Add that to some fairly sensitive wings and pilots with fairly limited experience in low performance airplanes and it's a wonder that any of them survived! Lots didn't, of course. Bertie Yeah, true enough. Even Whittman came to a tragic end after all he had accomplished and done. I seem to recall hearing both he and his wife died when the fabric failed on their Tailwind some years back. Yes, hard to believe that such an experienced builder could make such an elementery mistake. He was using some sort of tight weave nylon covering, and , as you did with cotton in the past, just doped it onto the wood sheeted wing of his tailwind. It bubbled up in flight, not having properly adhered to the surface. this happened to a friend of my father's in a Cessna Bobcat many years ago. His son and he made a repair and then went flying as soon as the dope dried. They were alarmed to see a large bubble forming in the upper surface of the wing as they motored along. They got away with it though.. Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Every now and then at some of our shows I'd get a chance to sit down and jaw awhile with the Formula 1 race pilots. Steve Whittman was at a few of these ("war stories" gab sessions) Steve had some amazing stuff from the "old days", and would have us all laughing like idiots telling us about flying some of the old planes. I actually got a taste of what he was talking about when I flew a Cassutt race plane one afternoon. Actually, you don't really FLY a Cassutt, you WEAR a Cassutt :-) Even the Pitts wasn't as sensitive on the controls as that beast. But it was great fun and I caught on quickly after it scared the s**t out of me on take off. I rotated and went to 100 feet before I could ease off the tiny bit of back pressure I had used to do that :-)) In my opinion, the guys who flew those early planes were REAL pilots!! :-)) You were lucky to have met him. I'd seen him at Oshkosh and sun n fun a few times, but wasn't part ofthe elite that got to meet him. Elite? Not THIS bunch!! More like us being us covered from head to foot with engine oil and hydraulic fluid and all of dying for a cold coke with Whittman the only guy there with enough loose change for the battered old coke machine in the back of the hangar:-)) You know what i mean... Any of those things had to be a handful. the fuselage area, even on the inline engined ones, was vast ahead of the CG and the tail surfaces tiny. Add that to some fairly sensitive wings and pilots with fairly limited experience in low performance airplanes and it's a wonder that any of them survived! Lots didn't, of course. Bertie Yeah, true enough. Even Whittman came to a tragic end after all he had accomplished and done. I seem to recall hearing both he and his wife died when the fabric failed on their Tailwind some years back. Yes, hard to believe that such an experienced builder could make such an elementery mistake. He was using some sort of tight weave nylon covering, and , as you did with cotton in the past, just doped it onto the wood sheeted wing of his tailwind. It bubbled up in flight, not having properly adhered to the surface. A real shame. Such a sad end for such a talented guy. If anything, what happened should serve as a constant reminder of the inherent dangers involved in aviation and that no matter how long we've been in it, and no matter how much we know and have experienced, it can rise up and bite us in the ass at the exact instant we let our duard down and become complacent. I know it was that way for me anyway. I never once lost that slight "edge" of awareness that danger was there with me wherever I went. This "feeling" actually got stronger as the years went by. I've always felt that this single thing is what managed to get me here, sitting in the den retired with it all behind me, but SAFELY behind me :-)) this happened to a friend of my father's in a Cessna Bobcat many years ago. His son and he made a repair and then went flying as soon as the dope dried. They were alarmed to see a large bubble forming in the upper surface of the wing as they motored along. They got away with it though.. Bertie Ah yes, the old UC78 Bamboo Bomber??? I still remember Sky King from when I was a bit "younger". Never got to fly one, but heard it was a fine old airplane indeed. -- Dudley Henriques |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Every now and then at some of our shows I'd get a chance to sit down and jaw awhile with the Formula 1 race pilots. Steve Whittman was at a few of these ("war stories" gab sessions) Steve had some amazing stuff from the "old days", and would have us all laughing like idiots telling us about flying some of the old planes. I actually got a taste of what he was talking about when I flew a Cassutt race plane one afternoon. Actually, you don't really FLY a Cassutt, you WEAR a Cassutt :-) Even the Pitts wasn't as sensitive on the controls as that beast. But it was great fun and I caught on quickly after it scared the s**t out of me on take off. I rotated and went to 100 feet before I could ease off the tiny bit of back pressure I had used to do that :-)) In my opinion, the guys who flew those early planes were