![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ted Striker" wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:12:51 -0500, "Roger (K8RI)" wrote: Blah blah blah, now why is it your entire dissertation is all about the negatives of driving an electric car. The obvious is that you worry if electric car use becomes more widespread, you might have to pay more for your electricity. Too bad. I live in an area where the cost is 7cents a kwh, and is generated by a nuke plant. So goes your coal fired worries. And why do you think anyone else is so concerned about which fuel makes a certian amount of polution. You think whether or not it makes you happy or not is going to have any bearing on the decision to use an electric car? I'm going to get one anyway, strain the power grid charging it up, don't care how much the power company polutes making the juice to charge it up either. Not everyone is so big picture minded about the whole affair as you are. I would love to be able to get around my local area and never pull into the gas station and pay the current price of gas. IMHO, Roger's points were well taken. Most of the "solutions" we see bandied about are scams. OTOH, this is a great time to play around with both electrics and hybrids--before the limitations and problems become well known and also before both money and permits are required to turn the batteries back in. BTW, there is another form of hybrid that works quite well--using an internal combustion engine and an electric drive system. The railroads have been using them quite successfully for the past half of a century. They have tremendous pulling power at low speeds, but don't have the high speed acceleration and hill climbing power that we currently demand from our cars. So, some infrastructure changes would be needed--mostly in the form of longer acceleration ramps on the expressways. Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:54:41 -0500, "Peter Dohm"
wrote: "Ted Striker" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:12:51 -0500, "Roger (K8RI)" wrote: Hmmm...That message does not come up on the server I'm using. At any rate and in order. Blah blah blah, now why is it your entire dissertation is all about the negatives of All about the negatives of the electric car? It wasn't. It addressed both positives and negatives for now and the future. Unfortunately when looked at as a whole with the impact on society, the negatives outweigh the positives by a wide margin. driving an electric car. The obvious is that you worry if electric car use becomes more widespread, you might have to pay more for your electricity. Too bad. I live in an area I'm trying to figure if this is for real of just trolling:-)) it comes on just a bit heavy to be real, but?? You are taking what I see over all as being a personal impact statement and it's not. My statement was as to how "in general" it would affect our society, not me as an individual. I happen to be in an area with relatively cheap electricity and tend to be an "early adopter" of technology. where the cost is 7cents a kwh, and is generated by a nuke plant. So goes your coal Isn't this kinda centrist thinking? I'm talking about the general population and you are talking about ... you. fired worries. And why do you think anyone else is so concerned about which fuel makes a Stop and read the papers. The general population is up in arms about the price of gas. Wait until their electric bills are scaled up proportionally. I still pay (per month) for electricity about what I paid in 1976. Actually for a while I had an all electric home heated with ceiling cable where the bills were about $290 a month and that was somewhere in the 77-78 range. It's also several times what I pay now. Remember too, that all alternative energy sources come with some side effects. Alcohol/corn/food supply. Electric car/cost of electricity/overall cost of living "nation wide" certian amount of polution. You think whether or not it makes you happy or not is going Again, I'm talking about the general population and what they consider acceptable. Unless you believe conspiracy stories about the press and news in general, the population in general appears to be unhappy about the cost of energy and pollution. At least there are a lot of stories on the news about some one complaining. to have any bearing on the decision to use an electric car? I'm going to get one anyway, Go for it. I'm not trying to influence any ones car buying. strain the power grid charging it up, don't care how much the power company polutes Which is unfortunate as the bigger the mess we make now the more expensive it'll be to clean up and the bigger the impact on the overall economy when it's done. Sooner or later the clean up will have to be done. Resistance to conventional, coal powered plants has been high nation wide. Just in the last year plans for a big expansion of new plants was abandoned down in Texas. Resistance to running new transmission lines has been even higher. Even the governors of some Eastern states are fighting the planed "Eastern Transmission Corridor" making the juice to charge it up either. Not everyone is so big picture minded about the Not everyone, but it's a substantial number and growing. It's also this kind of thinking that has gas prices where they are now and what in a few years may be considered "the good old days. It's also more than likely to affect those who are now isolated and feel protected. Centrist thinking is why gas costs as much as it does. I do happen to believe in Nuke power as one of the alternatives, but it takes about 20 years to get any new plants on line and there are none proposed that I know of. So you could probably add about another 5 to 10 years of paper work to get one started to that 20 year build time. whole affair as you are. I would love to be able to get around my local area and never pull into the gas station and pay the current price of gas. So would I, but you are unlikely to do that very far into the future as other areas start pulling more power from your area and prices reflect supply and demand. Also, like a