"socialist" when describing Hillary Clinton

"dVaridel" wrote in
u:

"John Mazor" wrote
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote
Because it's implicit in the scientific method that nothing is 100%
certain,
Somethign that has been explained to you over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over

And still you won't get it.

Now that's a sig worth considering.

...... But but (tm) ...... it's more than 4 lines and there was no
"-----" thingy.




You shoulda seen my old sig. It was several hundred lines.


Bertie

On Jan 8, 8:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"dVaridel" wrote .au:



"John Mazor" wrote
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote
Because it's implicit in the scientific method that nothing is 100%
certain,
Somethign that has been explained to you over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over

And still you won't get it.

Now that's a sig worth considering.

...... But but (tm) ...... it's more than 4 lines and there was no
"-----" thingy.

You shoulda seen my old sig. It was several hundred lines.

Bertie

Shoot you should see some of the WTC conspiracy whack-jobs; one line
body text and 1232.2321 sig lines.

Nutjobs, all of them.

My wife gets into the creationism thing sometimes as well and my reply
has always been that anyone trying to limit the Almighty to 6000 years
vs billions is borderline heretical and fails to grasp the meaning of
'omnipotent', etc, i.e., are they denying the very "all" part of
Almighty? See also alpha and omega.

We are nothing more than the outcome of a sheaf of mathematical
principles set in motion by the Big Bang (now the truly interesting
question is initiated that event).

wrote in
:

On Jan 8, 8:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"dVaridel" wrote
.au:



"John Mazor" wrote
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote
Because it's implicit in the scientific method that nothing is
100% certain,
Somethign that has been explained to you over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over over and over and over and over and over and
over over and over and over and over and over and over over and
over and over and over and over and over over and over and over
and over and over and over over and over and over and over and
over and over over and over and over and over and over and over
over and over and over and over and over and over over and over
and over and over and over and over over and over and over and
over and over and over over and over and over and over and over
and over over and over and over and over and over and over over
and over and over and over and over and over over and over and
over and over and over and over over and over and over and over
and over and over

And still you won't get it.

Now that's a sig worth considering.

...... But but (tm) ...... it's more than 4 lines and there was no
"-----" thingy.

You shoulda seen my old sig. It was several hundred lines.

Bertie

Shoot you should see some of the WTC conspiracy whack-jobs; one line
body text and 1232.2321 sig lines.

Oh believe me I've seen them. They give me a major headache.

Nutjobs, all of them.

Oh yeah.


My wife gets into the creationism thing sometimes as well and my reply
has always been that anyone trying to limit the Almighty to 6000 years
vs billions is borderline heretical and fails to grasp the meaning of
'omnipotent', etc, i.e., are they denying the very "all" part of
Almighty? See also alpha and omega.

We are nothing more than the outcome of a sheaf of mathematical
principles set in motion by the Big Bang (now the truly interesting
question is initiated that event).


Well, don't know what we are but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.

Bertie

Bertie,

but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.


Actually, no, I don't think so. Too much harm has been done by those
who do. The track record is way down in the negatives on terms of
benefits for society.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert wrote in
:

Bertie,

but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.


Actually, no, I don't think so. Too much harm has been done by those
who do. The track record is way down in the negatives on terms of
benefits for society.


Well, you try taking it off of them.


Bertie

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bertie,

but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.


Actually, no, I don't think so. Too much harm has been done by those
who do. The track record is way down in the negatives on terms of
benefits for society.


And atheists have been all sweetness and light. How many people did
Stalin have killed?

Don't blame on God or even the belief in God what can easily be
explained by the nature of man.

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bertie,

but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.


Actually, no, I don't think so. Too much harm has been done by those
who do. The track record is way down in the negatives on terms of
benefits for society.


And atheists have been all sweetness and light.

Shucks no - sometimes we go for a Guiness.

How many people did Stalin have killed?

Was somebody counting? Besides, did he have them killed because of their
religous beliefs or because they were a threat to his power?

Don't blame on God or even the belief in God what can easily be
explained by the nature of man.

Well that begs the question whether the Bible is a work of God or a work of
men.

Since evolution vs creation was brought up somewhere up-thread, do you
think the Tennessee Butler Act and the subsequent verdict of the 1925
"Scopes Trial" served justice or not?

Jim Logajan wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bertie,

but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.


Actually, no, I don't think so. Too much harm has been done by those
who do. The track record is way down in the negatives on terms of
benefits for society.


And atheists have been all sweetness and light.

Shucks no - sometimes we go for a Guiness.

How many people did Stalin have killed?

Was somebody counting? Besides, did he have them killed because of
their religous beliefs or because they were a threat to his power?

Don't blame on God or even the belief in God what can easily be
explained by the nature of man.

Well that begs the question whether the Bible is a work of God or a
work of men.

Since evolution vs creation was brought up somewhere up-thread, do you
think the Tennessee Butler Act and the subsequent verdict of the 1925
"Scopes Trial" served justice or not?


Good grief, i'm redundant.

Bertie

Jim Logajan wrote:

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bertie,

but anyone who believes the set of
fairytales known as the bible is welcome to it.


Actually, no, I don't think so.

Ahh, your religion is restricting what others can do. Nice.

Too much harm has been done by those
who do. The track record is way down in the negatives on terms of
benefits for society.

What is your objective score for all of the postives in addition to the
negatives, Tom?



And atheists have been all sweetness and light.

Shucks no - sometimes we go for a Guiness.

How many people did Stalin have killed?

Was somebody counting? Besides, did he have them killed because of their
religous beliefs or because they were a threat to his power?

Oh my Jim, recent history is so easily forgotten or ignored by some. Here is a
little refresher on Joe Stalin:
Approximately 20 million people were killed by Stalin's reegime, including up
to 14.5 million starved to death for political reasons. At least 1 million were
executed for political "offences." At least 9.5 million more deported, exiled
or imprisoned in work camps, with many of the estimated five million sent to
the 'Gulag Archipelago' never returning alive. Other estimates place the number
of deported at 28 million, including 18 million sent to the 'Gulag'.

What a gentleman, thank goodness he was athiest. Imagine how many people he
could have killed (and so much worse!!) had he found a religion? Nice
diversion attempt with the motives for his unthinkable horror, but the
discussion was about making the bible unwelcome, perhaps with the threat of
law, because of all the "negatives." But instead proved the point you appear to
be against. Stopping religion doesn't stop bad people. In fact, attempting to
stop religion would put you in fundamental agreement with Matthew Murray, who
in December 2007 started shooting in a Denver church, slaughtering people in
the name of athiesm because he proclaimed to hate
religion.
tinyurl.com/282qtx




Don't blame on God or even the belief in God what can easily be
explained by the nature of man.

Well that begs the question whether the Bible is a work of God or a work of
men.

"Begs the question??" How so?

Gig,

How many people did
Stalin have killed?


"In The Name Of Atheism"? None. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

But, nice try. Heard it before, though.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)