![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . For a few. The rest--the people who made Cessna what it was by Actually Making the Cessnas--will have a hard time enjoying Cessna's "profits." So don't buy one. Easy, see? In what way is Americans not buying things good for the US economy? It would be better all around if I bought a Cessna that was built in Wichita instead of not buying one that was made in China. Meanwhile, they're reporting record profits for domestic production...not during production in China, but during the last two years. With a crisis like that it's no wonder they're moving to a communist state with shoddy quality control, unethical business practices, massive human rights violations and near-slave labor. Once those folks in Kansas are laid off, none of them will be buying Cessnas either. Not exactly Mr. Ford's business model. And you know the Chinese workers going to buy them either. 'Course, the French might, what with the value of the Euro over the dollar. It'll be interesting to hear from them about how the Skycatcher handles, because I'll probably never fly one. -c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gatt" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . For a few. The rest--the people who made Cessna what it was by Actually Making the Cessnas--will have a hard time enjoying Cessna's "profits." So don't buy one. Easy, see? In what way is Americans not buying things good for the US economy? It would be better all around if I bought a Cessna that was built in Wichita instead of not buying one that was made in China. Good grief. So, you want a law to make them build it in the US, is that it? Meanwhile, they're reporting record profits for domestic production...not during production in China, but during the last two years. With a crisis like that it's no wonder they're moving to a communist state with shoddy quality control, unethical business practices, massive human rights violations and near-slave labor. Like the US meat packing industry, ya mean? Once those folks in Kansas are laid off, none of them will be buying Cessnas either. Not exactly Mr. Ford's business model. And you know the Chinese workers going to buy them either. 'Course, the French might, what with the value of the Euro over the dollar. It'll be interesting to hear from them about how the Skycatcher handles, because I'll probably never fly one. There ya go. Don't buy one. You got there in the end. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . So, you want a law to make them build it in the US, is that it? Who said anything about a law? I said no more about making a new law than I said about making an Eleventh Commandment. Which is to say, nothing. There ya go. Don't buy one. You got there in the end. People not buying products is great for business. Meanwhile, quite a few people here in Portland lost their job because Freightliner just moved their shop to Mexico. Now even those aren't made here anymore. If we simply sell out our entire industrial capacity we can be agrarian and incapable of our own industry, just like the Confederate south. And, just like the ol' South, there will be a handful of very rich people and a whole lot of peasants. But who said anything about making a law? -c |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gatt" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . So, you want a law to make them build it in the US, is that it? Who said anything about a law? I did, UIt's in the sentence just above. I said no more about making a new law than I said about making an Eleventh Commandment. Which is to say, nothing. Didn;t say you did. There ya go. Don't buy one. You got there in the end. People not buying products is great for business. Meanwhile, quite a few people here in Portland lost their job because Freightliner just moved their shop to Mexico. Now even those aren't made here anymore. If we simply sell out our entire industrial capacity we can be agrarian and incapable of our own industry, just like the Confederate south. And, just like the ol' South, there will be a handful of very rich people and a whole lot of peasants. But who said anything about making a law? Well, make up your mind. If you blieve that this sort of trade is bad for the economy, either you regulate the import of foreign manufactured goods or you stop buying them. Either way, whining about it is pointless. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gatt" wrote in message ... "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . So, you want a law to make them build it in the US, is that it? Who said anything about a law? I said no more about making a new law than I said about making an Eleventh Commandment. Which is to say, nothing. There ya go. Don't buy one. You got there in the end. People not buying products is great for business. It sure teaches them a lesson. Meanwhile, quite a few people here in Portland lost their job because Freightliner just moved their shop to Mexico. SO, a highly competitive industry had ot go somewhere that high school dropout didn't get, what, $35 (a guess) an hour? Now even those aren't made here anymore. If we simply sell out our entire industrial capacity we can be agrarian and incapable of our own industry, just like the Confederate south. And, just like the ol' South, there will be a handful of very rich people and a whole lot of peasants. But who said anything about making a law? Envy is so unbecoming. