![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I purchased Fat Albert from an FBO who kept him in an unheated hangar
for 40 years, and never preheated unless it was well below zero (that's in Farenheit, sonny)... Often it was a 3AM panic call from GM who needed engine parts delivered to avoid the assembly plant from shutting down and their truck was already on the way to the airport with the parts....Load the plane, start the engines, hurry down the taxiway checking mags while rolling, swing onto the runway, cob the throttles and go... Elapsed running time from start to takeoff, less than two minutes for the nearest runway, and perhaps three minutes for the furthest... HIs engines routinely went to TBO... While there is nothing wrong with preheat, etc. - there is also nothing wrong with using synthetic oil and preheating only for extreme temperatures... The biggest killer of aircraft engines is dry starts from weeks/months of sitting between starts... Low temperature starts on a well oiled engine have little to no impact on the wear cycle... I use 15W50 in the winter and 100W+ in the summer... I do not preheat unless it is below zero F... My starboard engine has 1700 hours since factory zero and other than the oil burn being ~ 3 hours to the quart, it starts and runs like a new engine... The port engine has 900 hours since a field overhaul and it runs fine... denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 20, 6:04 am, Denny wrote:
The biggest killer of aircraft engines is dry starts from weeks/months of sitting between starts... That's one, but there's another bad one: Short flights, especially in cold weather. byproducts of combustion include water vapor, and some of that squeezes past the pistons and rings when the engine is cold (some when it's hot, too, but much less so) and this vapor condenses in the crankcase and ends up in the oil. If the engine doesn't get hot enough for long enough, the water isn't boiled off and will mix slowly with the oil, breaking it down and combining with sulfur and chlorine and nitrogen to form sulfuric, hydrochloric and nitric acids. These don't belong in your engine. The stuff that's left from these reactions forms sludge and clogs up hydraulic lifters and cakes on the inside of the case and soon enough breaks off and shows up as scary black guck in the filter. The acids cause dissimilar metal corrosion between the crank and cam and their bearings, between the aluminum piston and the steel cylinder and rings, and on valve stems. Bad. Corroded valve stems break and the engine tries to eat the valve heads and gets indigestion. The oil in my little old Continental doesn't get above 120°F on cold days. There's a tank blanket that I need to buy or make to get it up. I just finished rebuilding the thing to fix corroded bearings and seized valve lifters. Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 4:45 am, Stealth Pilot
wrote: squeezing past the rings probably contributes a millionth of one poofteenth of a percent to the problem. when the crankcase cools there is moist external air sucked into the cavity of the case through the crankcase breather. the moisture condenses onto the cold internal surfaces of the engine. can you please factor that into the alchemy above? it probably does the damage occurring between the poofteenth of your scenario and the 100%. Nope. We have taken rocker covers off engines immediately after a runup of a brand-new engine and found copious amounts of water in them. The blowby of any cold engine is significant. If we briefly run up an engine that has sat all night in a heated hangar and in our very dry winter climate, we will find water on the dipstick every time, with the engine at any point in its life. And the dipstick was dry beforehand. We operate on the western Canadian prairies where the air is drier that where I grew up in south-central BC, which is the northern tip of the Sonora Desert. We get little rain and snow here. Temps reach -40C, more typically -20C, no fog and clear skies most of the winter. It's REALLY dry, and any air sucked into these engines after shutdown doesn't have enough moisture to make a couple of tears. Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather
combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the breather. Burning hydrocarbons generate CO2 and water. The net dew point of combustion and blowby products is about 180 degF. The water will condense in cooler sections of the crankcase. It is this water that causes most corrosion - especially after combining with nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides which make acid. Crankcase condensation happens from engine operation - not from just sitting around. The real trick is to ventilate these residual combustion products from the crankcase immediately after shutdown before they all condense. Systems are now starting to be sold which actively do this. A lot of this moisture accumulation problem would go away if aircraft engines had a positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system like car engines now do, but they don't for whatever reason. I suspect part of the reason car engines now last so much longer is due to the PCV system. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 1:39 pm, nrp wrote:
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the breather. Burning hydrocarbons generate CO2 and water. The net dew point of combustion and blowby products is about 180 degF. The water will condense in cooler sections of the crankcase. It is this water that causes most corrosion - especially after combining with nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides which make acid. Crankcase condensation happens from engine operation - not from just sitting around. The real trick is to ventilate these residual combustion products from the crankcase immediately after shutdown before they all condense. Systems are now starting to be sold which actively do this. A lot of this moisture accumulation problem would go away if aircraft engines had a positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system like car engines now do, but they don't for whatever reason. I suspect part of the reason car engines now last so much longer is due to the PCV system. Part of the problem is the water mixed with the oil; it's reluctant to evaporate when it's like that. Running the engine long enough to give it time to boil out is the best thing, and a PCV system would surely help. Proof of water as a combustion byproduct can be noted in colder climates. If the breather tube is not drilled with a relief hole partway up from its exit, it's liable to freeze up in cold weather as the moisture that's constantly leaving the tube freezes at the exit and plugs it. Then the pressure builds in the case and blows the front seal out, scaring the daylights out of the pilot as oil covers the windscreen. Some operators insulate that tube as well to keep the gases hot enough to keep that exit open. When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the breather tube the next morning. That water wasn't sucked into the engine as it cooled off. The engine's internal volume might be two or three cubic feet, and if the air in there contracts by even 30%, that little bit isn't going to pull in much moisture. It becomes a bigger problem in wet climates and repeated warming/cooling cycles, as an airplane sits outside for months on end and gets warm in the sun and cools off at night. The same phenomenon puts water in your fuel tanks. Dan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's probably no more than about 1 cu ft of volume in a typical
crankcase. Even so that will contain on the order of half to one shot glass full of water on shutdown. This will almost entirely condense out as the crankcase is cooled to room temperature. There is a slight amount of in-out-in of surrounding atmospheric humidity with temperature, but the amount of water contained in that air is trivial compared to that generated or left over by the products of combustion. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the breather tube the next morning. I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3 foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips down to cause the puddle. An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely after flight and see if anything accumulates. Good Luck, Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 2:39*pm, nrp wrote:
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the breather. * It seems to me that the air in the crancase is about 250 deg F typically, since the pistons and such are hotter than the oil. That means the partial pressure inside the crankcase decreases as the engine cools, and the pressure drops, according to the equation Pv=RT. As the pressure drops inside, the air outside has to enter the crankcase to equalize the pressure, correct? With the air temp as much as 200 deg higher inside the engine as outside, that means that a volume of about half the crankcase of outside air ENTERS the crankcase during the pressure equalization process. At least that is the way it seems to me. Bud |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"As the pressure drops inside, the air outside has to enter the
crankcase to equalize the pressure, correct? With the air temp as much as 200 deg higher inside the engine as outside, that means that a volume of about half the crankcase of outside air ENTERS the crankcase during the pressure equalization process. At least that is the way it seems to me." But it isn't air in the crankcase during engine operation. It is a mixture of CO2 and water vapor. Outside air will re-enter only when the water vapor condenses after shutdown. The amount of water vapor in the comparatively cool outside air being drawn in is one or two orders of magnitude less than that in the hot crankcase. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences between automotive & airplane engines | Chris Wells | Home Built | 105 | February 18th 06 11:00 PM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
LOM engines | buckey | Home Built | 14 | October 30th 03 05:22 PM |
automotive parts on airplane engines | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 15 | September 28th 03 02:55 AM |
Barnyard--- Auto engines | Jerry Springer | Home Built | 10 | August 8th 03 06:38 PM |