![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Stewart wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Jim Stewart wrote: Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a 914? I have never had a nicer engine in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth, strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date. If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness. I've heard good things about them and it's simple physics that 6 would be smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't be a Light Sport if it had that much power. The 912 has to be derated by reducing the prop pitch as it is. What are you flying? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Jim Stewart wrote: Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Jim Stewart wrote: Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a 914? I have never had a nicer engine in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth, strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date. If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness. I've heard good things about them and it's simple physics that 6 would be smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't be a Light Sport if it had that much power. The 912 has to be derated by reducing the prop pitch as it is. What are you flying? 2006 Flight Design CTSW |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Stewart" wrote in message . .. Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Jim Stewart wrote: Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Jim Stewart wrote: Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a 914? I have never had a nicer engine in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth, strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date. If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness. I've heard good things about them and it's simple physics that 6 would be smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't be a Light Sport if it had that much power. The 912 has to be derated by reducing the prop pitch as it is. What are you flying? 2006 Flight Design CTSW/ That thing is cute! Sorry couldn't resist. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darkwing wrote:
"Jim Stewart" wrote in message . .. Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Jim Stewart wrote: Gig 601XL Builder wrote: Jim Stewart wrote: Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a 914? I have never had a nicer engine in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth, strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date. If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness. I've heard good things about them and it's simple physics that 6 would be smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't be a Light Sport if it had that much power. The 912 has to be derated by reducing the prop pitch as it is. What are you flying? 2006 Flight Design CTSW/ That thing is cute! Sorry couldn't resist. I know. My wife was joking that she's jealous that the airplane gets all the compliments. I've described it as the plane Walt Disney would have designed for the littlest mermaid. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna To Build Skycatcher Overseas Despite Cheap Dollar | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 22 | November 29th 07 01:04 AM |
Skycatcher IFR? | Matt Whiting | Owning | 57 | November 26th 07 11:59 PM |
Skycatcher to be a import. | Gig 601XL Builder | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 07 05:01 PM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 107 | September 23rd 07 01:18 AM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | miffich | Piloting | 1 | July 24th 07 12:04 AM |