Cessna's response to negative feedback on Skycatcher being builtin China

Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that more
than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be released.
But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds of
effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years
for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly
difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared
but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April
29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows that the
Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at Gitmo.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:M6Dgj.26101$Ux2.19647@attbi_s22:

Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that
more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be
released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds
of effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months
or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it
increasingly difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82
Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock,
Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows
that the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at
Gitmo.

Why, you gonna offer them a few rooms at your flea pit?

Bertie

Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that
more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be
released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds
of effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months
or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it
increasingly difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82
Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock,
Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows that
the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at Gitmo.

RTFA. While I realize you don't believe anything that didn't come
straight from the asses of Faux News, I'm not going to do your research
for you.

Rich Ahrens wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that
more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be
released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds
of effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months
or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it
increasingly difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82
Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock,
Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows
that the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at Gitmo.

RTFA. While I realize you don't believe anything that didn't come
straight from the asses of Faux News, I'm not going to do your research
for you.

There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the pentagon
to do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then you'd really bitch.

Gig601XLBuilder wrote in
:

Rich Ahrens wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged
that more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and
should be released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five
seconds of effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait
months or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are
finding it increasingly difficult to line up places to send
them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo,
by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows
that the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at
Gitmo.

RTFA. While I realize you don't believe anything that didn't come
straight from the asses of Faux News, I'm not going to do your
research for you.

There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the
pentagon to do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then you'd
really bitch.


As should anyone this side of attila the hun.



Bertie

"Gig601XLBuilder" wrote in message
...
Rich Ahrens wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that
more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should be
released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds of
effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or
years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it
increasingly difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source: 82
Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock,
Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows that
the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at Gitmo.

RTFA. While I realize you don't believe anything that didn't come
straight from the asses of Faux News, I'm not going to do your research
for you.

There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the pentagon to
do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then you'd really bitch.

That's his only output.

"Matt W. Barrow" wrote in
:


"Gig601XLBuilder" wrote in message
...
Rich Ahrens wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged
that more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and
should be released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five
seconds of effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have
to wait months or years for their freedom because U.S. officials
are finding it increasingly difficult to line up places to send
them..." (Source: 82 Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo,
by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows
that the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at
Gitmo.

RTFA. While I realize you don't believe anything that didn't come
straight from the asses of Faux News, I'm not going to do your
research for you.

There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the
pentagon to do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then
you'd really bitch.

That's his only output.

I was thnking somethng else, actually.


Bertie

Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
Rich Ahrens wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote:
Once again ignoring the fact the Pentagon itself acknowledged that
more than 20 percent of them were innocent of charges and should
be released. But still held onto them.

Cite?

You can find articles from last spring (as I said) with five seconds
of effort on Google. Wikipedia quotes one:

"More than a fifth of the approximately 385 prisoners at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, have been cleared for release but may have to wait months
or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it
increasingly difficult to line up places to send them..." (Source:
82 Inmates Cleared but Still Held at Guantanamo, by Craig Whitlock,
Washington Post, April 29, 2007.)

That's a nice Washington Post cite, but I asked for one that shows
that the Pentagon has admitted that it's holding innocent men at Gitmo.

RTFA. While I realize you don't believe anything that didn't come
straight from the asses of Faux News, I'm not going to do your
research for you.

There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the pentagon
to do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then you'd really bitch.

Accept them as refugees and defuse the anger. Of course, that would
effectively admit to having made a mistake in the first place, something
this administration is genetically incapable of.

Rich Ahrens wrote:


There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the
pentagon to do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then you'd
really bitch.

Accept them as refugees and defuse the anger. Of course, that would
effectively admit to having made a mistake in the first place, something
this administration is genetically incapable of.

I read this three times with the hope of finding the sarcasm tag.

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Rich Ahrens wrote:


There's no country that will take them. What do you expect the
pentagon to do. Dump them in the Atlantic. If they did that then
you'd really bitch.

Accept them as refugees and defuse the anger. Of course, that would
effectively admit to having made a mistake in the first place,
something this administration is genetically incapable of.

I read this three times with the hope of finding the sarcasm tag.

It's beyond you, of course.