Gene Whitt's Lawsuit

That does not meet the Federal standard and is not enforceable. It is too
restrictive with words added to allow the county to require permits and fees
to operate at the federally funded airport.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFII-ASMELI, A&P
BE400/BE1900-BE300
"BT" wrote in message
...
| We fought the same battle when the local County Dept of Aviation was
trying
| to ban "freelance CFIs".. after a few meetings with legal.. this is what
| they came up with.
| BT
| FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS
|
| A person holding a current FAA flight instructor's certificate, who gives
| occasional flight instruction and does not advertise or proactively make
| available flight instruction and does not advertise or proactively make
| available flight instruction to an Aircraft Owner in the Aircraft Owner's
| aircraft, shall not be deemed a commercial operator. Additionally in
| accordance with County Code as may be amended, the permit requirements of
| this section do not apply to the incidental conduct of certain business or
| commercial transactions on an irregular and infrequent basis occurring
| between persons who are not based at or who are not otherwise operating
any
| commercial activity from the Airport
|
|
|
| wrote in message
| news | Anyone have a link to or a copy of the lawsuit Gene Whitt filed
| against the airport that stopped freelance CFI's from operating from
| there. My local airport is attempting the same thing and I'm
| gathering information for the freelance CFI's I know..
|
|

On Dec 2, 9:51 pm, "Jim Macklin"
wrote:
That does not meet the Federal standard and is not enforceable. It is too
restrictive with words added to allow the county to require permits and fees
to operate at the federally funded airport.

Yes, but: How do you get the FAA to enforce their regs?


denny