good hybrid you will probably pay enough more for a good all electric car that even if power remains cheap for you the over all cost of driving that car will likely be higher than it would have been using the expensive gas. However as demand goes up the power grid will start drawing power from your area into other areas. They did that to us in Michigan with natural gas a couple years back when California screwed up. They sent our reserves of cheap gas to California where they could make much more money which resulted in higher prices here. When the power companies can make more money by shipping your electricity to other areas you will be seeing new, high voltage transmission lines running out of the plant. IMHO, Roger's points were well taken. Most of the "solutions" we see bandied about are scams. And the ones that aren't come with "side effects",don't scale well, or are regionally dependent. Many of those side effects are unlikely to be anticipated. Rarely does anything come with less side effects than expected. OTOH, this is a great time to play around with both electrics and hybrids--before the limitations and problems become well known and also before both money and permits are required to turn the batteries back in. Even now the cheapest way to get rid of a big battery pack it to take it to an auto dealer. Notice how auto parts dealers now also serve as used oil collection places. BTW, there is another form of hybrid that works quite well--using an internal combustion engine and an electric drive system. The railroads have been using them quite successfully for the past half of a century. They have tremendous pulling power at low speeds, but don't have the high speed acceleration and hill climbing power that we currently demand from our cars. So, some infrastructure changes would be needed--mostly in the form of longer acceleration ramps on the expressways. Peter Roger (K8RI) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is no troll, I've been on and off this group for years, building a Glasair 3 since
'91, but I can get frustrated when a good idea like electric cars crops up, and others just can't wait to publish their long laundry list of reasons not to do it. Your view is too large, quit tyring to solve the worlds problems. The fact is, for many years to come, electric cars will only be bought in very small numbers, and never create enough demand on "the grid" like your doom and gloom prospects paint the picture. So tinkerers like homebuilders will probably be the select few that will mess with them. Being retired from the airlines, I rarely travel far from home, and my car sits for days sometimes and doesn't move. I'd love to have an electric car for short trips. And I'm not going for some new expensive new one either. A converted conventional car is what I'm looking into.My local dump takes batteries, so their disposal isn't a problem. Plus, batteries are recycled, so your fear of disposal is groundless. Ideas never get off the ground by people that suffer from analysis paralysis. Now, if you had ever owned an electric car, and then posted some first hand knowlege of it's use, I'd be inclined to listen. But that doesn't seem to be the case at all. I'm sure an electric car could be made that could make trips a maximum of 10 miles and back. Which is about as far as I need to go. Now it would be interesting to see if they can be air conditioned for the summer. But I'd be happy to just use it the rest of the year. I'm trying to figure if this is for real of just trolling:-)) it comes on just a bit heavy to be real, but?? You are taking what I see over all as being a personal impact statement and it's not. My statement was as to how "in general" it would affect our society, not me as an individual. I happen to be in an area with relatively cheap electricity and tend to be an "early adopter" of technology. where the cost is 7cents a kwh, and is generated by a nuke plant. So goes your coal Isn't this kinda centrist thinking? I'm talking about the general population and you are talking about ... you. fired worries. And why do you think anyone else is so concerned about which fuel makes a Stop and read the papers. The general population is up in arms about the price of gas. Wait until their electric bills are scaled up proportionally. I still pay (per month) for electricity about what I paid in 1976. Actually for a while I had an all electric home heated with ceiling cable where the bills were about $290 a month and that was somewhere in the 77-78 range. It's also several times what I pay now. Remember too, that all alternative energy sources come with some side effects. Alcohol/corn/food supply. Electric car/cost of electricity/overall cost of living "nation wide" certian amount of polution. You think whether or not it makes you happy or not is going Again, I'm talking about the general population and what they consider acceptable. Unless you believe conspiracy stories about the press and news in general, the population in general appears to be unhappy about the cost of energy and pollution. At least there are a lot of stories on the news about some one complaining. to have any bearing on the decision to use an electric car? I'm going to get one anyway, Go for it. I'm not trying to influence any ones car buying. strain the power grid charging it up, don't care how much the power company polutes Which is unfortunate as the bigger the mess we make now the more expensive it'll be to clean up and the bigger the impact on the overall economy when it's done. Sooner or later the clean up will have to be done. Resistance to conventional, coal powered plants has been high nation wide. Just in the last year plans for a big expansion of new plants was abandoned down in Texas. Resistance to running new transmission lines has been even higher. Even the governors of some Eastern states are fighting the planed "Eastern Transmission Corridor" making the juice to charge it up either. Not everyone is so big picture minded about the Not everyone, but it's a substantial number and growing. It's also this kind of thinking that has gas prices