![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: What is the practical difference between "above, but not including" (e.g., +12) and "above and including" (e.g., 12)? I think it serves when you have two airspaces with no margin between them. For exampple, one is 12/SFC, the other is 70/12+. So at 1200 feet you're in one airspace, and at 1201 feet, you're in the other. If they were specified as 11/SFC and 70/12, the space between 1101 feet and 1199 feet inclusive would be outside either airspace. Wrong. Study the TERPS. Again, Anthony, you're a simulator freak, not a pilot of any kind. Your posting of incorrect and misleading answers is a waste of everyone's time. What you "think" is irrelevant. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rip writes:
Wrong. Study the TERPS. Again, Anthony, you're a simulator freak, not a pilot of any kind. Your posting of incorrect and misleading answers is a waste of everyone's time. What you "think" is irrelevant. If I'm incorrect, why don't you provide the correct answer? You waste everyone's time by saying I'm wrong without saying what's right. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Rip writes: Wrong. Study the TERPS. Again, Anthony, you're a simulator freak, not a pilot of any kind. Your posting of incorrect and misleading answers is a waste of everyone's time. What you "think" is irrelevant. If I'm incorrect, why don't you provide the correct answer? You waste everyone's time by saying I'm wrong without saying what's right. Because you don't fly. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-12-17, Rip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote: writes: What is the practical difference between "above, but not including" (e.g., +12) and "above and including" (e.g., 12)? I think it serves when you have two airspaces with no margin between them. For exampple, one is 12/SFC, the other is 70/12+. So at 1200 feet you're in one airspace, and at 1201 feet, you're in the other. If they were specified as 11/SFC and 70/12, the space between 1101 feet and 1199 feet inclusive would be outside either airspace. Wrong. Study the TERPS. Again, Anthony, you're a simulator freak, not a pilot of any kind. Your posting of incorrect and misleading answers is a waste of everyone's time. What you "think" is irrelevant. It's easy to put trolls into the kill file. However I haven't found a good way to kill troll fodder like this in SLRN. Any suggestions? -- Doug Carter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airbus writes:
Trying to read between the lines of this incredibly weird post, it would appear the writer is suffering from the illusion that "fractional" airspace altitudes in a given segment are indicated both for the charted (Class B) airspace and for the underlying (Class E). Readers should be advised of the fact that this expert, offering his "presumptions" may never have seen a sectional chart, and certainly has never studied the subject - does not know how to read the chart. Okay ... so explain why the charts include + and - for altitude limits on airspaces? I already know the answer, since I looked it up ages ago, and I've given it, but I'll try again: If you see, say, 50/SFC for a Class C, and 80/50+ for a Class B above it, it means that the Class C extends from the surface to 5000 feet inclusive, and the Class B extends from 5001 feet to 8000 feet inclusive. Without a plus or minus sign, there is an ambiguous margin of 100 feet between the airspaces. For example 50/SFC for the Class C and 80/51 for the Class B means that the area between 5001 feet and 5099 feet inclusive is in neither airspace. Since this could cause problems if someone were to actually try to fly through this thin slice of air, calling it uncontrolled, the + and - are used to make it clear that the two airspaces touch each other, with no space between. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Airbus writes: Trying to read between the lines of this incredibly weird post, it would appear the writer is suffering from the illusion that "fractional" airspace altitudes in a given segment are indicated both for the charted (Class B) airspace and for the underlying (Class E). Readers should be advised of the fact that this expert, offering his "presumptions" may never have seen a sectional chart, and certainly has never studied the subject - does not know how to read the chart. Okay ... so explain why the charts include + and - for altitude limits on airspaces? Doesn't matter, you don't use airspace. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Windows into the Class A airspace | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | August 11th 07 10:32 AM |
Class F Airspace in Germany | Guy Corbett | Soaring | 4 | May 9th 07 09:25 AM |
Class A airspace | flying_monkey | Soaring | 66 | October 22nd 06 03:38 PM |
Meigs Class D Airspace | Defly | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 19th 04 02:53 PM |
vfr corridors through class B airspace | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | November 2nd 03 11:28 PM |