![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather
combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the breather. Burning hydrocarbons generate CO2 and water. The net dew point of combustion and blowby products is about 180 degF. The water will condense in cooler sections of the crankcase. It is this water that causes most corrosion - especially after combining with nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides which make acid. Crankcase condensation happens from engine operation - not from just sitting around. The real trick is to ventilate these residual combustion products from the crankcase immediately after shutdown before they all condense. Systems are now starting to be sold which actively do this. A lot of this moisture accumulation problem would go away if aircraft engines had a positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system like car engines now do, but they don't for whatever reason. I suspect part of the reason car engines now last so much longer is due to the PCV system. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 1:39 pm, nrp wrote:
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the breather. Burning hydrocarbons generate CO2 and water. The net dew point of combustion and blowby products is about 180 degF. The water will condense in cooler sections of the crankcase. It is this water that causes most corrosion - especially after combining with nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides which make acid. Crankcase condensation happens from engine operation - not from just sitting around. The real trick is to ventilate these residual combustion products from the crankcase immediately after shutdown before they all condense. Systems are now starting to be sold which actively do this. A lot of this moisture accumulation problem would go away if aircraft engines had a positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system like car engines now do, but they don't for whatever reason. I suspect part of the reason car engines now last so much longer is due to the PCV system. Part of the problem is the water mixed with the oil; it's reluctant to evaporate when it's like that. Running the engine long enough to give it time to boil out is the best thing, and a PCV system would surely help. Proof of water as a combustion byproduct can be noted in colder climates. If the breather tube is not drilled with a relief hole partway up from its exit, it's liable to freeze up in cold weather as the moisture that's constantly leaving the tube freezes at the exit and plugs it. Then the pressure builds in the case and blows the front seal out, scaring the daylights out of the pilot as oil covers the windscreen. Some operators insulate that tube as well to keep the gases hot enough to keep that exit open. When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the breather tube the next morning. That water wasn't sucked into the engine as it cooled off. The engine's internal volume might be two or three cubic feet, and if the air in there contracts by even 30%, that little bit isn't going to pull in much moisture. It becomes a bigger problem in wet climates and repeated warming/cooling cycles, as an airplane sits outside for months on end and gets warm in the sun and cools off at night. The same phenomenon puts water in your fuel tanks. Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's probably no more than about 1 cu ft of volume in a typical
crankcase. Even so that will contain on the order of half to one shot glass full of water on shutdown. This will almost entirely condense out as the crankcase is cooled to room temperature. There is a slight amount of in-out-in of surrounding atmospheric humidity with temperature, but the amount of water contained in that air is trivial compared to that generated or left over by the products of combustion. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the breather tube the next morning. I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3 foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips down to cause the puddle. An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely after flight and see if anything accumulates. Good Luck, Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 22, 6:43 am, Mike Spera wrote:
When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the breather tube the next morning. I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3 foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips down to cause the puddle. An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely after flight and see if anything accumulates. Good Luck, Mike That's what I meant. It's not any gases coming out after shutdown; it's the thickened oil, containing water, that hangs in that cold breather tube and drips out slowly overnight in the heated hangar. The water in the emulksion came from combustion blowby. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3 foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips down to cause the puddle. An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely after flight and see if anything accumulates. Good Luck, Mike That's what I meant. It's not any gases coming out after shutdown; it's the thickened oil, containing water, that hangs in that cold breather tube and drips out slowly overnight in the heated hangar. The water in the emulksion came from combustion blowby. Dan Sorry Dan, That thread was so screwed up I could not tell if you were in the "it blows out after shutdown" or the "it sucks in after shutdown" group. I'm not sure the breather tube needs to be in the cold. My Cherokee drips whether it is 0 or 90 outside. Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 2:39*pm, nrp wrote:
