![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 29, 1:20 am, " wrote:
Hi everyone: I got my power license two years ago. Shortly after I saw the light and was converted to gliders. I just passed my glider checkride a week ago. Here's my question to you all: to what extent can further training in power flying, in particular the instrument rating, be of use in glider flying? My personal goal is to pursue cross-country soaring. Would an instrument rating broaden my horizons and sharpen my flying, or is it better to conserve time, energy, and resources for gliders. To those of you who have instrument ratings - how has the instrument rating helped with your glider flying? Also, how has power flying helped with your glider flying? -Teresa Teresa, I firmly believe that you SHOULD pursue the instrument rating. I had my PPASEL/Inst/Commercial ASEL/Commercial AMEL/Inst before being lured into soaring. After adding Commercial Glider (winch and aerotow, in the same day), I later added ATP MEL. What's missing? Helichoppers and Airships...but that takes even MORE money. My instrument training helped prepare me for what I feel is the most overlooked aspect of cross country soaring in this thread: PRE-flight planning. Yes, you can get some of this from VFR cross country flight (power). You'll have far more opportunity for X-C (power) with an instrument ticket (especially in WA). One thing I noticed about all my flying (including aerobatics) after taking a focused instrument syllabus: ALL of my flying was more precise. I think my glider flying has become slightly more precise as a result of adding the ATP after having soared for several years. I suspect you will benefit from a similar transference of skills to your soaring. The instrument check ride is probably the hardest one you'll ever take (notice, I've taken SIX of them)...well, maybe the ATP will be a little harder, since it involves much tighter tolerances (+/- 50 ft vs +/-100 feet on altitude, tighter airspeed and heading tolerances). Many will tell you that the ATP is just a glorified instrument checkride -- having them shut down an engine, etc., adds to the fun. Oh, and FWIW, when I was about where you are in my flying career (20- something years ago), I also swore I'd never get an ATP rating, let alone do any work as a commercial pilot. Bottom line: an instrument rating will make you a better PILOT, period. Many will debate how much it will help you specifically with soaring. Perhaps you'll one day use the instrument ticket to get out of Seattle IFR to a VFR day at Ephrata, to really enjoy many different types of flying in the same day. I've done that here in "sunny southern California." To shore up my soaring credentials, I own a 1-26, and I've flown it to 28,300 feet MSL, with a gain of over 21,000 feet -- and I've flown diamond goal (300k Out & Return) in it. So I've got silver, gold and two of the three diamonds in a 1-26 -- and yes, I'm hoping to add a 500k diamond distance flight when time, skill and soaring conditions permit. I also own a 1948 Globe GC-1B Swift (power, retractable, taildragger), and I sometimes use that to GET TO the soaring...sometimes starting IFR. Some are probably referring to me as the perfect masochist: six check rides, 1-26 owner/diamond pilot, Swift Taildragger pilot (yeah, I used to tow gliders...and banners, too). I applaud your decision to take the instrument ground school. I implore you to take at least a few hours of IFR FLIGHT training -- see if it's FUN in some way (even if masochistically). It will make you a better pilot. More precise. More confident. More comfortable talking with FSS and ATC. Lastly: don't EVER go IFR in an aircraft unless you and your aircraft (glider OR power) are equipped to do so legally, proficiently and safely. Look at all the power statistics and some of the glider statistics: A VFR pilot/aircraft proceeding into Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) is a sure recipe for disaster. Consider that when one is "sucked into IMC," an Instrument Rated pilot has a _marginally_ better chance of surviving the encounter than a pilot without instrument training. It's still not worth the gamble. Best wishes in ALL your flying endeavors, and a happy new year to you, too!!! -Pete #309 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Accelerated Instrument Rating | Peter Bauer | Piloting | 51 | June 17th 04 05:46 PM |
The new Instrument Rating PTS | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | May 27th 04 12:35 AM |
Instrument rating?? | Paul Folbrecht | Piloting | 99 | March 15th 04 07:50 PM |
Who has an instrument rating? | No Such User | Piloting | 20 | March 4th 04 08:06 PM |
Got my Instrument Rating! | Jazzy_Pilot | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 21st 03 02:35 AM |