Cessna's response to negative feedback on Skycatcher being builtin China

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Gig601XLBuilder,

How else do you expect us to deal with non-uniformed combatants in a
combat zone?


That's not what is done at Gitmo. Come on now, nobody can follow the
news and be that naive.


That is exactly who is at Gitmo. Unless you are one of those nit-wits
that think they are sending people there after grabbing people off the
streets for holding up and anti-Bush poster.

Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Gig601XLBuilder,

How else do you expect us to deal with non-uniformed combatants in a
combat zone?


That's not what is done at Gitmo. Come on now, nobody can follow the
news and be that naive.


That is exactly who is at Gitmo. Unless you are one of those nit-wits
that think they are sending people there after grabbing people off the
streets for holding up and anti-Bush poster.

Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that more
than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be released.
But still held onto them.

Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that more
than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be released.
But still held onto them.

Cite?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that
more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be
released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds of
effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years
for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly
difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared
but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April
29, 2007.)

and in those same articles it mentions that some of the prisoners don't want
to go back to their country of origin due to fear for their lives and some
of the countries don't want them back either. but I guess that does not fit
with your argument so you ignore those facts.
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that more
than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be released.
But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds of
effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years
for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly
difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared
but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April
29, 2007.)

news.verizon.net wrote:
and in those same articles it mentions that some of the prisoners don't
want to go back to their country of origin due to fear for their lives
and some of the countries don't want them back either. but I guess that
does not fit with your argument so you ignore those facts.

The argument, since you clearly have the attention span of a gnat with
ADD, is over the claim that every single person imprisoned at Guantanamo
is a terrorist or guilty of some sort of violent action against the U.S.
Those articles clearly refute that, as do the actions of the Pentagon in
offering them release whether or not they have some place to go. Several
years late, mind you...

By the way, are you now taking up the cause of China in calling the 22
Uighur secessionists terrorists?

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
news.verizon.net wrote:
and in those same articles it mentions that some of the prisoners don't
want to go back to their country of origin due to fear for their lives
and some of the countries don't want them back either. but I guess that
does not fit with your argument so you ignore those facts.

The argument, since you clearly have the attention span of a gnat with
ADD, is over the claim that every single person imprisoned at Guantanamo
is a terrorist or guilty of some sort of violent action against the U.S.
Those articles clearly refute that, as do the actions of the Pentagon in
offering them release whether or not they have some place to go. Several
years late, mind you...

You better check your own attention span since you're conflating "cleared
for release" with the circumstances of theri capture.

In case you haven't heard, several sent back from Gitmo have been captured
again or killed in attacks against us.


By the way, are you now taking up the cause of China in calling the 22
Uighur secessionists terrorists?

Head out of ass, please.

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years
for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly
difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared
but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April
29, 2007.)

Oh, source is the Washington Post.

THERE is a bastion of honestly.
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years
for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly
difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared
but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April
29, 2007.)

Oh, source is the Washington Post.

THERE is a bastion of honestly.

I knew that was going to come. No, the source is ultimately the Defense
Department.

Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that more
than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be released.
But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds of
effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years
for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly
difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared
but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April
29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows that the
Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at Gitmo.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"