![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don,
We had the same problem at TSA when DFW decided to expand the Class B airspace to 30 miles. We weren't informed and suddenly it was a "done deal". The first thing we noticed was 737s crossing directly overhead at 3300 agl and 250kt. We tow higher than that for some of our training and on most days we get much higher in lift. We called AOPA and got them involved ASAP. Even though we were late to the party, they were very helpful. Their rep. for our area was a retired ATC management type who was involved with designing the first TCA around DFW, and he was excellent! We had several meetings with DFW TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach Control) and the regional office of the FAA. We brought FAA people as well as controllers to the gliderport to give them a first hand look at the danger. We had a couple of near misses (one extremely close) with corporate traffic and filed reports. I can go into much greater detail but, to make a long story short, we hammered out an agreement where we inform them when we operate and they permanently cut off a substantial portion of the southern boundary of the Class B. In addition, they now route the 737 and corporate traffic far enough to our North that it's not a factor except when that traffic has to deviate for weather. No transponders either because, among other things that you listed, they agreed that several transponders in very close proximity would be counterproductive on their scopes. Based on our experience I would say first and foremost, get AOPA involved. Explain all your hardships with this new Class B configuration and that you weren't properly notified, if that's the case. Let them direct you in what to do. Find two or three people in your club who are knowledgeable in the workings of ATC around CLE. The best would be pilots who started flying in the local area and are now into the corporate or airline side of the business. They'll have a good working knowledge of the local airspace and will probably have some valuable contacts too. Regard all meetings as negotiations for the health and longevity of your club. And remember, as we found out, when it comes to airspace design, ATC doesn't always do things because they really and truly need them. Based on our experience, these are just a few of the things I can advise you of. In the end, it may be a tough sell because of the runway alignment at CLE but, for your club, you have to try. In our experience, when ATC finally saw the potential for problems, we were able to get a deal that's workable for both parties. Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don - please contact Dave Nuss or myself
[ ] [you know - remove the NO...] and we can send you the hearing notice- NPRM - we have been asked to participate, but really need someone impacted to attend. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bravo | Mal[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 15th 07 02:47 AM |
Orlando Class Bravo | Ehvee8or | Piloting | 5 | April 12th 05 11:41 PM |
Lost comm while VFR in Class Bravo | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 10 | April 23rd 04 11:12 PM |
Is type BE35 or Bravo Echo 35? | Peter R. | Piloting | 3 | March 4th 04 05:37 AM |
Aw Shits and Bravo Zulus | Gordon | Naval Aviation | 31 | December 9th 03 10:42 PM |