REAL pilots!! :-)) You were lucky to have met him. I'd seen him at Oshkosh and sun n fun a few times, but wasn't part ofthe elite that got to meet him. Elite? Not THIS bunch!! More like us being us covered from head to foot with engine oil and hydraulic fluid and all of dying for a cold coke with Whittman the only guy there with enough loose change for the battered old coke machine in the back of the hangar:-)) You know what i mean... Any of those things had to be a handful. the fuselage area, even on the inline engined ones, was vast ahead of the CG and the tail surfaces tiny. Add that to some fairly sensitive wings and pilots with fairly limited experience in low performance airplanes and it's a wonder that any of them survived! Lots didn't, of course. Bertie Yeah, true enough. Even Whittman came to a tragic end after all he had accomplished and done. I seem to recall hearing both he and his wife died when the fabric failed on their Tailwind some years back. Yes, hard to believe that such an experienced builder could make such an elementery mistake. He was using some sort of tight weave nylon covering, and , as you did with cotton in the past, just doped it onto the wood sheeted wing of his tailwind. It bubbled up in flight, not having properly adhered to the surface. A real shame. Such a sad end for such a talented guy. If anything, what happened should serve as a constant reminder of the inherent dangers involved in aviation and that no matter how long we've been in it, and no matter how much we know and have experienced, it can rise up and bite us in the ass at the exact instant we let our duard down and become complacent. I know it was that way for me anyway. I never once lost that slight "edge" of awareness that danger was there with me wherever I went. This "feeling" actually got stronger as the years went by. I've always felt that this single thing is what managed to get me here, sitting in the den retired with it all behind me, but SAFELY behind me :-)) Yeah,every once in a while I learn something that is so big and so fundamental that it frightens me that I'd been flying around in ignorance of it for so long and worse, makes me wonder what else I might be flying around not knowing.. this happened to a friend of my father's in a Cessna Bobcat many years ago. His son and he made a repair and then went flying as soon as the dope dried. They were alarmed to see a large bubble forming in the upper surface of the wing as they motored along. They got away with it though.. Bertie Ah yes, the old UC78 Bamboo Bomber??? I still remember Sky King from when I was a bit "younger". Never got to fly one, but heard it was a fine old airplane indeed. Yeah, not many left now. A buddy of mine nearly bought one with his brother when they were both fairly young, but they walked away from it because of the daunting task of rebuidling the wing. The friend of my dad's from the story had sold his by the time I'd gotten into his neighbothood, but I did get a ride in his Apache. My first in a light twin. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Yeah,every once in a while I learn something that is so big and so fundamental that it frightens me that I'd been flying around in ignorance of it for so long and worse, makes me wonder what else I might be flying around not knowing.. It's amazing the crap we all pull off while flying without killing ourselves. I should have been dead years ago with some of the boners I've pulled off in my life :-)) Yeah, not many left now. A buddy of mine nearly bought one with his brother when they were both fairly young, but they walked away from it because of the daunting task of rebuidling the wing. The friend of my dad's from the story had sold his by the time I'd gotten into his neighbothood, but I did get a ride in his Apache. My first in a light twin. Bertie Had a buddy once who bought a 150 Apache. He had trouble fining an FAA type to go flying with him. They liked it with both fans running, but giving a flight test in it was another matter :-)) -- Dudley Henriques |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Yeah,every once in a while I learn something that is so big and so fundamental that it frightens me that I'd been flying around in ignorance of it for so long and worse, makes me wonder what else I might be flying around not knowing.. It's amazing the crap we all pull off while flying without killing ourselves. I should have been dead years ago with some of the boners I've pulled off in my life :-)) Yeah, not many left now. A buddy of mine nearly bought one with his brother when they were both fairly young, but they walked away from it because of the daunting task of rebuidling the wing. The friend of my dad's from the story had sold his by the time I'd gotten into his neighbothood, but I did get a ride in his Apache. My first in a light twin. Bertie Had a buddy once who bought a 150 Apache. He had trouble fining an FAA type to go flying with him. They liked it with both fans running, but giving a flight test in it was another matter :-)) What? You're kidding? They were the perfect trainer and probably the safest thing to do flight tests in. It was the only light twin ever