![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What does your POH say about opening spoilers at high speed? Below
Maneuvering Speed (80 kts, I checked) it shouldn't be a big deal. FWIW, I think you did the right thing in losing speed right now, rather than thinking of the FAA implications. Could the feds ground you from flying your ultralight anyway (probably)? ;-) Forgive me if this strays from the thread a little, but I think it is worth expanding on the relationships between maneuvering speed (Va), spoilers and speeds/loads. Here is my understanding: 1. There is no relationship between Va (maneuvering speed) and spoilers, except that Va is determined with spoilers retracted. Va is based on pitch (elevator inputs). There is a general belief that below Va you can do anything with any flight control, and the glider cannot be damaged. This is may be true in some, perhaps many, situations, but it is not true in any certification sense. [See EASA glider regs CS 22.335] 2. Once spoilers are deployed, the loads for which the glider is certified drop to +3.5 from +5.3 (utility) / +7.0 (aerobatic). [See EASA glider regs CS 22.345] For the reason stated in #2 above, "The Handbook of Glider Aerobatics" (Mallinson and Woollard, 1999, page 30) states "It is nearly always better to slow a glider by 'pulling g' rather than by operating the airbrakes". They are speaking here of aerobatic gliders (rated to 7 g's) during aerobatic maneuvers. There is some difference in the loads/slowing that can be achieved by utility gliders. Also, there are other considerations when using 'g' to slow (symmetric loads, etc.). For the purposes of this discussion, I think I'm safe with the summarization that the choice of spoiler over 'g' should not be automatic in all situations. This is not to say that spoilers may or may not have been an appropriate response in the case being discussed, or many other situations. Rather, I want to dissuade those who might feel that spoilers are an appropriate response in every situation. Certainly deploying spoilers and pulling high g's could be a catastrophic combination. I am certainly open to correction if there is an error in my analysis. Regards, Eric |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More Troubling Planetary News!!! | Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_] | Products | 1 | August 24th 07 07:10 AM |
More Troubling Planetary News | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 3 | January 24th 07 03:40 AM |
More Troubling Planetary News | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 2 | November 20th 06 03:15 AM |
More Troubling Planetary News | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 10 | November 17th 06 02:57 AM |
Erosion of U.S. Industrial Base Is Troubling | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 1 | July 29th 03 06:57 AM |