A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bad Week for Airbus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old November 25th 07, 09:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Stefan wrote in news:2d8e1$4749e94b$54487377
:

george schrieb:

Where did he mention divers and hyperbaric situations?


He claimed a rare complication.
That is the only situation imo.


You're wrong. It can happen in any decompression situation, if the
decompression is severe enough. Like e.g. in a pressurized airplane at
very high altitude which instantly looses its pressurisation.

For some-one to have 'bubbles' develop in the CNS (or anywhere else)
in an aircraft decompression you would have to had been in a
compressed state before emplaning.


You're wrong again.

Mixedup is not correct.
he has never been correct on any point he has ever raised


And again you're wrong. You may or may not like him, but sometimes even
he is correct. But then, this is probably a tad too grey for your black
and white world.


He's not correct, he's quoting stuff form books and has no understanding of
what' he's saying.
There's a difference.



Bertie
  #52  
Old November 25th 07, 09:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

nobody writes:

I guess you are simply incapable of understanding why someone would
make a sacrafice for someone else.


I'm capable of understanding that if Mommy and Daddy don't put on
their masks first, both they and their children will die.



No, you aren;'t



Bertie
  #53  
Old November 25th 07, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Bad Week for Airbus

george writes:

For some-one to have 'bubbles' develop in the CNS (or anywhere else)
in an aircraft decompression you would have to had been in a
compressed state before emplaning.


You are, because you're at a lower altitude. If you've been diving recently,
the risk is greatly increased, as there may still be extra nitrogen dissolved
in your blood, which might not come out of solution at sea level, but might do
so at 6000 feet.

Anyway, CNS complications are quite rare in all cases of decompression
sickness, fortunately.
  #54  
Old November 25th 07, 11:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

george writes:

For some-one to have 'bubbles' develop in the CNS (or anywhere else)
in an aircraft decompression you would have to had been in a
compressed state before emplaning.


You are, because you're at a lower altitude. If you've been diving
recently, the risk is greatly increased, as there may still be extra
nitrogen dissolved in your blood, which might not come out of solution
at sea level, but might do so at 6000 feet.

Anyway, CNS complications are quite rare in all cases of decompression
sickness, fortunately.




Thanks you dr fjukktard



Bertie
  #55  
Old November 25th 07, 11:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 803
Default Bad Week for Airbus

On Nov 26, 10:29 am, Stefan wrote:

You're wrong. It can happen in any decompression situation, if the
decompression is severe enough. Like e.g. in a pressurized airplane at
very high altitude which instantly looses its pressurisation.


Okay.
The aircraft has an explosive decompression event at 35,000 feet.
The crew immediately initiate a high speed descent to 12.000 feet
And all in about 3 minutes.

That 23,000 feet pressure difference is less than sea level to the 30
feet underwater level.
A diver can spent 30 minutes at 30 feet with no decompression
required.
In other words he can return from 28-30 psi to 14.7 psi (or 1
atmosphere) without harm in around 2 minutes


And again you're wrong. You may or may not like him, but sometimes even
he is correct. But then, this is probably a tad too grey for your black
and white world.


A pointer to one correct statement from mixedup at this point would
bolster your claim no end

  #56  
Old November 25th 07, 11:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Bad Week for Airbus

george schrieb:

Okay.
The aircraft has an explosive decompression event at 35,000 feet.
The crew immediately initiate a high speed descent to 12.000 feet
And all in about 3 minutes.

That 23,000 feet pressure difference is less than sea level to the 30
feet underwater level.
A diver can spent 30 minutes at 30 feet with no decompression
required.


Yo have no idea. You better inform yourself before bashing others.
  #57  
Old November 26th 07, 12:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Stefan wrote in news:4572b$474a0b35$54487377
:

george schrieb:

Okay.
The aircraft has an explosive decompression event at 35,000 feet.
The crew immediately initiate a high speed descent to 12.000 feet
And all in about 3 minutes.

That 23,000 feet pressure difference is less than sea level to the 30
feet underwater level.
A diver can spent 30 minutes at 30 feet with no decompression
required.


Yo have no idea. You better inform yourself before bashing others.


That's why Anthony comes here. There can;t be any other reason.


He can';t be left disappointed.



Bertie
  #58  
Old November 26th 07, 01:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default Bad Week for Airbus

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 02:58:09 +0000, Judah wrote:

Now SEATBELTS they explain because they think people are stupid...


No. They explain seatbelts after the plane's already started to
move...which means that everyone is already belted.

It's not the passengers' stupidity that's at issue, I fear.

- Andrew
  #59  
Old November 26th 07, 02:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default Bad Week for Airbus

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:19:25 -0800 (PST), george
wrote:

On Nov 26, 9:14 am, Stefan wrote:
george schrieb:

On Nov 25, 4:02 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Phil writes:
Amazing. I never would have guessed that you could get a spinal
injury from the decompression itself.
Bubbles in the CNS after sudden decompression can cause serious neurological
symptoms and persistent sequelae, but it's a very rare complication.


Moron strikes again.
No diver suffering DS will be flying on a commercial airliner in that
state!.
Or is our resident clown now a specialist in Hyperbaric medicine ?


Where did he mention divers and hyperbaric situations?


He claimed a rare complication.
That is the only situation imo.
I taught that dive and fly same day situations were to be avoided.
Transporting 'bent' patients by air to the nearest Hyperbaric chamber
was -always- carried out at low altitude on oxygen!

You should at
least read his posting before bashing him. You may not understand it,
but what he wrote is absolutely correct and to the point, whether you
like it or not.


For some-one to have 'bubbles' develop in the CNS (or anywhere else)
in an aircraft decompression you would have to had been in a
compressed state before emplaning.

Mixedup is not correct.
he has never been correct on any point he has ever raised



George

You are correcct. It is well documented that flying is prohibited for
24 hours after scuba diving.

Big John
  #60  
Old November 26th 07, 03:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Bad Week for Airbus


"Stefan" wrote

And again you're wrong. You may or may not like him, but sometimes even he
is correct.


Even a stopped clock (12 hour type) is right twice a day. That doesn't make
him any more useful.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
airbus - Latest Plane From Airbus.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 14 June 26th 07 09:41 AM
Which is easier: Boeing to Airbus, or Airbus to Boeing? Mxsmanic Piloting 9 February 21st 07 01:58 AM
What a week.. Capt.Doug Piloting 11 February 20th 07 03:25 AM
No NYC Fleet Week TFR? Marco Leon Piloting 8 June 1st 06 10:59 PM
This week DHeitm8612 General Aviation 0 January 21st 05 01:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.