![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It probably works better in rough western conditions. As you said, "pitch
strings" are very sub-optimum AOA indicators. I don't use them because it's such a hassle closing the canopy without trapping the strings between the canopy frame and fuselage. I think it's likely that the SafeFlight vane-type AOA indicator works fine as long as you are fairly good at keeping the yaw string centered. SafeFlight has been around selling these things to airplane owners for a long time. It's nice to see them offering a product for gliders. Bill Daniels "jcarlyle" wrote in message ... I've got pitch strings on both sides of the canopy of my ASW-19, Bill, but I've not seen this behavior. I'll make an effort to look carefully the next time thermals appear in Pennsylvania! As was said earlier in the thread, though, strings on the canopy are greatly affected by yaw. They might help indicate lift, but they won't really be useful AOA indicators. And if AOA instruments average out rough air fluctuations, they won't be too useful as incipient lift indicators. Tough problem! -John Bill Daniels wrote: Many pilots who have tried the "pitch strings" report that they give advance warning when entering an area of lift. When you enter the edge of a thermal, the strings show a sharp increase in AOA several seconds before the vario shows lift. This improves the efficiency of "dolphin flying" by providing an earlier signal of when to start a zoom. One pilot on a marginal final glide told me, "Without them, I wouldn't have made it home." An ASI gives the same signal but it's weaker and harder to interpret. Most AOA sensors have some damping to smooth the signal in rough air. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was Googling around, and ran across yet another AOA device. Check
out this site: http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm and pay particular attention to the 3rd photograph. Yaw string and AOA in one, and not very expensive! -John On Dec 9, 6:46 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I think it's likely that the SafeFlight vane-type AOA indicator works fine as long as you are fairly good at keeping the yaw string centered. SafeFlight has been around selling these things to airplane owners for a long time. It's nice to see them offering a product for gliders. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that probably works on an ultralight without an aerodynamic nose
cone. Laminar airflow around a nose cone will be nearly parallel to the skin at any AOA of interest. That's why the AOA sensor has to be on the sides of the fuselage. Bill Daniels "jcarlyle" wrote in message ... I was Googling around, and ran across yet another AOA device. Check out this site: http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm and pay particular attention to the 3rd photograph. Yaw string and AOA in one, and not very expensive! -John On Dec 9, 6:46 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I think it's likely that the SafeFlight vane-type AOA indicator works fine as long as you are fairly good at keeping the yaw string centered. SafeFlight has been around selling these things to airplane owners for a long time. It's nice to see them offering a product for gliders. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 9, 10:09 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
I think that probably works on an ultralight without an aerodynamic nose cone. Laminar airflow around a nose cone will be nearly parallel to the skin at any AOA of interest. That's why the AOA sensor has to be on the sides of the fuselage. Bill Daniels Good point. They can also be located on a boom extending away from the fuselage or wing - as usually seen on prototypes, where accurate, "true" AOA is needed. Often combined with a yaw sensor (just a fancy yaw string, really) to measure true sideslip. I wonder if an AOA vane could be mounted on a modified tail TE/combi probe? The probe would have to be a lot stiffer to work (at least that's what she said...). Kirk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Out of curiosity I made a test. I built a cuff with an 21/2 ft arrow
shaft attached, line up with the wing chord. I had several strings attached on top of each other about half inch apart and different length. Very interesting to see how the air responds well ahead of the leading edge but useless for any useable information. With flaps, the changes I was interested in were to small in any case. Udo On Dec 9, 10:04 pm, jcarlyle wrote: I was Googling around, and ran across yet another AOA device. Check out this site:http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm and pay particular attention to the 3rd photograph. Yaw string and AOA in one, and not very expensive! -John On Dec 9, 6:46 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I think it's likely that the SafeFlight vane-type AOA indicator works fine as long as you are fairly good at keeping the yaw string centered. SafeFlight has been around selling these things to airplane owners for a long time. It's nice to see them offering a product for gliders.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good to hear about an actual experiment, thanks.
Why do you say it was interesting but useless? Did it not give you AoA information? Interesting you say changes with flaps were too small.. to see? I wonder if a piano wire probe like http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm but on the nose would work. How far out on the wing was your cuff? Sarah Udo wrote: Out of curiosity I made a test. I built a cuff with an 21/2 ft arrow shaft attached, line up with the wing chord. I had several strings attached on top of each other about half inch apart and different length. Very interesting to see how the air responds well ahead of the leading edge but useless for any useable information. With flaps, the changes I was interested in were to small in any case. Udo On Dec 9, 10:04 pm, jcarlyle wrote: I was Googling around, and ran across yet another AOA device. Check out this site:http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm and pay particular attention to the 3rd photograph. Yaw string and AOA in one, and not very expensive! -John On Dec 9, 6:46 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I think it's likely that the SafeFlight vane-type AOA indicator works fine as long as you are fairly good at keeping the yaw string centered. SafeFlight has been around selling these things to airplane owners for a long time. It's nice to see them offering a product for gliders.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The probe was about 3 ft from the cockpit wall.
You would need something a lot more precise to be of use for flying efficiently day to day I could see a resolution of a 1/2 degree or better. with adjustable dampening. I was trying to see if the theoretical match the real thing. To optimize performance you should have something to compare it with and record it. That is why the annual Idaflieg is such a big deal in Germany it takes a lot of effort and equipment. I found that the theoretical for me was close enough and all I needed was time to fine tune my settings and speed vis a vis other gliders. When the big day came I gave R.Johnson the speed and flap setting I thought best and it work out not bad. Udo On Dec 10, 10:10 am, Sarah Anderson wrote: Good to hear about an actual experiment, thanks. Why do you say it was interesting but useless? Did it not give you AoA information? Interesting you say changes with flaps were too small.. to see? I wonder if a piano wire probe like http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm but on the nose would work. How far out on the wing was your cuff? Sarah Udo wrote: Out of curiosity I made a test. I built a cuff with an 21/2 ft arrow shaft attached, line up with the wing chord. I had several strings attached on top of each other about half inch apart and different length. Very interesting to see how the air responds well ahead of the leading edge but useless for any useable information. With flaps, the changes I was interested in were to small in any case. Udo On Dec 9, 10:04 pm, jcarlyle wrote: I was Googling around, and ran across yet another AOA device. Check out this site:http://www.adventureairsports.com/aoa.htm and pay particular attention to the 3rd photograph. Yaw string and AOA in one, and not very expensive! -John On Dec 9, 6:46 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I think it's likely that the SafeFlight vane-type AOA indicator works fine as long as you are fairly good at keeping the yaw string centered. SafeFlight has been around selling these things to airplane owners for a long time. It's nice to see them offering a product for gliders.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stalls - Angle of Attack versus Vstall | [email protected] | Piloting | 44 | October 6th 06 01:26 AM |
preferrred bank angle indicator? | Matt Herron Jr. | Soaring | 34 | July 10th 06 02:22 PM |
Need glider airspeed indicator | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 05 09:57 PM |
Glider vs. Power Pattern Bank Angle? | Jim Vincent | Soaring | 28 | June 15th 04 03:41 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |