Can I check something with you guys

"rustyknuckle" wrote in message
. net...
Glenn; I downloaded the pic from the newsgroup then the website.
The website pic was 96 dpi and the newsgroup came in at 72 dpi.
Viewing @ 300%, strangely enough the 72 dpi was a mite sharper.
I couldn't see any difference at the normal 100% view.

For what that may be worth.......

RK

OK thanks guys.
I'm going to show all these replies to the webmaster now and ask her to
explain why my images
look different. If you could just see the difference I am seeing it would
amaze you. I don't understand why it looks
that way. All the work was done on this computer. Both images are the same,
as most of you agree (although some see some
minor differences)

Oh that's weird. I just went back to the image on the website and it's
normal again ????????????????????????? WTF

God I hate computers.

Glenn,

If this happens again, consider taking a photo of the poorer quality image
on your monitor. From your description, it sounded like it was obviously
different. They looked virtually the same to me.

Jon

"Glenn" wrote in message
...

"rustyknuckle" wrote in message
. net...
Glenn; I downloaded the pic from the newsgroup then the website.
The website pic was 96 dpi and the newsgroup came in at 72 dpi.
Viewing @ 300%, strangely enough the 72 dpi was a mite sharper.
I couldn't see any difference at the normal 100% view.

For what that may be worth.......

RK

OK thanks guys.
I'm going to show all these replies to the webmaster now and ask her to
explain why my images
look different. If you could just see the difference I am seeing it would
amaze you. I don't understand why it looks
that way. All the work was done on this computer. Both images are the
same, as most of you agree (although some see some
minor differences)

Oh that's weird. I just went back to the image on the website and it's
normal again ????????????????????????? WTF

God I hate computers.