SR 71, Shul's writing, and a question.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Tina writes:

I mostly publish in the professional literature, but choose to not
offer a CV here. There's ample evidence you have difficulty
understanding even fairly simple writings based on opinions you've
expressed here, so the bet to make is you'd really misrepresent what
you might read in peer reviewed journals.

The U.S. Code isn't a peer-reviewed journal.


Wrong again moron.

Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Alric Knebel writes:

YOU think I don't know that? Hey, K00k, is Vagina copywrtited too?

I assume you mean protected by copyright. Individual words cannot be
protected by copyright.



How about if you spell 'em fjunny, fjukkwit?


Bertie

Jay Honeck writes:

Personally, I think anyone trying to sell a book for $400 is bonkers
-- but if ya can get it, it's not a bad gig.

See http://www.taschen.com.

It's clear you misread the code as well -- or perhaps you have never
read it (and of course it is not published as a joiurnal, but it also
is subject to peer review). In my profession we need more than a
casual knowledge of those chapters.

The other truth is, you probably hold more copyrights than I do --
5800 of them for this newsgroup alone. Those writings, however, are
not peer reviewed because I think most here would be insulted to be
called your peer.

As to the relative worth of our writings? To quote another frequent
poster, Bertie:

"hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahha"

Sorry, casual reader, if you inhaled coffee.





On Nov 18, 11:01 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tina writes:
I mostly publish in the professional literature, but choose to not
offer a CV here. There's ample evidence you have difficulty
understanding even fairly simple writings based on opinions you've
expressed here, so the bet to make is you'd really misrepresent what
you might read in peer reviewed journals.

The U.S. Code isn't a peer-reviewed journal.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Jay Honeck writes:

Personally, I think anyone trying to sell a book for $400 is bonkers
-- but if ya can get it, it's not a bad gig.

See http://www.taschen.com.



Soemthing else you can't afford.

Like gum!




Bertie

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:07:56 -0500, Alric Knebel wrote:

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:26:15 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:

Tina writes:

The following text is from Brian Shul's Sled Driver, his memoir of
flying the SR-71. It's a great read, and most of us has seen parts of
it before.

It's protected by copyright, too, which you might try to keep in mind.
YOU think I don't know that? Hey, K00k, is Vagina copywrtited too?

it's not fukken copywritted Alldick but it's a proud family name. I've been
called pussy all my life and I sorta like. Everybudy hates you now Alldick
so why don't you jus disappear.
--
http://tinyurl.com/zd6fy

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:09:48 -0500, Alric Knebel wrote:

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:20:15 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:

Tina writes:

One may quote copywritten work (been there, and do that
professionally) so long as it complies with Sections 107-118 of the
code.

The applicability of 17 USC 107 is questionable; and I don't see how the other
sections apply at all.

In what capacity do you do this professionally? When I've done it
professionally, we've always spelled it copyright, since copywrite means
something entirely different, unrelated to IP, and confusing the two raises a
lot of legal issues.

Shul's signed limited edition book sells for something over $400,
there are less expensive versions available. It's unlikely Mx owns any
version, since we know from other of his writings he has very little
income.

I have a hardcover copy of the book. I don't remember if it's signed and I
don't have it in front of me. I don't think proceeds from the book have made
Shul rich, and further eroding its commercial value by quoting massive
excerpts from it in an archived, public, worldwide forum hardly seems ethical.
Next thing you know, someone will be posting scans of the (excellent) photos
in the book.

Of course you don't what a surprise. Like all those other books you have
read and written.

Prove it. Fancy pants.

How can i? I suppose just because you have good taste in books means you
have the rite to snub mine. but both my books were pretty good what you'd
call in in the rite frame of mine, cult classics.

--
http://tinyurl.com/zd6fy

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:02:24 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:

Alric Knebel writes:

YOU think I don't know that? Hey, K00k, is Vagina copywrtited too?

I assume you mean protected by copyright. Individual words cannot be
protected by copyright.

How about this one?

**** off.
--
Alric Knebel

http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Jay Honeck writes:

Personally, I think anyone trying to sell a book for $400 is bonkers
-- but if ya can get it, it's not a bad gig.

See http://www.taschen.com.



Soemthing else you can't afford.

Like gum!




Bertie

....or a clue.

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:16:54 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

I won't pay TWO Nickels for a book from a man who calls himself
"Vagina"

So Bush's autobiography will be out as well, eh?

Bertie

oops, got my posters confused. Sorry Shul.
--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!