Awesome moonscape

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
BradGuth wrote
innews:155f6ddf-880d-4ddf-8a4b-f2ed6d43a2f2
@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.c
om:

On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:ecc7fd61-c790-40ce-8969-12f569eb3a92

@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c om:

On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:0472d2d4-c32c-4335-bf9b-





s.c om:

Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo
boat? (drugs?)

Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't
need them. Not one little bit.

Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak
moments were not the least bit bluish?

BB King wasn't available?

Bertie

No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks
exactly like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for
the extent of what Hitler accomplished.

My Mindset?

Wasnb't aware that I had one.

Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.

Bertie

Can't outline a Usenet shadow.

But you said I had a mindset.

Bertie

There are good and bad mindsets. The likes of a Zionist puppeteered
Hitler and that of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) are each
examples of the Borg like bad kind of mindset.



MMm, I see.
We need good strong leaders. Where' Lorne Green when you need him?


How about your MI5/CIA--MIB shadow mindset sharing as to why our
NASA/ Apollo moon wasn't ever the least bit dark and blue.



You're claimign tht the astronauts were beaten?

BradGuth wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
:

Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that physically
dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered Kodak moments?


I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more satisfying.
However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg tempera sort of feel I
do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.


Bertie

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Dec 24, 11:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
BradGuth wrote
innews:78439acf-424b-46e1-967f-

om:



On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:c5d29baf-06cf-43b9-a03d-
legroup
s.c om:

Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously
can't seem to type out that name of that other physics, science
and banking smart religion that was supposedly tight with
Hitler.

Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.

You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?

Bertie

Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share
of honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out
(it's sometimes called remorse).

Are you sure that's what it's called?

Bertie

Yes, I'm dead certain it's called remorse, of which you folks clearly
haven't any such stinking remorse about much of anything.


Well, I do wish I hadn't eaten that extra desert. That counts, right?


Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'

So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does he
say he does and secretly doesn't?


Bertie

On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Dec 24, 11:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:78439acf-424b-46e1-967f-

om:

On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:c5d29baf-06cf-43b9-a03d-





s.c om:

Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously
can't seem to type out that name of that other physics, science
and banking smart religion that was supposedly tight with
Hitler.

Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.

You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?

Bertie

Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share
of honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out
(it's sometimes called remorse).

Are you sure that's what it's called?

Bertie

Yes, I'm dead certain it's called remorse, of which you folks clearly
haven't any such stinking remorse about much of anything.

Well, I do wish I hadn't eaten that extra desert. That counts, right?



Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'

So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does he
say he does and secretly doesn't?

A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind of
god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster that
always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often as they
like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated way within
Usenet.

Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact very
same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping Zionist or
devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those Mormon pretend
Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to embrace the notions of
ETs and of whatever their intelligent design might have had to do with
the unusually complex forms of life as we know it.

Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of their
own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars unless
snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return. Which group
do you fit into?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
:

Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that physically
dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered Kodak moments?

I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more satisfying.
However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg tempera sort of feel I
do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.

Bertie

In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of your
empty head has gotten your undivided attention. Figures, doesn't it.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 25, 3:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:155f6ddf-880d-4ddf-8a4b-f2ed6d43a2f2

@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.c



om:

On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:ecc7fd61-c790-40ce-8969-12f569eb3a92

@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c om:

On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:0472d2d4-c32c-4335-bf9b-



s.c om:

Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo
boat? (drugs?)

Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't
need them. Not one little bit.

Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak
moments were not the least bit bluish?

BB King wasn't available?

Bertie

No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks
exactly like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for
the extent of what Hitler accomplished.

My Mindset?

Wasnb't aware that I had one.

Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.

Bertie

Can't outline a Usenet shadow.

But you said I had a mindset.

Bertie

There are good and bad mindsets. The likes of a Zionist puppeteered
Hitler and that of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) are each
examples of the Borg like bad kind of mindset.

MMm, I see.
We need good strong leaders. Where' Lorne Green when you need him?


How about your MI5/CIA--MIB shadow mindset sharing as to why our
NASA/ Apollo moon wasn't ever the least bit dark and blue.

You're claimign tht the astronauts were beaten?

Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.

Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
belt?

- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote


Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'

So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does
he say he does and secretly doesn't?

A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind of
god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster that
always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often as they
like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated way within
Usenet.

Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact very
same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping Zionist or
devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those Mormon pretend
Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to embrace the notions of
ETs and of whatever their intelligent design might have had to do with
the unusually complex forms of life as we know it.

Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of their
own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars unless
snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return. Which group
do you fit into?


Dunno, I thought you had alreadty decided and were goingto save me the
trouble of deciding for myself.


Bertie

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
:

Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that
physically dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered
Kodak moments?

I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg
tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.

Bertie

In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of your
empty head has gotten your undivided attention.

The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.

Bertie

BradGuth wrote in
:




Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.

Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
belt?


You bet I would.


Bertie

On Dec 25, 5:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.

Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
belt?

You bet I would.

Bertie

And that's either because you had yourself an actual fly-by-rocket
lander (though of undocumented prototype R&D) as of 4 decades ago and
oddly not doable as of today, and/or is this naked moon walkabout
possible because of your superior rad-hard DNA?

Remember that you folks can't even tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon
wasn't the least bit physically dark or much less looking blue, not to
mention your not knowing of where or how the hell Venus was hiding.

- Brad Guth