A-4 / A-7 Question

In article ,
says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it had been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many to be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep trolling on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s. My Uncle retired from Lowry
AFB as a GS-15 about 20 years ago with 33 years. I believe I will accept
his explanation over yours.

In article ,
says...

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s. My Uncle retired from Lowry
AFB as a GS-15 about 20 years ago with 33 years. I believe I will accept
his explanation over yours.

So it must have been prior to 1947 or so wasn't it ?



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,

says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it
had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many
to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep
trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my
Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s. My Uncle retired from
Lowry
AFB as a GS-15 about 20 years ago with 33 years. I believe I will
accept
his explanation over yours.

So it must have been prior to 1947 or so wasn't it ?

Your story keeps changing. Was it 1947? Or was it 1949? Or was it 1950?
You really need to review what you write before you answer.

In article ,
says...

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,

says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it
had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many
to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep
trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my
Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s. My Uncle retired from
Lowry
AFB as a GS-15 about 20 years ago with 33 years. I believe I will
accept
his explanation over yours.

So it must have been prior to 1947 or so wasn't it ?

Your story keeps changing. Was it 1947? Or was it 1949? Or was it 1950?
You really need to review what you write before you answer.

I'm not the one claiming to have seen squadron strength flights of P-38's
in the Denver area after WW2, you were.

But since you can't seem to remember the year and the USAF history office
disagree's with you....

Now about those P-38's in Korea....


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

Lo, many moons past, on Sat, 18 Oct 2003 20:20:24 -0600, a stranger
called by some "Daryl Hunt" came forth and told this
tale in us.military.army

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s. My Uncle retired from Lowry
AFB as a GS-15 about 20 years ago with 33 years. I believe I will accept
his explanation over yours.

And, of course, Daryl was drunk at the time.

Anybody else notice that whenever Daryl is pushed for facts he says he
was drunk, or "pretty young" or has some other BS excuse to cover up
the fact that he's full of crap?

--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail

WE *ARE* UMA
Lemmings 404 Local

"Daryl Hunt" wrote in message ...
"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s.

Okay, so the only basis of your arguement is a 50+ year old memory
from when you were a child? Well, I guess there's no way in the world
facts can beat that.

~Michael

"Michael" wrote in message
om...
"Daryl Hunt" wrote in message
...
"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,

says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it
had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many
to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep
trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my
Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s.

Okay, so the only basis of your arguement is a 50+ year old memory
from when you were a child? Well, I guess there's no way in the world
facts can beat that.

Facts are made up of many things. A 50 year old memory is also fact.
History, as written, 50 years later may not be the correct one. History is
written by the winners.

In article ,
says...

"Michael" wrote in message
om...
"Daryl Hunt" wrote in message
...
"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,

says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If it
had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too many
to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep
trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my
Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s.

Okay, so the only basis of your arguement is a 50+ year old memory
from when you were a child? Well, I guess there's no way in the world
facts can beat that.

Facts are made up of many things. A 50 year old memory is also fact.
History, as written, 50 years later may not be the correct one. History is
written by the winners.


A 50 year old memory is nothing more than that.

However research in the records has show you to be incorrect.





--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

"Michael" wrote in message
om...
"Daryl Hunt" wrote in message
...
"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,

says...

Nice troll, moron. I didn't say that it was a single one. If
it
had
been
one, it very well have been the Confederate AF. There were too
many
to
be
from the CAF. But I don't expect you to understand. Just keep
trolling
on
and reading those books. Just remember, those are just opinions
as
well.

I forgot, what year did you see these P-38 over the Denver area ?

I don't know what year. I was pretty young at the time. I asked my
Uncle
what they were and he stated they were P-38s.

Okay, so the only basis of your arguement is a 50+ year old memory
from when you were a child? Well, I guess there's no way in the world
facts can beat that.

Facts are made up of many things. A 50 year old memory is also fact.
History, as written, 50 years later may not be the correct one. History
is
written by the winners.


A 50 year old memory is nothing more than that.

However research in the records has show you to be incorrect.

What the records have shown is that there is many records that don't quite
agree. They disagree by a couple of years or so. If any historian were to
publish where they couldn't quite get the dates correct throughout their
accounting you would be the first to throw it out. But since you enjoy
following me around like a little puppy, I guess that doesn't apply here.