RIP Cirrus

wrote in
:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?


Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.


Bertie

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :





On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
om:





On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...


Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2


Perhaps they were..



Bertie

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, but Churchhill spurned their advances... he threw away the
flowers, returned their cards and letters, and told them they were so
ugly, that he wouldn't go out with them if they were the last country
on earth!

wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:4dbc65f9-9720-426d-a166-

om:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from
accessing the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly
we have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the
above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping
in to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy.
But I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear
weapons pointed at my home or tries to steal our military
technology is my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the
Chinese with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise
their military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an
effort to expand their territory and gain access to more natural
resources. How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally
assumed you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, but Churchhill spurned their advances...

Fine example of humanity that he himself was.

he threw away the
flowers, returned their cards and letters, and told them they were so
ugly, that he wouldn't go out with them if they were the last country
on earth!


Surprising, since they're so closely related and share so many
interests.


Bertie

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If they can't buy it, I expect they will invade it... they have
already started a human wave of emigration.
http://www.slate.com/id/2086157/
http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/...t_destiny.html

wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:4dbc65f9-9720-426d-a166-

om:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from
accessing the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly
we have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the
above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping
in to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy.
But I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear
weapons pointed at my home or tries to steal our military
technology is my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the
Chinese with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise
their military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an
effort to expand their territory and gain access to more natural
resources. How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally
assumed you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If they can't buy it, I expect they will invade it...

Afrai of lusing your monopoly?

they have
already started a human wave of emigration.

Yes, the yellow peril is upon us.


Whatever will we do?





Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in
:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."
F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.
Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?
It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.
Thank you for demonstrating my point.
You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?


Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

I'm guessing he had an old B-52s tune playing in his head...

"tin roof...rusted!"

Rich Ahrens wrote in news:47509bf9$0$27488$804603d3
@auth.newsreader.iphouse.com:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in
news:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."
F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.
Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?
It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.
Thank you for demonstrating my point.
You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?


Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

I'm guessing he had an old B-52s tune playing in his head...

"tin roof...rusted!"

I'm pre-B52s. More sort of B-36



Bertie