A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RIP Cessna...Skycatcher



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 29th 07, 04:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

Jim Stewart wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Jim Stewart wrote:

Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a
914? I have never had a nicer engine
in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth,
strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in
cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date.




If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's
version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness.


I've heard good things about them and
it's simple physics that 6 would be
smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't
be a Light Sport if it had that much
power. The 912 has to be derated by
reducing the prop pitch as it is.


What are you flying?


  #2  
Old November 29th 07, 04:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 437
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Jim Stewart wrote:

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Jim Stewart wrote:


Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a
914? I have never had a nicer engine
in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth,
strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in
cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date.



If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's
version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness.


I've heard good things about them and
it's simple physics that 6 would be
smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't
be a Light Sport if it had that much
power. The 912 has to be derated by
reducing the prop pitch as it is.



What are you flying?


2006 Flight Design CTSW
  #3  
Old November 29th 07, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Darkwing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 604
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher


"Jim Stewart" wrote in message
. ..
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Jim Stewart wrote:

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Jim Stewart wrote:


Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a
914? I have never had a nicer engine
in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth,
strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in
cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date.



If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's
version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness.

I've heard good things about them and
it's simple physics that 6 would be
smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't
be a Light Sport if it had that much
power. The 912 has to be derated by
reducing the prop pitch as it is.



What are you flying?


2006 Flight Design CTSW/


That thing is cute! Sorry couldn't resist.


  #4  
Old November 29th 07, 07:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 437
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

Darkwing wrote:
"Jim Stewart" wrote in message
. ..
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Jim Stewart wrote:

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Jim Stewart wrote:


Have you ever flown behind a 912 or a
914? I have never had a nicer engine
in any vehicle I've owned. Smooth,
strong and light, 5 gallons an hour in
cruise, absolutely *no* issues to date.


If you want smooth you ought to fly behind a Jabiru or the poor man's
version the Corvair. 6 is better than 4 for smoothness.
I've heard good things about them and
it's simple physics that 6 would be
smoother than 4. OTOH, my plane wouldn't
be a Light Sport if it had that much
power. The 912 has to be derated by
reducing the prop pitch as it is.

What are you flying?

2006 Flight Design CTSW/


That thing is cute! Sorry couldn't resist.


I know. My wife was joking that she's
jealous that the airplane gets all the
compliments.

I've described it as the plane Walt Disney
would have designed for the littlest mermaid.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna To Build Skycatcher Overseas Despite Cheap Dollar Larry Dighera Piloting 22 November 29th 07 01:04 AM
Skycatcher IFR? Matt Whiting Owning 57 November 26th 07 11:59 PM
Skycatcher to be a import. Gig 601XL Builder Piloting 0 November 26th 07 05:01 PM
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" Jim Logajan Piloting 107 September 23rd 07 01:18 AM
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" miffich Piloting 1 July 24th 07 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.