![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Changing tasks in the air is a very good tool and should continue to
be used. In the many contests that I have flown, we have always had a few task changes and it has always worked to make a better and safer contest. There is no sense in sending the whole fleet into an area of dead air or where sotrms are developing. To try to anticiapte this before launch is just impossible. Charlie Spratt is a master at understanding the conditions and changing the task when required. With todays GPS and logger systems, it is far easier than the old days of photos. When a task change occurs, just go out a little way and find some empty space to reset the task in your computer. It doesn't take that long anyway. I would much rather fly a task in better conditions than being forced to fly into storms and landing out. There lies much more danger. ASW27 BV |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA competition rules re team flying? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 5 | October 5th 07 11:35 PM |
US Contest Rules Proposed Changes for 2006 | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 18 | January 12th 06 04:30 PM |
Proposed 2005 Rules On SRA Site | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 79 | January 27th 05 06:51 PM |
Competition rules summary? | Ted Wagner | Soaring | 2 | January 21st 04 08:25 PM |
New SRA Site - New 2003 Rules Minutes and 2004 Rules Summary | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 03:38 AM |