A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

61.113 and expense reimbursements



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th 07, 11:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements


"F. Baum" wrote in message
...
On Nov 19, 11:38 am, Ron Garret wrote:
I'm a private pilot. If I fly myself to a business meeting for a
company that I work for and they reimburse me for the cost of the
flight, have I violated FAR 61.113?

RG,
A question similar to this came up a short while ago and it produced
all manor of interpritations of 61.113. The fact of the matter is that
the FAA doesnt consistently interprate thier own rules. Anyone here
who can tell you otherwise on Usnet is only stating opinion. Reread
paragragh B and if you still have questions ask an aviation attorney.
KF Baum

And on that subject, ask AOPA. That is part of why your membership is so
valuable!

Peter



  #2  
Old November 20th 07, 12:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
F. Baum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

On Nov 19, 4:12 pm, "Peter Dohm" wrote:
RG,

Reread
paragragh B and if you still have questions ask an aviation attorney.
KF Baum


And on that subject, ask AOPA. That is part of why your membership is so
valuable!


Peter, I dont think AOPA can do much for you in this case. In cases I
have heard about, they have not been very helpful and I think they
would only be guessing also. I still think an Aviation Attorney would
be the way to go.
F Baum
  #3  
Old November 20th 07, 02:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements


"F. Baum" wrote in message
...
On Nov 19, 4:12 pm, "Peter Dohm" wrote:
RG,

Reread
paragragh B and if you still have questions ask an aviation attorney.
KF Baum


And on that subject, ask AOPA. That is part of why your membership is so
valuable!


Peter, I dont think AOPA can do much for you in this case. In cases I
have heard about, they have not been very helpful and I think they
would only be guessing also. I still think an Aviation Attorney would
be the way to go.
F Baum


You may very well be right.

Peter



  #4  
Old November 20th 07, 05:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

Let's cut through the horse****.

I'm a private pilot (no, I'm a commercial pilot, CFI, A&P, IA but let that
go for the moment).

My company sends me to a conference. The company policy pays IRS mileage
(48.5c a mile) for me to get there by private vehicle. Vehicle is
automobile, wagon train, muleback, or any other method I choose.

The company policy says that I can go by myself or carry as many other
employees as I wish in my private vehicle for the same 48.5 cents a mile.

I load up Gerry, Kelly, Sam and myself into the airplane and fly to the
conference. I'm not paid to get to the conference, just be a company
employee while I am at the conference.

I get home without incident.

I bill the company for what would have been automobile mileage and multiply
it by 48.5 cents a mile and submit it. Company pays. Case closed.

I have an accident on the way to or the way from the conference. Let the
lawyers sort it out. I was on company time; let the company lawyers decide
fault and such.

The FARs have relatively little to do with the process. You aren't being
paid to fly; you are being recompensated for getting yourself to the
conference and participating.

Then again, I've only been doing this for forty years, but what do I know?

Jim




--
"If you think you can, or think you can't, you're right."
--Henry Ford


  #5  
Old November 20th 07, 02:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

RST Engineering wrote:
Let's cut through the horse****.

I'm a private pilot (no, I'm a commercial pilot, CFI, A&P, IA but let
that go for the moment).

My company sends me to a conference. The company policy pays IRS
mileage (48.5c a mile) for me to get there by private vehicle. Vehicle is
automobile, wagon train, muleback, or any other method I
choose.
The company policy says that I can go by myself or carry as many other
employees as I wish in my private vehicle for the same 48.5 cents a
mile.
I load up Gerry, Kelly, Sam and myself into the airplane and fly to
the conference. I'm not paid to get to the conference, just be a
company employee while I am at the conference.

I get home without incident.

I bill the company for what would have been automobile mileage and
multiply it by 48.5 cents a mile and submit it. Company pays. Case
closed.


Let's modify that some and see if it would still be FAA legal.

Gerry, Kelly and same get the same 48.5c/mile from the company and give it
to you.


  #6  
Old November 20th 07, 02:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 723
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

Recently, Gig 601XL Builder wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net posted:

RST Engineering wrote:
Let's cut through the horse****.

I'm a private pilot (no, I'm a commercial pilot, CFI, A&P, IA but let
that go for the moment).

My company sends me to a conference. The company policy pays IRS
mileage (48.5c a mile) for me to get there by private vehicle.
Vehicle is automobile, wagon train, muleback, or any other method I
choose.
The company policy says that I can go by myself or carry as many
other employees as I wish in my private vehicle for the same 48.5
cents a mile.
I load up Gerry, Kelly, Sam and myself into the airplane and fly to
the conference. I'm not paid to get to the conference, just be a
company employee while I am at the conference.

I get home without incident.

I bill the company for what would have been automobile mileage and
multiply it by 48.5 cents a mile and submit it. Company pays. Case
closed.


Let's modify that some and see if it would still be FAA legal.

Gerry, Kelly and same get the same 48.5c/mile from the company and
give it to you.

As long as the total of reimbursements are less than 50% of the cost of
the flight, it doesn't conflict with the FARs. OTOH, if someone has a bug
up their posterior and wants to hassle you, they don't have to be right or
interpret the FARs correctly.

Neil


  #7  
Old November 21st 07, 12:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

As long as the total of reimbursements are less than 50% of the cost of
the flight, it doesn't conflict with the FARs. OTOH, if someone has a bug
up their posterior and wants to hassle you, they don't have to be right or
interpret the FARs correctly.

Neil


As long as their total contribution is not more than their pro rata share of
the cost of the flight.
50% if there is only one person going with you.. but the example was three
others.

B


  #8  
Old November 21st 07, 06:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 382
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

What if Jerry, Kelly and Sam are not employees of the same company?



On Nov 20, 12:19 am, "RST Engineering"
wrote:
Let's cut through the horse****.

I'm a private pilot (no, I'm a commercial pilot, CFI, A&P, IA but let that
go for the moment).

My company sends me to a conference. The company policy pays IRS mileage
(48.5c a mile) for me to get there by private vehicle. Vehicle is
automobile, wagon train, muleback, or any other method I choose.

The company policy says that I can go by myself or carry as many other
employees as I wish in my private vehicle for the same 48.5 cents a mile.

I load up Gerry, Kelly, Sam and myself into the airplane and fly to the
conference. I'm not paid to get to the conference, just be a company
employee while I am at the conference.

I get home without incident.

I bill the company for what would have been automobile mileage and multiply
it by 48.5 cents a mile and submit it. Company pays. Case closed.

I have an accident on the way to or the way from the conference. Let the
lawyers sort it out. I was on company time; let the company lawyers decide
fault and such.

The FARs have relatively little to do with the process. You aren't being
paid to fly; you are being recompensated for getting yourself to the
conference and participating.

Then again, I've only been doing this for forty years, but what do I know?

Jim

--
"If you think you can, or think you can't, you're right."
--Henry Ford


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is expense of a new sailplane the reason? Nolaminar Soaring 0 January 7th 05 03:40 PM
expense analysis Rosspilot Owning 12 August 25th 03 03:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.