A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 21st 07, 11:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines

On Dec 21, 1:39 pm, nrp wrote:
Air doesn't come into the crankcase via the breather - rather
combustion products that leak past the rings vent out thru the
breather. Burning hydrocarbons generate CO2 and water. The net dew
point of combustion and blowby products is about 180 degF. The water
will condense in cooler sections of the crankcase. It is this water
that causes most corrosion - especially after combining with nitrogen
oxides and sulfur oxides which make acid.

Crankcase condensation happens from engine operation - not from just
sitting around. The real trick is to ventilate these residual
combustion products from the crankcase immediately after shutdown
before they all condense. Systems are now starting to be sold which
actively do this.

A lot of this moisture accumulation problem would go away if aircraft
engines had a positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system like car
engines now do, but they don't for whatever reason. I suspect part of
the reason car engines now last so much longer is due to the PCV
system.


Part of the problem is the water mixed with the oil; it's
reluctant to evaporate when it's like that. Running the engine long
enough to give it time to boil out is the best thing, and a PCV system
would surely help.
Proof of water as a combustion byproduct can be noted in
colder climates. If the breather tube is not drilled with a relief
hole partway up from its exit, it's liable to freeze up in cold
weather as the moisture that's constantly leaving the tube freezes at
the exit and plugs it. Then the pressure builds in the case and blows
the front seal out, scaring the daylights out of the pilot as oil
covers the windscreen. Some operators insulate that tube as well to
keep the gases hot enough to keep that exit open.
When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold
weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the
breather tube the next morning. That water wasn't sucked into the
engine as it cooled off. The engine's internal volume might be two or
three cubic feet, and if the air in there contracts by even 30%, that
little bit isn't going to pull in much moisture. It becomes a bigger
problem in wet climates and repeated warming/cooling cycles, as an
airplane sits outside for months on end and gets warm in the sun and
cools off at night. The same phenomenon puts water in your fuel tanks.

Dan
  #2  
Old December 21st 07, 11:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
nrp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 128
Default Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines

There's probably no more than about 1 cu ft of volume in a typical
crankcase. Even so that will contain on the order of half to one shot
glass full of water on shutdown. This will almost entirely condense
out as the crankcase is cooled to room temperature.

There is a slight amount of in-out-in of surrounding atmospheric
humidity with temperature, but the amount of water contained in that
air is trivial compared to that generated or left over by the products
of combustion.
  #3  
Old December 22nd 07, 01:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Mike Spera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 220
Default Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines


When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold
weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the
breather tube the next morning.



I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather
outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3
foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the
crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube
walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips
down to cause the puddle.

An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely
after flight and see if anything accumulates.

Good Luck,
Mike
  #4  
Old December 22nd 07, 08:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines

On Dec 22, 6:43 am, Mike Spera wrote:
When we bring the airplanes in after operating in cold
weather, oil and water emulsion will be found on the floor under the
breather tube the next morning.


I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather
outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3
foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the
crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube
walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips
down to cause the puddle.

An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely
after flight and see if anything accumulates.

Good Luck,
Mike


That's what I meant. It's not any gases coming out after
shutdown; it's the thickened oil, containing water, that hangs in that
cold breather tube and drips out slowly overnight in the heated
hangar. The water in the emulksion came from combustion blowby.

Dan
  #5  
Old December 23rd 07, 12:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Mike Spera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 220
Default Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines



I suspect that the puddles have more to do with the fact that breather
outlets tend to be on the top of the engine and are connected to a 3
foot tube running straight down than any gasses purging out of the
crankcase at shutdown (or what the temperature was outside). The tube
walls are coated with a water/oil mix from flight and slowly this drips
down to cause the puddle.

An interesting test would be to remove the breather tubes completely
after flight and see if anything accumulates.

Good Luck,
Mike



That's what I meant. It's not any gases coming out after
shutdown; it's the thickened oil, containing water, that hangs in that
cold breather tube and drips out slowly overnight in the heated
hangar. The water in the emulksion came from combustion blowby.

Dan


Sorry Dan, That thread was so screwed up I could not tell if you were in
the "it blows out after shutdown" or the "it sucks in after shutdown"
group. I'm not sure the breather tube needs to be in the cold. My
Cherokee drips whether it is 0 or 90 outside.
Mike
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differences between automotive & airplane engines Chris Wells Home Built 105 February 18th 06 11:00 PM
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch Paul Home Built 0 October 18th 04 10:14 PM
LOM engines buckey Home Built 14 October 30th 03 05:22 PM
automotive parts on airplane engines Wallace Berry Home Built 15 September 28th 03 02:55 AM
Barnyard--- Auto engines Jerry Springer Home Built 10 August 8th 03 06:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.