Cessna's response to negative feedback on Skycatcher being builtin China

"James Sleeman" wrote

Gitmo is a disgrace to the US. To try and justify it by any means is
ludicrous.

So during a war, you advocate returning prisoners of war?

I don't remember that happening during WW II or Vietnam, do you?

If you think that we are not at war, or that they are not enemy soldiers,
then you are ludicrous.
--
Jim in NC

On Jan 6, 2:47*am, "Morgans" wrote:
"James Sleeman" wrote

Gitmo is a disgrace to the US. *To try and justify it by any means is
ludicrous.

So during a war, you advocate returning prisoners of war?


The US Government has consistently proclaimed that these are not
Prisoners of War. If they would do so, it wouldn't be half the
problem it is for the US now, except of course, they wouldn't be able
to torture the prisoners any more.

"James Sleeman" wrote

The US Government has consistently proclaimed that these are not
Prisoners of War.

Right. They are fighting in a war that is being fought by an arm without
the support a government. They are our enemies, all the same, and they
were fighting, thus they are called enemy combatants.

If they would do so, it wouldn't be half the problem it is for the US now,
except of course, they wouldn't be able to torture the prisoners any more.

Not true. Since they are not in an army supported by a country that signed
the Geneva Convention, they have no protection.

The way the cowards continue to blow up our soldiers and civilian support
people with suicide bombs, they deserve no protection, either. The fact
that they are still kept alive is more than they deserve.
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
The way the cowards continue to blow up our soldiers and civilian support
people with suicide bombs, they deserve no protection, either. The fact
that they are still kept alive is more than they deserve.

Conveniently forgetting how many prisoners have been found innocent and
eligible for release but are still being held there, of course...

Morgans schrieb:
"James Sleeman" wrote

The US Government has consistently proclaimed that these are not
Prisoners of War.

Right. They are fighting in a war that is being fought by an arm without
the support a government. They are our enemies, all the same, and they
were fighting, thus they are called enemy combatants.

In which cave have you lived that you have missed all the reports about
innocent people there (and all other disgusting stuff)?

If they would do so, it wouldn't be half the problem it is for the US now,
except of course, they wouldn't be able to torture the prisoners any more.

Not true. Since they are not in an army supported by a country that signed
the Geneva Convention, they have no protection.

come on! don't come with international treaties! not you as an American.
The USA must accept authority of the international court first - then,
only then you *might* have a say.

The way the cowards continue to blow up our soldiers and civilian support

What would you do if some foreign troops (without declaring war or
anything else international recognised) comes to your place and demand
that they have every say and that you are nothing but a ****ing
nonbeliever (and worser things)? Can you seriously come up with some
arguments what YOU would do?

people with suicide bombs, they deserve no protection, either. The fact
that they are still kept alive is more than they deserve.

No wonder they love you so much.

#m

"Martin Hotze" wrote

No wonder they love you so much.

You, with your stand on various things over the years have NO right to
lecture me, on ANYTHING.

RE-plonked.
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
"Martin Hotze" wrote
No wonder they love you so much.

You, with your stand on various things over the years have NO right to
lecture me, on ANYTHING.

RE-plonked.

In other words, you can't answer his arguments.

Morgans schrieb:
"Martin Hotze" wrote
No wonder they love you so much.

You, with your stand on various things over the years have NO right to
lecture me, on ANYTHING.

u-uhh, arguments. *HAHA*

RE-plonked.

*wow* maybe you should go to Iraq and plonk all the people there that
don't love you, too. Else you might bring them to Gitmo, and on the way
make a stopover in Syria for some torture.

ROTFL, #m

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...


*wow* maybe you should go to Iraq and plonk all the people there that
don't love you, too. Else you might bring them to Gitmo, and on the way
make a stopover in Syria for some torture.


You're getting Bush's wars confused. The "guests" in Spa Gitmo are from
Afghanistan for the most part, I understand some are Arabs. The
waterboarding team from Iraq are being hosted at Abu Greab where sports like
naked piling, box standing, corpse posing and poo painting were being
developed by Lynndie England without the knowledge of her boss Sgt Schultz.

"Martin Hotze" wrote

In which cave have you lived that you have missed all the reports about
innocent people there (and all other disgusting stuff)?

Jails are alwayas full of innocent people. What rock did you just crawl out
from under?


What would you do if some foreign troops (without declaring war or
anything else international recognised) comes to your place and demand
that they have every say and that you are nothing but a ****ing
nonbeliever (and worser things)? Can you seriously come up with some
arguments what YOU would do?
Most of the people in Iraq want us there. Have you not been following the
news of towns turning against the insurgents? Yep, sounds like they really
hate us.

It is not too much of a stretch to say that a majority of the insurgents are
from other countries than Iraq.
Have you missed that, too?

If you believe all that you read from the liberal press, you need to open
your ears to the other news. You know, all the good stuff that happens,
that does not make the mainstream news.

You don't need to reply. I won't be reading your vile.
--
Jim in NC