where they are now and what in a few years may be considered "the good old days. It's also more than likely to affect those who are now isolated and feel protected. Centrist thinking is why gas costs as much as it does. I do happen to believe in Nuke power as one of the alternatives, but it takes about 20 years to get any new plants on line and there are none proposed that I know of. So you could probably add about another 5 to 10 years of paper work to get one started to that 20 year build time. whole affair as you are. I would love to be able to get around my local area and never pull into the gas station and pay the current price of gas. So would I, but you are unlikely to do that very far into the future as other areas start pulling more power from your area and prices reflect supply and demand. Also, like a good hybrid you will probably pay enough more for a good all electric car that even if power remains cheap for you the over all cost of driving that car will likely be higher than it would have been using the expensive gas. However as demand goes up the power grid will start drawing power from your area into other areas. They did that to us in Michigan with natural gas a couple years back when California screwed up. They sent our reserves of cheap gas to California where they could make much more money which resulted in higher prices here. When the power companies can make more money by shipping your electricity to other areas you will be seeing new, high voltage transmission lines running out of the plant. IMHO, Roger's points were well taken. Most of the "solutions" we see bandied about are scams. And the ones that aren't come with "side effects",don't scale well, or are regionally dependent. Many of those side effects are unlikely to be anticipated. Rarely does anything come with less side effects than expected. OTOH, this is a great time to play around with both electrics and hybrids--before the limitations and problems become well known and also before both money and permits are required to turn the batteries back in. Even now the cheapest way to get rid of a big battery pack it to take it to an auto dealer. Notice how auto parts dealers now also serve as used oil collection places. BTW, there is another form of hybrid that works quite well--using an internal combustion engine and an electric drive system. The railroads have been using them quite successfully for the past half of a century. They have tremendous pulling power at low speeds, but don't have the high speed acceleration and hill climbing power that we currently demand from our cars. So, some infrastructure changes would be needed--mostly in the form of longer acceleration ramps on the expressways. Peter Roger (K8RI) Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On another note, and back to this groups subject, did you notice the electric Sonex in
Kitplanes? That thing looked neat, and for local flights around the pattern, it would be fun to use. But the owner would have to strain "the grid" to charge it up. Probably hard to find a plug at the airport with the capacity to do that. My house has a 400 watt service, so even with both A/C units running, and the stove on, I can charge up an electric car just fine. Plus my shop has a 200W service added to the houses. So charging problems may be a problem for those in those old houses with 100W service, or even 60 watt if they still exist. But just about any modern house has 200 watts available. Actually, all houses should be wired for 400 watts, it cost nothing if you don't use it, but is nice to have if you need it. On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:51:14 -0500, Ted Striker wrote: This is no troll, I've been on and off this group for years, building a Glasair 3 since '91, but I can get frustrated when a good idea like electric cars crops up, and others just can't wait to publish their long laundry list of reasons not to do it. Your view is too large, quit tyring to solve the worlds problems. The fact is, for many years to come, electric cars will only be bought in very small numbers, and never create enough demand on "the grid" like your doom and gloom prospects paint the picture. So tinkerers like homebuilders will probably be the select few that will mess with them. Being retired from the airlines, I rarely travel far from home, and my car sits for days sometimes and doesn't move. I'd love to have an electric car for short trips. And I'm not going for some new expensive new one either. A converted conventional car is what I'm looking into.My local dump takes batteries, so their disposal isn't a problem. Plus, batteries are recycled, so your fear of disposal is groundless. Ideas never get off the ground by people that suffer from analysis paralysis. Now, if you had ever owned an electric car, and then posted some first hand knowlege of it's use, I'd be inclined to listen. But that doesn't seem to be the case at all. I'm sure an electric car could be made that could make trips a maximum of 10 miles and back. Which is about as far as I need to go. Now it would be interesting to see if they can be air conditioned for the summer. But I'd be happy to just use it the rest of the year. I'm trying to figure if this is for real of just trolling:-)) it comes on just a bit heavy to be real, but?? You are taking what I see over all as being a personal impact statement and it's not. My statement was as to how "in general" it would affect our society, not me as an individual. I happen to be in an area with relatively cheap electricity and tend to be an "early adopter" of technology. where the cost is 7cents a kwh, and is generated by a nuke plant. So goes your coal Isn't this kinda centrist thinking? I'm talking about the general population and you are talking about ... you. fired worries. And why do you think anyone else is so concerned about which fuel makes a Stop and read the papers. The general population is up in arms about the price of gas. Wait until their electric bills are scaled up proportionally. I still pay (per month) for electricity about what I paid in 1976. Actually for a while