![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 5:16 pm, (Michel Talon) wrote:
By the way, you can find the other manufacturers at the same place. Thanks for the links. I've also got the Johnson flight tests for both the 19 and the Cirrus, and again there isn't much between the two (afaik Johnson never tested the Pegase). The 19 has a slight edge, or would with equal wing loading. But IMHO handling is a factor in XC speed - the easier and more forgiving a ship is to fly, the more you can concentrate on tactics - and that can't be discerned from polars. Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan G wrote:
On Nov 29, 5:16 pm, (Michel Talon) wrote: By the way, you can find the other manufacturers at the same place. Thanks for the links. I've also got the Johnson flight tests for both the 19 and the Cirrus, and again there isn't much between the two (afaik Johnson never tested the Pegase). The 19 has a slight edge, or would with equal wing loading. But IMHO handling is a factor in XC speed - the easier and more forgiving a ship is to fly, the more you can concentrate on tactics - and that can't be discerned from polars. Dan You may have discovered my bias from my previous post, but as much as i liked the ASW15, i disliked the ASW19. For me, it has bad handling, doesn't climb well. I have flewn the Libelle, the Cirrus, the LS1, LS3, LS4 and many others, and liked them, but not the 19. Of course this is very dependant on each individual, because i am sure many people like the 19. Anyways, objectively, the performance difference between the Pegase and the 19 is the same as between the Discus and the Pegase. The handling of the Pegase is "modern", same type as the LS4, etc. and quite different from the handling of old style gliders. This is perhaps the reason why someone characterized it as a truck ... Personnally i like its stability, and it climbs very well. Also the air brakes are very effective. Of course for an american pilot, it is probably not a good choice due to the 3000 hours limit. I think it is a shame that Centrair has handled this issue in such a deplorable way. -- Michel TALON |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In what way do the "modern" glass ships differ from the older ones in
the handling department? Why would that account for someones opinion that the Peg handled like a truck? I would think that a modern ship would handle better than an older one, not worse. My only time in a glass single place is in my ASW 15 and I think the handing is fine. Of course, my comparison gliders are two seaters (L13, 2-33, Grob) . Not exactly nimble ships. Just how different is an LS4/Peg etc. from my 15? Roll rate? Lighter controls? Is it a case of not missing what I've never had? On the control connection issue, the ASW 15 is not automatic and getting those safety pins in was a real pain. I put the safety sleeves on and now its a non-issue. I check the connections at least 3-4 times and ALWAYS do a PCC. Manual hook ups is not a reason for me to cross a ship my list of potential new (to me) gliders. Mike ASW 15 but in the market |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pegasus fo sale ? | Jean | Soaring | 1 | February 21st 07 03:44 AM |
Pegasus time limit | [email protected] | Soaring | 38 | February 14th 07 08:35 AM |
Pegasus instrument panel | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 1st 06 11:42 PM |
FS: Pegasus | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | October 4th 05 10:05 PM |
Pegasus AD | [email protected] | Soaring | 9 | August 29th 05 12:03 AM |