![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 16, 8:49*am, "Barry" wrote:
and I'd say that seeing some light through the fog doesn't count as "distinctly visible and identifiable". I disagree. When you see the approach lights they are quiet identifiable, even if you cannot see the grass around them. Concerning landing out of an approach like this, I think that most GA pilots, like myself, have very little chance to practice. *We don't have simulators like the airline pilots do, and it's hard in most places to get this type of practice in actual. *The only time I did an actual approach all the way down to minimum (reported viz was 3/8) I found that it was not so easy to transition to landing. *I'm sure that with practice it would become much easier, as you describe, but I don't find the FAA requirement unreasonable.. It doesn't leave much margin for error. Come to Sacramento. You'll get lots of practice in the winter. The transition is not really that hard. From my experience as a CFII the transition to missed is much more difficult for students. Its very common for students to pour on the coals but not pitch up; resulting in racing down the runway but not climbing. In fact, I'd say more than 50% of instrument rated pilots who have lapsed have this issue. Going from visual to instrument is more difficult. Most CFIIs around here require pilots to practice zero/zero take offs by putting the hood on our students before applying power on take off. Its not that we want you to take off in zero vis, its because you could be rolling down the runway and encounter it. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its very common for students to pour on the coals but not pitch up;
resulting in racing down the runway but not climbing. In fact, I'd say more than 50% of instrument rated pilots who have lapsed have this issue. I agree that this is a problem. I attribute it (at least in part) to over-reliance on the airspeed indicator and lack of attention to the attitude indicator, and to the notion that since "power controls altitude," all they have to do to climb is add power. Which, if the plane is trimmed, will eventually be true, but only after a scary few seconds of hanging around at or below DH. Barry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most CFIIs around here
require pilots to practice zero/zero take offs by putting the hood on our students before applying power on take off. Its not that we want you to take off in zero vis, its because you could be rolling down the runway and encounter it. -Robert Question from the uneducated he in this case, do you keep the plane from running off the runway by, well, by what ... the ILS? Is it good enough for that? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 168 | February 5th 08 05:32 PM |
"First Ospreys Land In Iraq; One Arrives After 2 Setbacks" | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 50 | November 30th 07 05:25 AM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
"Airplane Drivers" and "Self Centered Idiots" | Skylune | Piloting | 28 | October 16th 06 05:40 AM |