Yet Another Cirrus SR22 Crash.

Mxsmanic,

That's a rather incriminating statement to make.


It may be a matter of my being a non-native speaker, but I can't follow
(not that I normally can).

I'm a journalist. If there was no copyright, I would have no income. If
everybody was infringing on my copyright, I would have no income. Thus,
I have something against copyright infringements in the casual manner
recommended here.


--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Darkwing" wrote:

From what I have read the ballistic chute has never gone off due to a
crash, they were always pulled by an occupant.

Don't know where you read that, but it happenened in this crash and has
happened before.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM

Dan Luke wrote:

Don't know where you read that, but it happenened in this crash and has
happened before.


The NTSB believes it can happen:

http://www.ntsb.gov/Recs/letters/2004/A04_36_41.pdf

Dan Luke schrieb:

From what I have read the ballistic chute has never gone off due to a
crash, they were always pulled by an occupant.

Don't know where you read that, but it happenened in this crash and has
happened before.

And where did you read *that*?

Thomas Borchert wrote:


It may be a matter of my being a non-native speaker, but I can't follow
(not that I normally can).

Your sentence can be taken two ways. The village idiot took it the
wrong way.

On Nov 30, 3:08 pm, "Neil Gould" wrote:

Gusting at up to 20 kts? That shouldn't have been much of a problem.

Another unfortunate loss, and it saddens me that the kids were victims in
this accident.

Neil

Neil, the loss was indeed unfortunate and very sad. The wind that day
was gusting from many directions and other very experienced pilots
were having difficulty landing. I have stated before that the SR22 (at
least the one that I flew) was one of the most difficult planes I have
had to land; speed control is critical in that plane. I have bounced
landings in the SR22 more than once. I was to also fly that day and
cancelled because the gusts made landing very difficult. I could
easily see how one of the gusts lifted a wing tip while trying to land
and causing the plane to flip. I am not saying that is what happened,
but I certainly can see that possibility on that day. I tried to
locate the actual Metars for that airport and other airports in the
Twin Cities for that date, but was unsuccessful.

Cary Mariash

"Newps" wrote in message
...


Thomas Borchert wrote:


It may be a matter of my being a non-native speaker, but I can't follow
(not that I normally can).

Your sentence can be taken two ways. The village idiot took it the
wrong way.

And replied in the most ambiguous way possible

Thomas Borchert writes:

I'm a journalist. If there was no copyright, I would have no income. If
everybody was infringing on my copyright, I would have no income. Thus,
I have something against copyright infringements in the casual manner
recommended here.

Actually, the ephemeral and time-sensitive nature of journalism makes it
possible to earn money with it even in the absence of copyright. In many
cases, by the time someone infringes, it's old news.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Thomas Borchert writes:

I'm a journalist. If there was no copyright, I would have no income. If
everybody was infringing on my copyright, I would have no income. Thus,
I have something against copyright infringements in the casual manner
recommended here.

Actually, the ephemeral and time-sensitive nature of journalism makes it
possible to earn money with it even in the absence of copyright. In many
cases, by the time someone infringes, it's old news.



Like you.


Bertie

Dan,

but it happenened in this crash


Accident analysis by acclamation?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)