A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electric Car? How about a Compressed Air Car?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 22nd 07, 09:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Electric Car? How about a Compressed Air Car?

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:39:17 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:50:55 -0500, "Roger (K8RI)"
wrote in
:

As has been publicized, we don't have the grid capacity to support
much in the way of all electric cars. The same is true for Hydrogen.
It's either produced from fossil fuels with a lot of polluting
byproducts or takes a whale of a lot of electrical energy to produce
from water.


When/if worldwide photovoltaic production ever meets consumer demand,
you are going to see an enormous increase in solar power
installations, not only in commercial buildings, but residences as
well. Today, the excess electricity generated by a home's
photovoltaic power generating system is used to turn the electric
utility meter backwards. As electrically powered vehicles become more
mainstream, that excess solar power could be used to directly charge
vehicle batteries or for hydro-electrolysis to generate hydrogen gas
for fuel.


This doesn't change the lack of grid capacity. Ask the State of
Wisconsin which has a large wind farm. The state agreed to purchase
any electricity the grid couldn't handle. It's costing them many
millions of dollars.

We don't have the economically viable technology for all electric
vehicles to have enough range. Generating H2 with the excess energy
sounds good, but how do you generate and store enough if you don't
live in the SW?


Side benefits of residential solar power generation are the peace of
mind inherent in the redundancy of distributed (as opposed to central)
power generation and the resulting robustness against massive power
outages due to a cascade of equipment outages triggered by a
single-source failure, the ability to "thumb the eye" of oil
robber-barons, the reduction in the production of pollutants,
insurance against the inevitable increases in the price of energy, and
virtue of abandoning 19th century technology for a more enlightened
solution.


It comes down to economics and geographic location. My daughter's
husband is a consultant in the business. We sat down and figured a
hybrid system of both active and passive solar would cost me close to
$50,000 up here and unlike California we receive no subsidies for
either active or passive solar panels.

Price photovoltaic panels per KWH. The price without a subside is
enough to scare most any one off.


Alcohol is an interim solution with the hybrid being by far the most
economical and quickest to implement of the interim solutions.

As for grid capacity we are rapidly coming to the point of real time
usage monitoring with remote setback of heating and air conditioning.
Here with peak rates of about 10 cents per KWH we wouldn't see the
savings of those fortunate souls paying 38 cents during peak demand
out in the Republik of Kalafornia.

OTOH solar panels don't do us much good either.


Why? Photovoltaic panels are able to convert infrared isolation even
on cloudy days.


But that ain't much power out. it's only a small fraction of what you
get in direct sunlight and solar panels are not all that efficient at
best. Also we're 43'37" N and the days are several hours shorter up
here than in say Georgia or even California. Also you can see the
power drop due to clouds, or just due to dust and dirt collecting if
you don't clean them every couple of weeks. They also age so it's not
a one time cost. Efficiency is going up, but electricity from solar
panels is still about 3 to 5 times the cost of that from the power
grid in areas where sunlight is plentiful and the atmosphere is seldom
cloudy. Here with 10 cents per KWH and we have about 3 days a month
without some clouds it's probably more like 5 to 7 times.

And even when they do get the cost down and I expect they will, the
power grid is still limited as to the amount they can buy back (or
handle) When that point is reached the payback for power into the grid
will drop and at times they may not even accept power. As I mentioned
the wind farm in Wisconsin and their problems.

There is a Silicon plant near here that is multiplying their capacity
several times over and they just finished doubling the size of the
plant. The amount of pure Silicon coming out of there is staggering.
Wafer size has gone from 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch when I started in the
industry to a current of 14 inches or there abouts. Still the waste
of making wafers from silicon rods is over 50%. Considering it used to
be on the order of 80 to 90% that's pretty good. Many years ago when
loss was much greater they developed some new sawing techniques that
cut the waste in half. it was still tremendous, but the increase in
yield almost caused several of the suppliers to go out of business.
One did.

We still have a long way to go before solar cells become economically
viable except in some select areas.

Roger (K8RI)
  #2  
Old November 26th 07, 07:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Electric Car? How about a Compressed Air Car?

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:45:24 -0500, "Roger (K8RI)"
wrote in
:

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:39:17 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:50:55 -0500, "Roger (K8RI)"
wrote in
:

As has been publicized, we don't have the grid capacity to support
much in the way of all electric cars. The same is true for Hydrogen.
It's either produced from fossil fuels with a lot of polluting
byproducts or takes a whale of a lot of electrical energy to produce
from water.


When/if worldwide photovoltaic production ever meets consumer demand,
you are going to see an enormous increase in solar power
installations, not only in commercial buildings, but residences as
well. Today, the excess electricity generated by a home's
photovoltaic power generating system is used to turn the electric
utility meter backwards. As electrically powered vehicles become more
mainstream, that excess solar power could be used to directly charge
vehicle batteries or for hydro-electrolysis to generate hydrogen gas
for fuel.


This doesn't change the lack of grid capacity.


