Pilots are, indeed, rare...

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:10:23 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Jay Honeck wrote:
Here is the answer (well, closer than a guess) to my questions about
pilots:

See:
http://www.prb.org/Articles/2002/How...edonEarth.aspx

Using these numbers (through 2002) the best estimate is that 106
billion humans have ever lived on this planet.

If we use the estimate of 5 million pilots who have ever lived, we can
see that the number of people in history to have achieved the ability
to fly is something around .0047%, or 1 in 21,200 people...

Humans tried to fly for over 50,000 years, only figuring it out 104
years ago. In other words, for 99.8% of our history, we tried -- and
failed -- to fly. Yet, amazingly, that knowledge is now available to
anyone on the planet for the cost of a used Chevy Lumina.

That, my friends, is what we call "progress"...

;-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Actually, I believe man was capable of flying much sooner than the
Wrights. I once heard that Iron Eaglebutt Henriques, a shamonyu medicine

Are you sure? I heard it was his apprentice, leadbutt over in Africa.
It's rumored the impact was so great it created the Great Rift Valley.
OTOH some say it was their descendant (whose I'm not sure) the great
French aviator Lardbutt who attempted to emulate the famous Icarus who
flew too near the sun. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on your
view point, Lardbutt drowned shortly after realizing he should have
made the wings larger before jumping off that bridge. Lardbutt had no
descendents.


man of the world famous Gravitigotcha tribe in South America once
obtained an unassisted sustained flight of 3,212 feet between the top of
Angel Falls and the forest floor in the year 1688, marking both the need
for more efficient airfoils and for tennis shoes to be worn at the top
of the falls.

Roger (K8RI)

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:10:23 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:


Lardbutt had no
descendents.

Roger (K8RI)

Wouldn't having the wings too small have caused Lardbutt to have a
descendents issue????
--
Dudley Henriques

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:41:25 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:10:23 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:


Lardbutt had no
descendents.

Roger (K8RI)

Wouldn't having the wings too small have caused Lardbutt to have a
descendents issue????

As yes. Actually I believe they say he rapidly discovered as he was
descending, his chances of having any descendents was descending
faster than his rate of descent.

Roger (K8RI)

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:41:25 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:10:23 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Lardbutt had no
descendents.
Roger (K8RI)
Wouldn't having the wings too small have caused Lardbutt to have a
descendents issue????

As yes. Actually I believe they say he rapidly discovered as he was
descending, his chances of having any descendents was descending
faster than his rate of descent.

Roger (K8RI)

Now THAT is what I call a decent post :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:00:28 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:41:25 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:10:23 -0500, Dudley Henriques
wrote:

Lardbutt had no
descendents.
Roger (K8RI)
Wouldn't having the wings too small have caused Lardbutt to have a
descendents issue????

As yes. Actually I believe they say he rapidly discovered as he was
descending, his chances of having any descendents was descending
faster than his rate of descent.

Roger (K8RI)

Now THAT is what I call a decent post :-))
Sorry, but I think I just ran out of straight lines. Your turn again.
:-))

Roger (K8I)