![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques schrieb:
When someone asks what causes a spin, ... the correct answer is that stall and yaw rate must be present to produce a spin .... If you then ask a student to explain the aerodynamics in play as a spin develops, it's THEN you want the auto rotational aerodynamics. Different approach. You, as a military pilot (as I think to have understood), believe in the behavioristic approach. Me, as a scientist (and amateur pilot) follow the cognitive approach. Your approach yields pilots who exactly know what to do in this or that situation, but probably without really understanding the deeper reasons. My approach tries to understand the underlying physics and to deduct the needed pilot action from there. Not nessecairy for a pilot, but it's my style, I think it's interesting and it's the prerequisite if you want to go on your own feet beyond the tought stuff. Now if only that fog around here would go away so I could go and rent that Cap 10 and do some spins... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know of any autopilot that could be programmed to fly an aerobatic
maneuver based on predicted actions. Yet an autopilot can be designed to observe and respond to the observed dynamic actions of the airplane. "Stefan" wrote in message ... | Dudley Henriques schrieb: | | When someone asks what causes a spin, ... the correct answer is | that stall and yaw rate must be present to produce a spin | ... | If you then ask a student to explain the aerodynamics in play as a spin | develops, it's THEN you want the auto rotational aerodynamics. | | Different approach. You, as a military pilot (as I think to have | understood), believe in the behavioristic approach. Me, as a scientist | (and amateur pilot) follow the cognitive approach. Your approach yields | pilots who exactly know what to do in this or that situation, but | probably without really understanding the deeper reasons. My approach | tries to understand the underlying physics and to deduct the needed | pilot action from there. Not nessecairy for a pilot, but it's my style, | I think it's interesting and it's the prerequisite if you want to go on | your own feet beyond the tought stuff. | | Now if only that fog around here would go away so I could go and rent | that Cap 10 and do some spins... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin schrieb:
I don't know of any autopilot that could be programmed to fly an aerobatic maneuver based on predicted actions. Yet an autopilot can be designed to observe and respond to the observed dynamic actions of the airplane. I don't know of any autopilot that could be programmed to perform rolling circles, either. But where's the relevance? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flight is an art based on a science.
"Stefan" wrote in message ... | Jim Macklin schrieb: | | I don't know of any autopilot that could be programmed to fly an aerobatic | maneuver based on predicted actions. Yet an autopilot can be designed to | observe and respond to the observed dynamic actions of the airplane. | | I don't know of any autopilot that could be programmed to perform | rolling circles, either. But where's the relevance? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Different approach. You, as a military pilot (as I think to have understood), believe in the behavioristic approach. Me, as a scientist (and amateur pilot) follow the cognitive approach. Your approach yields pilots who exactly know what to do in this or that situation, but probably without really understanding the deeper reasons. Well...I could say that your comment above is a deep personal insult (which it is BTW :-) but in this case I will respect the fact that you simply don't know anything at all about me since you have assumed I am a military pilot which as half the world knows couldn't be further from the truth. I am in fact simply a civilian pilot who has flown military airplanes. It's as simple as that really....oh yes...there is one more thing....I've spent about 50 odd years directly involved with the flight training community as both a CFI and an adviser and consultant at levels ranging from primary training to teaching people to fly the highest performance airplanes in the world. If you surmise that the people I have taught to spin airplanes "probably don't understand the deeper reasons" involved that YOU as a scientist can provide, or that the pilots I have trained don't know thoroughly the complete aerodynamics involved with spins, I fear you are in for a deep disappointment :-)) We just present these things when it is correct to present them and not when another explanation is the right explanation :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coordinated turns without rudder, and autopilots | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 188 | June 1st 07 07:09 PM |
Coordinated turns and the little ball | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 51 | October 11th 06 10:17 PM |
Is rudder required for coordinated turns? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 41 | September 24th 06 06:40 PM |
Snap / Flick and spins in flight simulators | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | September 2nd 06 07:10 AM |
Coordinated turning stall and spins | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 20 | November 18th 03 08:46 PM |