I had an all electric home heated with ceiling cable where the bills were about $290 a month and that was somewhere in the 77-78 range. It's also several times what I pay now. Remember too, that all alternative energy sources come with some side effects. Alcohol/corn/food supply. Electric car/cost of electricity/overall cost of living "nation wide" certian amount of polution. You think whether or not it makes you happy or not is going Again, I'm talking about the general population and what they consider acceptable. Unless you believe conspiracy stories about the press and news in general, the population in general appears to be unhappy about the cost of energy and pollution. At least there are a lot of stories on the news about some one complaining. to have any bearing on the decision to use an electric car? I'm going to get one anyway, Go for it. I'm not trying to influence any ones car buying. strain the power grid charging it up, don't care how much the power company polutes Which is unfortunate as the bigger the mess we make now the more expensive it'll be to clean up and the bigger the impact on the overall economy when it's done. Sooner or later the clean up will have to be done. Resistance to conventional, coal powered plants has been high nation wide. Just in the last year plans for a big expansion of new plants was abandoned down in Texas. Resistance to running new transmission lines has been even higher. Even the governors of some Eastern states are fighting the planed "Eastern Transmission Corridor" making the juice to charge it up either. Not everyone is so big picture minded about the Not everyone, but it's a substantial number and growing. It's also this kind of thinking that has gas prices where they are now and what in a few years may be considered "the good old days. It's also more than likely to affect those who are now isolated and feel protected. Centrist thinking is why gas costs as much as it does. I do happen to believe in Nuke power as one of the alternatives, but it takes about 20 years to get any new plants on line and there are none proposed that I know of. So you could probably add about another 5 to 10 years of paper work to get one started to that 20 year build time. whole affair as you are. I would love to be able to get around my local area and never pull into the gas station and pay the current price of gas. So would I, but you are unlikely to do that very far into the future as other areas start pulling more power from your area and prices reflect supply and demand. Also, like a good hybrid you will probably pay enough more for a good all electric car that even if power remains cheap for you the over all cost of driving that car will likely be higher than it would have been using the expensive gas. However as demand goes up the power grid will start drawing power from your area into other areas. They did that to us in Michigan with natural gas a couple years back when California screwed up. They sent our reserves of cheap gas to California where they could make much more money which resulted in higher prices here. When the power companies can make more money by shipping your electricity to other areas you will be seeing new, high voltage transmission lines running out of the plant. IMHO, Roger's points were well taken. Most of the "solutions" we see bandied about are scams. And the ones that aren't come with "side effects",don't scale well, or are regionally dependent. Many of those side effects are unlikely to be anticipated. Rarely does anything come with less side effects than expected. OTOH, this is a great time to play around with both electrics and hybrids--before the limitations and problems become well known and also before both money and permits are required to turn the batteries back in. Even now the cheapest way to get rid of a big battery pack it to take it to an auto dealer. Notice how auto parts dealers now also serve as used oil collection places. BTW, there is another form of hybrid that works quite well--using an internal combustion engine and an electric drive system. The railroads have been using them quite successfully for the past half of a century. They have tremendous pulling power at low speeds, but don't have the high speed acceleration and hill climbing power that we currently demand from our cars. So, some infrastructure changes would be needed--mostly in the form of longer acceleration ramps on the expressways. Peter Roger (K8RI) Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:01:49 -0500, Ted Striker
wrote: On another note, and back to this groups subject, did you notice the electric Sonex in Kitplanes? That thing looked neat, and for local flights around the pattern, it would be fun to use. But the owner would have to strain "the grid" to charge it up. Probably hard to find a plug at the airport with the capacity to do that. My house has a 400 watt service, so even with both A/C units running, and the stove on, I can charge up an electric car just fine. 400 watt service, eh Ted? Interesting. That's FOUR light bulbs worth @100 watt ea. Wanna' correct yourself? - Barnyard BOb - The more people I meet, the more I like my dog... and George Carlin humor. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:53:06 -0600, Barnyard BOb wrote:
Typo, 400 amps.. But there are always those that catch every typo. Do you read every last word in the newspaper also? 400 watt service, eh Ted? Interesting. That's FOUR light bulbs worth @100 watt ea. Wanna' correct yourself? - Barnyard BOb - The more people I meet, the more I like my dog... and George Carlin humor. Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I know there are electric powered sailplanes but | YouHelpBuild.com | Soaring | 12 | November 19th 07 01:57 PM |
Solar Electric Powered Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 33 | November 6th 05 08:37 PM |
Solar Electric Powered Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 31 | November 6th 05 08:37 PM |
Is a Turn Coordinator an electric motor or powered by fan? | kickinwing | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 05 12:25 PM |