RIP Cirrus

wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
om:





On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...


Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2


Perhaps they were..



Bertie

Gatt wrote:
But first they should tell it to the
Americans who just lost their jobs to the communists so that handful of
investors could make more money.


No employee at Cessna lost their job because they're building the 162 in
China. Cessna is hiring.

On Nov 28, 11:07 am, Newps wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote:
Geez, Cessna buys Columbia and the king of copy and paste hasn't posted
something of actual interest here yet?

You think that will really kill Cirrus?

No, just getting your attention. But Cirrus will find themselves a
distant second within a couple years. You just can't beat an
established company with a great dealer network when your products are
similar.

I think the Cirrus SR22 competes well against the Columbia...er...
Cessna 350. The SR20 and Cessna 400 are on oposite ends of the
market, so they don't really compete head to head.

Where Cirrus has the advantage right now is in availability of
maintenance, training and insurance. It will take Cessna a while to
catch up. In the meantime, Cirrus will continue to sell aircraft at
an amazing pace.

Gatt wrote:

Wal-Mart's domestic factories were going flat out when they bragged to
everybody about how American they were.


One thing here. Wal-Mart isn't a manufacture.

Newps wrote:
Gatt wrote:
But first they should tell it to the
Americans who just lost their jobs to the communists so that handful
of investors could make more money.


No employee at Cessna lost their job because they're building the 162
in China. Cessna is hiring.

Though I didn't make the original statment I'll rephrase form him.

....American's that won't get jobs that the communists will so that handful
of investors could make more money.

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, but Churchhill spurned their advances... he threw away the
flowers, returned their cards and letters, and told them they were so
ugly, that he wouldn't go out with them if they were the last country
on earth!

"Newps" wrote:

As an owner I could not possibly care less that my manufacturer goes out
and does demos. I want availability of service and I want parts in stock.
I also want shops that don't have to phone the home office just to get the
cowl off.

After I bought the 182 in June, my first warranty contact with my nearest
Cessna Service Center produced this remark:

"We used to be a Piper dealer. We don't know much about Cessnas."

They didn't have any parts, either.



OTOH, the Cessna factory people I've talked to have been very helpful and
have responded promptly to requests.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If they can't buy it, I expect they will invade it... they have
already started a human wave of emigration.
http://www.slate.com/id/2086157/
http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/...t_destiny.html

wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:4dbc65f9-9720-426d-a166-

om:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from
accessing the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly
we have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the
above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping
in to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy.
But I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear
weapons pointed at my home or tries to steal our military
technology is my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the
Chinese with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise
their military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an
effort to expand their territory and gain access to more natural
resources. How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally
assumed you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, but Churchhill spurned their advances...

Fine example of humanity that he himself was.

he threw away the
flowers, returned their cards and letters, and told them they were so
ugly, that he wouldn't go out with them if they were the last country
on earth!


Surprising, since they're so closely related and share so many
interests.


Bertie

wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 11:43 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:4dbc65f9-9720-426d-a166-

om:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385

@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c





om:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from
accessing the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly
we have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the
above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping
in to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy.
But I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear
weapons pointed at my home or tries to steal our military
technology is my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the
Chinese with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise
their military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an
effort to expand their territory and gain access to more natural
resources. How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...

Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally
assumed you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2

Perhaps they were..

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If they can't buy it, I expect they will invade it...

Afrai of lusing your monopoly?

they have
already started a human wave of emigration.

Yes, the yellow peril is upon us.


Whatever will we do?





Bertie