![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#281
|
|||
|
|||
![]() But all it will take is one spill to do great harm. A spill is possible for any person that walks out with coffee that hot. And it takes only one drink to impair someone's judgment and motor skills enough to have a serious accident and kill someone. The big point is that the seller of the coffee has in his power the ability to make a safer product, and does not take the opportunity. There is some responsibility because of that fact. As does the seller of alcoholic drinks. Think O-Douls. There is no need to sell unsafe drinks that contain alcohol. I have no idea why you have such a hard on about this subject, and for my points, but your arguments have descended into the illogical and absurd. You will have to play with yourself, from here on out. I'm done with you, on this one. -- Jim in NC |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:54:07 -0800, C J Campbell
wrote: On 2007-12-02 15:37:16 -0800, Peter Clark said: On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:30:37 -0500, "Blueskies" wrote: "F. Baum" wrote in message ... On Dec 2, 11:32 am, wrote: There's been an AD against the Caravan for more than a year (2006-06-06) that was recently superseded by 2007-10-15, perhaps driven by this accident. It seems that it doesn't matter that ADs are issued; they have to be modified or amended or superseded to make people sit up and take problems seriously. The Caravan has long had a history of poor ice performance and anyone flying one and staying current with aviation should know that. Dan, thanks for posting something aviation related on this thread (As opposed to Jay's OT BS). It has been a long time since I have flown a Caravan so I am not going to try to be an expert here. Unfortunatly the Caravan isnt the only Turboprop with poor icing performance (Remember the ATR). There are several others that I have flown that are downright scary in icing conditions. Maybe it is an inherent problem in Turboprpops. Thanks for the link. F Baum The airplane is NOT approved for flight into *known* icing conditions. So when a pilot finds himself in those conditions in one of these planes, Cessna is to blame if he/she screws up and crashes... The Cessna Model 208 and 208B Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)Supplement S1 "Known Icing Euipment" begs to differ. I will have to check my copy of it if and when I ever manage to get back to the office. That is, after we get the flood water out of the house and the roads are clear. :-) Yea, looks like the whole Northwest is a mess. I could have sworn that it was not certified for known ice. Yours might not be properly equipped for known icing (it aparantly is a factory/aftermarket option), but the type is. There are references to FIKI in the TCDS. |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
But all it will take is one spill to do great harm. A spill is possible for any person that walks out with coffee that hot. And it takes only one drink to impair someone's judgment and motor skills enough to have a serious accident and kill someone. The big point is that the seller of the coffee has in his power the ability to make a safer product, and does not take the opportunity. There is some responsibility because of that fact. As does the seller of alcoholic drinks. Think O-Douls. There is no need to sell unsafe drinks that contain alcohol. I have no idea why you have such a hard on about this subject, and for my points, but your arguments have descended into the illogical and absurd. It was hard to keep up with you in regard to lack of logic, especially given my education and experience, but I was trying! :-) Matt |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote in
news ![]() Morgans wrote: But all it will take is one spill to do great harm. A spill is possible for any person that walks out with coffee that hot. And it takes only one drink to impair someone's judgment and motor skills enough to have a serious accident and kill someone. The big point is that the seller of the coffee has in his power the ability to make a safer product, and does not take the opportunity. There is some responsibility because of that fact. As does the seller of alcoholic drinks. Think O-Douls. There is no need to sell unsafe drinks that contain alcohol. I have no idea why you have such a hard on about this subject, and for my points, but your arguments have descended into the illogical and absurd. It was hard to keep up with you in regard to lack of logic, especially given my education and experience, but I was trying! :-) Matt You're always trying. Bertie |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"B A R R Y" wrote in message ... On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:30:56 -0500, Margy Natalie wrote: It's not the schools its the parents. Umm...the parents that came though public schools? I've seen parents come in to find out why the TEACHER made a mistake and Johnny got a B. My wife's a dedicated teacher. I hear it every day. 8^( And the teachers that have been telling parents, for years now, to "Shut up...we're the experts" hasan't had an effect? I remember when they gave teachers the same tests they were giving their students, the teachers failed...miserablly. I have, though, been to my kids school to ask the teacher why a science question was a single sentence 115 worlds long, and why a friend of our, with an MS degree from Princeton, could not figure out the problem. That's just ONE instance. Those are good parent questions, and they should be asked. The ones that are not good are the ones that question poor grades even if the kid didn't come to school, didn't do the make up work, didn't do homework and flunked the test. Then the teacher gets in trouble because the kid failed. Dedication is nice, but that's about all - it will not give students