If the home's photovoltaic power generating system is used to turn the
electric utility meter backwards, it doesn't require any additional
grid capacity.

We don't have the economically viable technology for all electric
vehicles to have enough range. Generating H2 with the excess energy
sounds good, but how do you generate and store enough if you don't
live in the SW?


Here's how it's being done in New York:


http://www.distributed-energy.com/da...gy-20329-1.pdf
The Solar-Hydrogen Home
The US Merchant Marine Academy and the New York Institute of
Technology joined forces to build a home for the 2005 Department
of Energy Solar Decathlon Competition. The home, which
incorporated a Distributed Energy Systems’ HOGEN RE hydrogen
generator, was in a class of its own. In a typical “off-grid”
scenario, a large battery bank is required to store energy. In the
“solar-hydrogen” home, solar energy is stored in the form of
hydrogen gas generated from the HOGEN RE hydrogen generator.
When it is dark, instead of drawing energy from a battery bank,
hydrogen gas is converted into electricity through a fuel cell.
During the day when there is plenty of energy from the sun, water
is converted into hydrogen gas through the use of a HOGEN RE
hydrogen generator.


Side benefits of residential solar power generation are the peace of
mind inherent in the redundancy of distributed (as opposed to central)
power generation and the resulting robustness against massive power
outages due to a cascade of equipment outages triggered by a
single-source failure, the ability to "thumb the eye" of oil
robber-barons, the reduction in the production of pollutants,
insurance against the inevitable increases in the price of energy, and
virtue of abandoning 19th century technology for a more enlightened
solution.


It comes down to economics and geographic location. My daughter's
husband is a consultant in the business. We sat down and figured a
hybrid system of both active and passive solar would cost me close to
$50,000 up here and unlike California we receive no subsidies for
either active or passive solar panels.

Price photovoltaic panels per KWH. The price without a subside is
enough to scare most any one off.


That's because the demand for photovoltaic panels exceeds the
worldwide manufacturing capacity. As more manufacturing facilities
come on-line, I would expect to see prices decline due to competition.


Alcohol is an interim solution with the hybrid being by far the most
economical and quickest to implement of the interim solutions.

As for grid capacity we are rapidly coming to the point of real time
usage monitoring with remote setback of heating and air conditioning.
Here with peak rates of about 10 cents per KWH we wouldn't see the
savings of those fortunate souls paying 38 cents during peak demand
out in the Republik of Kalafornia.

OTOH solar panels don't do us much good either.


Why? Photovoltaic panels are able to convert infrared isolation even
on cloudy days.


But that ain't much power out. it's only a small fraction of what you
get in direct sunlight and solar panels are not all that efficient at
best.


You can purchase ~40% efficient solar cells today. The technology is
improving.

Also we're 43'37" N and the days are several hours shorter up
here than in say Georgia or even California. Also you can see the
power drop due to clouds, or just due to dust and dirt collecting if
you don't clean them every couple of weeks. They also age so it's not
a one time cost. Efficiency is going up, but electricity from solar
panels is still about 3 to 5 times the cost of that from the power
grid in areas where sunlight is plentiful and the atmosphere is seldom
cloudy. Here with 10 cents per KWH and we have about 3 days a month
without some clouds it's probably more like 5 to 7 times.


In that case, you'd have to increase the solar generating area to
compensate for the reduction in isolation.

And even when they do get the cost down and I expect they will, the
power grid is still limited as to the amount they can buy back (or
handle) When that point is reached the payback for power into the grid
will drop and at times they may not even accept power. As I mentioned
the wind farm in Wisconsin and their problems.


I believe it's a matter of the utility reducing their output during
periods of excess locally (solar) generated power.

There is a Silicon plant near here that is multiplying their capacity
several times over and they just finished doubling the size of the
plant. The amount of pure Silicon coming out of there is staggering.
Wafer size has gone from 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch when I started in the
industry to a current of 14 inches or there abouts. Still the waste
of making wafers from silicon rods is over 50%. Considering it used to
be on the order of 80 to 90% that's pretty good. Many years ago when
loss was much greater they developed some new sawing techniques that
cut the waste in half. it was still tremendous, but the increase in
yield almost caused several of the suppliers to go out of business.
One did.

We still have a long way to go before solar cells become economically
viable except in some select areas.

Roger (K8RI)


Perhaps, but there seems to be a definite increase in their use out
here.
  #3  
Old November 27th 07, 07:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 186
Default Electric Car? How about a Compressed Air Car?

As with any energy conversion scheme, a viable storage medium is the
key. Perhaps the hydrogen generator is what is needed.

As for the source of this energy, how about photovoltaic roof
shingles? Look at this: http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/17129/

David Johnson

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compressed air as fuel? Dancing Fingers Home Built 15 July 14th 07 07:20 AM
Electric DG Robbie S. Owning 0 March 19th 05 03:20 AM
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? nuke Home Built 8 July 30th 03 12:36 PM
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? Gil G. Rotorcraft 9 July 30th 03 12:36 PM
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? nuke Rotorcraft 0 July 28th 03 12:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.