A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

61.113 and expense reimbursements



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 21st 07, 03:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

In article ,
"Neil Gould" wrote:

WHAT! If there are 4 the pro rata share of $100=$25. If there are 100
the pro rata share is $1.

pro ra·ta (pro ra't?, rä'-, rat'?)
adv.
In proportion, according to a factor that can be calculated exactly.

Your generalized application of the term "pro rata" does not account for
the 50% requirement. For example, one could easily "calculate exactly"
20% of the cost of a flight, but if that is all a private pilot pays, then
the FAA is likely to consider the other 80% paid compensation.


where is this "50%" requirement?

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

  #2  
Old November 21st 07, 04:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

I think the 50% was just made up and repeated.
Expenses for a trip that can be shared by a private pilot generally are
limited to aircraft expenses. Such things a rental cars and hotels are not
considered. A private pilot who is an salesman can take sales literature
and merchandise.

Most companies and the IRS will limit reimbursements to a standard car
mileage rate.

A CPA/attorney and consultation with the FAA in your region would be a good
idea before you make the flights.



"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
| In article ,
| "Neil Gould" wrote:
|
| WHAT! If there are 4 the pro rata share of $100=$25. If there are 100
| the pro rata share is $1.
|
| pro ra·ta (pro ra't?, rä'-, rat'?)
| adv.
| In proportion, according to a factor that can be calculated exactly.
|
| Your generalized application of the term "pro rata" does not account for
| the 50% requirement. For example, one could easily "calculate exactly"
| 20% of the cost of a flight, but if that is all a private pilot pays,
then
| the FAA is likely to consider the other 80% paid compensation.
|
| where is this "50%" requirement?
|
| --
| Bob Noel
| (goodness, please trim replies!!!)
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is expense of a new sailplane the reason? Nolaminar Soaring 0 January 7th 05 03:40 PM
expense analysis Rosspilot Owning 12 August 25th 03 03:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.