certified for spins (later revoked). The thing about them was that you had to do everything right or they wouldn't go up, even light, but more importantly, as a trainerm they were less likely to kill you than any other light twin if the student got it horribly wrong. For instance, if you got a failure on the left,( I think, it;s been a while) during takeoff and you had to go, you had to pump the gear up manually. If you lost the left whilst going around, you also had to get the flaps up using the same hand pump. So, the pocedure was to quickly select the flaps first so they would blow up due to aerodynamic load and save you the trouble, then start pumping like hell to get the gear up. You had already caged the engine, of course. A VMC roll was very progressive, and if you were doing those at altitude you could let them develop well past the point you could with any other light twin I know of and even if it rolled over on you it was entirely recoverable. During my own MEI checkride the FAA inspector wasn't happy with my VMC demos. They weren't agressive enough to suit him. We were doing these relatively low, BTW, due to overcast. He took it form me and suggested that I had to really show the student what a divergence was all about. Long story short he got it wrong and we did about 3/4 turn before we recovered. That wouldn't have been a happy ending in a Twin Commanche. I remember reading that Cessna's chief test pilot was demonstrating the T-50 Bobcat to the FAA for certification. He went through all the manuevers required for the inspector and after the tests were all done, casually mentioned that he didn't have a multi-engine rating and could the inspector sign him off fo one. The inspector went nuts, but eventually decided that the guy hadn't actually violated any rules technically, and that the three days of flight testing had actually been a pretty good flight test, so he obliged... Oh, and Larry, before you start looking to get the guys prosecuted, this would have been in 1940 or so when the rules were different and they're both prolly dead anyway.. .. Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Bertie Had a buddy once who bought a 150 Apache. He had trouble fining an FAA type to go flying with him. They liked it with both fans running, but giving a flight test in it was another matter :-)) What? You're kidding? They were the perfect trainer and probably the safest thing to do flight tests in. It was the only light twin ever certified for spins (later revoked). The thing about them was that you had to do everything right or they wouldn't go up, even light, but more importantly, as a trainerm they were less likely to kill you than any other light twin if the student got it horribly wrong. I've not time in the 150 myself. It's a fact that the FAA wasn't all that happy about flying with him in it; a lot of fuss about issues below VMC un certain conditions. Apparently a couple of the fuzz folks had problems giving flight tests in it...but you know the FAA :-)) -- Dudley Henriques |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Bertie Had a buddy once who bought a 150 Apache. He had trouble fining an FAA type to go flying with him. They liked it with both fans running, but giving a flight test in it was another matter :-)) What? You're kidding? They were the perfect trainer and probably the safest thing to do flight tests in. It was the only light twin ever certified for spins (later revoked). The thing about them was that you had to do everything right or they wouldn't go up, even light, but more importantly, as a trainerm they were less likely to kill you than any other light twin if the student got it horribly wrong. I've not time in the 150 myself. It's a fact that the FAA wasn't all that happy about flying with him in it; a lot of fuss about issues below VMC un certain conditions. Apparently a couple of the fuzz folks had problems giving flight tests in it...but you know the FAA :-)) Well, the guy I was with seemed to prefer it, but that was a while back, of course. I don't see the current crop being all that much better, really, and the apache was so docile..... Never flew a 235 but that should have been streets better. Flew an Aztec a few tims, but not enought to get a handle on it. The 310 would have ahd a much narrower comfort envelope than the apache, for instance, even though it went up better on one at training weights. Likewise the Baron and just about anything else I can think of. I was an observer on a DC-3 training flight where it departed during a VMC demo. I was standing in between them and hungover as bedamned. Ugh, getting nauseous just thinking about it. #Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Pilot Watch for $100? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 28 | November 18th 07 08:51 AM |
Watch out for the FBI . . . | Rich S.[_1_] | Home Built | 9 | June 23rd 07 02:42 PM |
Pilot watch not a real EB6 | BillJosephson | Piloting | 12 | March 18th 07 04:16 AM |
Looking for a watch... | Darrel Toepfer | Rotorcraft | 1 | November 8th 04 09:42 PM |
AOPA ZULU Time Pilot watch on eBay | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | October 13th 03 06:40 PM |