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the breather. * It seems to me that the air in the crancase is about 250 deg F typically, since the pistons and such are hotter than the oil. That means the partial pressure inside the crankcase decreases as the engine cools, and the pressure drops, according to the equation Pv=RT. As the pressure drops inside, the air outside has to enter the crankcase to equalize the pressure, correct? With the air temp as much as 200 deg higher inside the engine as outside, that means that a volume of about half the crankcase of outside air ENTERS the crankcase during the pressure equalization process. At least that is the way it seems to me. Bud |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"As the pressure drops inside, the air outside has to enter the
crankcase to equalize the pressure, correct? With the air temp as much as 200 deg higher inside the engine as outside, that means that a volume of about half the crankcase of outside air ENTERS the crankcase during the pressure equalization process. At least that is the way it seems to me." But it isn't air in the crankcase during engine operation. It is a mixture of CO2 and water vapor. Outside air will re-enter only when the water vapor condenses after shutdown. The amount of water vapor in the comparatively cool outside air being drawn in is one or two orders of magnitude less than that in the hot crankcase. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 11:38*pm, nrp wrote:
*"As the pressure drops inside, the air outside has to enter the crankcase to equalize the pressure, correct? With the air temp as much as 200 deg higher inside the engine as outside, that means that a volume of about half the crankcase of outside air ENTERS the crankcase during the pressure equalization process. At least that is the way it seems to me." But it isn't air in the crankcase during engine operation. *It is a mixture of CO2 and water vapor. * Well OK. The gas law of PV=nRT is true for all gases. All of them. The point is that the engine does inhale (for the lack of a better word) a significant volume of air from outside as it cools down. This is a well known process. This air contains moisture. The oxidation process (rusting) of the engine parts is galvanic corrosion and all it needs is a molecular thin layer of moisture on the surface of say the cam lobe. The total amount of water needed to cause this process is miniscule. What prevents it from rusting your engine parts is the layer of oil on them. Regular running of the engine replenishes this layer of oil. This is what is important. Outside air will re-enter only when the water vapor condenses after shutdown. The air enters as the pressure drops when the GAS inside the crankcase cools. Condensation has nothing to do with it. If there were no moisture in the gas contained in the crankcase at all, none, at shutdown, the engine would still injest much more than enough moisture than necessary to cause problems as it cools down. Condensation is only only something else that happens along with the heat loss. The amount of water vapor in the comparatively cool outside air being drawn in is one or two orders of magnitude less than that in the hot crankcase. The point is that you can fly all you want and remove all the water from the oil that exists. You will still get plenty of moisture inside the engine as it sits idle just from the outside air it injests as it cools. Even barometric pressure changes as the weather passes by is enough to cause engine corrosion. Many pilots seem to believe that blow-by in the engine is a normal operating condition. My experience( and opinion) and that of many other race engine mechanics that I have talked to, is that once combustion gases begin to leak past the rings, the end of that engine is imminent and soon. Very soon. Blowby totally destroys the lubrication of the piston in the area of the blowby, and it shouldn't take a rocket scientist to know what that means. regards, Bud |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 22, 6:15 pm, wrote:
Many pilots seem to believe that blow-by in the engine is a normal operating condition. My experience( and opinion) and that of many other race engine mechanics that I have talked to, is that once combustion gases begin to leak past the rings, the end of that engine is imminent and soon. Very soon. Blowby totally destroys the lubrication of the piston in the area of the blowby, and it shouldn't take a rocket scientist to know what that means. regards, Bud My experience is as an aircraft mechanic. Part of the inspection process is the differential compression test on each cylinder, when it's hot after shutdown. All cylinders leak a small amount past the rings, and when the engine cools the leakage is considerably worse. All rings have ring gaps, and unless you have stacked rings (two rings in the same groove) you cannot stop the leakage. Aircraft engines do not have stacked rings. The fact that a frozen-shut breather will cause the front seal to blow out is enough evidence that rings leak. The volume of the crankcase, as noted earlier, is very small. The amount of water in a cubic foot of air, even if it's saturated, is miniscule compared to that which gets past the rings curing combustion, unless the aircraft is parked for a long time and the heating/cooling cycles of day/night pump air in and out repeatedly for a long time. Water, even a small amount, mixes with oil and in the presence of metal, which acts as a catalyst, breaks the oil down and creates acids. The thin film of oil on the parts is the first contributor to this process and is not much protection at all. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences between automotive & airplane engines | Chris Wells | Home Built | 105 | February 18th 06 11:00 PM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
LOM engines | buckey | Home Built | 14 | October 30th 03 05:22 PM |
automotive parts on airplane engines | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 15 | September 28th 03 02:55 AM |
Barnyard--- Auto engines | Jerry Springer | Home Built | 10 | August 8th 03 06:38 PM |