![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes: I want you to do an easy experiment that will show you the problem with a non gravity feed system that uses a "both" position. Take a glass of water and two drinking straws. Put one of the straws in the water and hold the other out side of the glass. Now put both straws in your mouth and suck. Unless you are doing something to block the straw that isn't in the water you will find it very hard to get a drink. The same thing happens with a non gravity feed fuel system in the "both" mode. Add a fuel pump. Where would you place the fuel pump to deal with the problem? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
Where would you place the fuel pump to deal with the problem? That would depend on the aircraft. I don't know where it is placed in a Bonanza. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: You can run one tank dry in a Bonanza and have the other at 35 gallons and only need 1/4 twist of the aileron trim to keep things balanced. 1/4 twist = 1/4 rotation of the knob (90 degrees of rotation)? If that's true, then I suppose the weight of the pilot must be far less significant in comparison. I doubt there is a Bonanza flying with a "Both" selection. I've seen pictures of selectors with a "both" position, although apparently they don't come that way from the factory. Odd that such a position isn't standard. Dreamfleet puts such a selector in its Bonanza (one of the very few departures from reality) because MSFS supposedly exaggerates fuel imbalances. I always leave it in that position. They don't do it because they don't build airplanes for idiots. Like you , for instance. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: I've seen pictures of selectors with a "both" position, although apparently they don't come that way from the factory. Odd that such a position isn't standard. It's odd to non-pilots. Even pilots who fly planes with a "Both" position understand why some planes don't have one. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
: On Jan 15, 9:20 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: I never burn fuel from a single side at a time, so I cannot comment on that. Both the Bonanza and the Baron let you draw fuel from both tanks, and that's how I leave it set. If you are heavy and alone in the plane, it has a distinct tendency to bank towards the heavy side. The Bonanza does this, anyway, so it's harder to notice, but the Baron will do it, only not as obviously. When I first started flying these aircraft I noticed odd banking tendencies and it took a while for it to dawn on me that the aircraft was simply loaded unevenly. You can run one tank dry in a Bonanza and have the other at 35 gallons and only need 1/4 twist of the aileron trim to keep things balanced. I haven't tried draining one side tank and tip tank, though, but that's not the recommended procedure IAW the STC, so I won't be trying it. I doubt there is a Bonanza flying with a "Both" selection. Bad idea in a low wing airplane. It's going to favor one tank until it's dry and then your engine will quit with one tank nearly full! Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You can run one tank dry in a Bonanza and have the other at 35 gallons and only need 1/4 twist of the aileron trim to keep things balanced. I haven't tried draining one side tank and tip tank, though, but that's not the recommended procedure IAW the STC, so I won't be trying it. Bad idea in a low wing airplane. It's going to favor one tank until it's dry and then your engine will quit with one tank nearly full! Bertie You're absolutely correct. There's nothing in the POH about it. Any BPPP grads here care to chime in? Dan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 9:20 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
John writes: How much does it pitch to the side if you don't put offsetting weight into the passenger seat and how does it compare to the normal variation caused by fuel burn from a single side at a time? I never burn fuel from a single side at a time, so I cannot comment on that. Both the Bonanza and the Baron let you draw fuel from both tanks, and that's how I leave it set. No, they don't. If you are heavy and alone in the plane, it has a distinct tendency to bank towards the heavy side. The Bonanza does this, anyway, so it's harder to notice, but the Baron will do it, only not as obviously. When I first started flying these aircraft I noticed odd banking tendencies and it took a while for it to dawn on me that the aircraft was simply loaded unevenly. Neither Bonanza (35 or A36) exhibits banking tendency with me solo in the airplane (I weigh 195). How many tons is this pilot? Dan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: No, they don't. Yes, they do, on my sim, See there's your problem. This isn't a group about sims. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
See there's your problem. This isn't a group about sims. That's not my problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
L23 weight and balance | Tony Verhulst | Soaring | 5 | December 31st 05 01:54 AM |
Weight & Balance DVD | jon | Home Built | 0 | October 8th 05 05:39 PM |
Weight and Balance | Dale Larsen | Home Built | 2 | June 23rd 04 05:11 PM |
Weight and Balance | JP | Piloting | 2 | January 13th 04 10:54 AM |
Weight and balance.. | Bart | Rotorcraft | 9 | August 19th 03 02:57 AM |