even an ounce of knowledge or ability to comprehend the world. |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:28:03 GMT, kontiki The reason there is a "slant" to a public education is that the vast majority of teachers graduate from public schools, then go to a college or university then go right into teaching. That is inbreeding... pretty much the same way with politicians... most have never had an actual real job in their life. My wife didn't do it that way. She worked for a Fortune 50 corporation, then ran the office for her parent's 180+ employee asbestos and lead abatement company, then decided to teach elementary school. She took her first teaching job @ 37. Her elementary school coworkers include a couple who worked for an oil company in Saudi Arabia for 20 years (first taught in their 50's), an ex advertising sales executive (42, as a first year teacher), and a former Comair pilot. Yeah, in our local school system a number of our teachers are retired military. It's affordable to be a teacher if you are pulling a pension :-). Margy |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"B A R R Y" wrote in message ... On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 23:58:46 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: And your point? Bad parents have unteachable kids. The criminals I mentioned... I know a kid whose dad spent years in the state pen and was later killed by a SWAT team. He graduated third in his class of over 400. Parents who care, and are involved, have successful kids. The successful immigrants... I'll bet the same thing would have happened to you that would have happened to me if we brought home an "F". Today, it's not like that. Many times an "F" is deserved. As many times the teacher would have also gotten an "F". When they gave math teachers the same math tests, the average grade was 60%, with 70% being a failing grade. It's nearly the rule, rather than the exception. Given the absolute irrationality and indoctrination coming from schools, would more attentive parents make that much of a dent? Would it make the psychosis coming from schools go away? No matter how attentive parents are, "whole word reading", for example, isn't going to make kids good readers. Would it make schools less likely to spread Global Warming bull****? Ah, you have reached the real issue. Fad teaching to meet demands of "make these kids do xyz, better, faster, earlier, etc." Whole word reading is valid, as is phonics, as is whole language. Of course the problem is many people (parents, politicians, etc.) won't believe there isn't a "good way" to teach reading. Not all kids can learn to read using whole word, but some kids can only learn using whole word, same with phonics, same with whole language. But, IMHO as long as they learn to read well enough to pass the written for the private ticket, I don't care how they did it. Margy |
#288
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxwell wrote:
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "Matt W. Barrow" wrote Then grab your butt. (I'll not wait for more of Morgan's adolesant alibis.) You should really learn how to post, because most of what your post attributed to Jay were my words. You don't have to worry about me responding to you on the subject of education. Your views are not worth my consideration, as they are so biased, and worthless. You should really consider going back to school at your private school, so you could learn to spell adolescent, too. -- Jim in NC I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt! Thanks, I needed that. I once had a student (special ed) who could not read (sound out words) at all. We'd gone through all sorts of methods with him, but the weird thing was I had him 'read' a story, out loud and he managed to sound out about 20% of the words, but when a student who was out of the room came in and I asked him to fill her in on what she had missed he recited the entire section with 95% word for word accuracy. He couldn't read, but he was smart. |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#290
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-12-06 15:27:04 -0800, Peter Clark
said: The Cessna Model 208 and 208B Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)Supplement S1 "Known Icing Euipment" begs to differ. I will have to check my copy of it if and when I ever manage to get back to the office. That is, after we get the flood water out of the house and the roads are clear. :-) Yea, looks like the whole Northwest is a mess. Well, we at least have one lane open into town, now. Great. I need garden hose, wading boots, another floor squeegee, and my pressure washer repaired. I also need a new pair of pants. We also need to talk to some carpet people, I suppose. The cedar paneling in my office is shot, too. And -- I still have Christmas shopping to do. Probably do that online. We also have a contractor coming tomorrow with his Bobcat to clear the remaining silt off the driveway and start excavating the lawn. I could have sworn that it was not certified for known ice. Yours might not be properly equipped for known icing (it aparantly is a factory/aftermarket option), but the type is. There are references to FIKI in the TCDS. I wish I actually had a Caravan. I was seriously considering one a few years ago. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
British Aircraft to be used for Skydiving in Iran! | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 0 | September 7th 07 06:40 PM |
British Aircraft to be used for Skydiving in Iran! | [email protected] | Simulators | 0 | September 7th 07 06:39 PM |
Lycoming Sued | jls | Home Built | 0 | February 13th 04 02:01 PM |
Glider/Skydiving Crash | dm | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 03 05:13 PM |
WOW - Shots fired at skydiving plane in NY... | Buff5200 | Piloting | 15 | July 14th 03 06:37 PM |