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gatt" wrote in message ... "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . For a few. The rest--the people who made Cessna what it was by Actually Making the Cessnas--will have a hard time enjoying Cessna's "profits." So don't buy one. Easy, see? In what way is Americans not buying things good for the US economy? It would be better all around if I bought a Cessna that was built in Wichita instead of not buying one that was made in China. Except if it was built in Wichita, it would cost $200K and wouldn't sell at that price. Those workers would then have to be laid off. One might say American workers have priced themselves out of the market. BTW, how much of the actual work will go on offshore? Is everything made there, even the avionics? HINT!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt W. Barrow wrote:
Except if it was built in Wichita, it would cost $200K and wouldn't sell at that price. Those workers would then have to be laid off. One might say American workers have priced themselves out of the market. One might say that. One might also say that Cessna failed to design an aircraft that could be built in the US for $100k. Others have done it. If the name Skycatcher didn't have the name Cessna in front of it it would be considered an over-weight, late comer to the market. And would probably never see the sky. Now we find out that it isn't, in fact, a Cessna because Cessna is outsoucing it. I was never going to buy a Skycatcher. I liked it because it brought a certain ligitimacy to the LSA market that I hoped would bring some of the oldline FBOs and instructors around to what I think is the last chance for recreational flying. Now those same old guys are going to be able to say, "That's not really a Cessna. It's built in China." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Matt W. Barrow wrote: Except if it was built in Wichita, it would cost $200K and wouldn't sell at that price. Those workers would then have to be laid off. One might say American workers have priced themselves out of the market. One might say that. One might also say that Cessna failed to design an aircraft that could be built in the US for $100k. Others have done it. Others don't have Cessna's overhead or tax structures. Niether do they have the capacity/scale. I suspect their workforces are "different", as well. If the name Skycatcher didn't have the name Cessna in front of it it would be considered an over-weight, late comer to the market. And would probably never see the sky. It would for the same reasons Honda and Toyota and Datsun had a bit of a hard time breaking into the US auto market. Now we find out that it isn't, in fact, a Cessna because Cessna is outsoucing it. I was never going to buy a Skycatcher. I liked it because it brought a certain ligitimacy to the LSA market that I hoped would bring some of the oldline FBOs and instructors around to what I think is the last chance for recreational flying. Now those same old guys are going to be able to say, "That's not really a Cessna. It's built in China." And rightfully so. If Cessna decided to shift Columbia production to China I'd never buy another one. I was going to buy a couple Dell computers to replace a couple here that are getting long in the tooth, but decided on another brand made in the US. I'll buy from Taiwan, Mexico, even Indonesia...but not from China unless it's bandages and I'm bleeding to death. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One might say American workers have priced themselves out of the
market. One might say that. One might also say that Cessna failed to design an aircraft that could be built in the US for $100k. Others have done it. You'd think one of/if not the largest single-engine producer in the world would be able to do such a thing. On the other hand, I'm sure the executives in the telecom industry and at Citibank knew what they were doing, too. -c |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt W. Barrow" wrote in message ... One might say American workers have priced themselves out of the market. BTW, how much of the actual work will go on offshore? Is everything made there, even the avionics? HINT!! We'll have to agree to disagree, Matt. Ford knew that the way to succeed was to make ownership of his product achievable even by his employees. Cessna's solution is to offload domestic employees completely. If they're like the old Gibson employees, they'll get together and start making a better product. (See "Heritage Guitars.") At least if the SkyCatcher starts falling apart in midair because of poor quality control, Cessna can blame China. I suspect as much of the actual work will go on offshore as they can get away with. And if it fails, they'll award themselves multi-million-dollar severance bonuses a la Carly the Destroyer at HP, and say "Well, ya takes your chances" and leave the wreckage of the Cessna company to be picked up by Daimler or the Saudis or something. -c |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this yet another Cirrus | Gig 601XL Builder | Piloting | 11 | January 27th 06 05:34 AM |
Another Cirrus Down | DA40 Owner | Piloting | 14 | January 12th 06 05:45 PM |
Another Cirrus Down | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 16 | January 7th 06 12:33 AM |
Another Cirrus Down | Roger | Piloting | 0 | December 15th 05 09:16 AM |
Another Cirrus Down | cjcampbell | Piloting | 0 | December 13th 05 05:50 AM |